ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Sustain. Cities

Sec. Social Inclusion in Cities

Volume 7 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/frsc.2025.1468371

This article is part of the Research TopicThe Dynamics of Sustainable, Inclusive and Equitable Human SettlementsView all 9 articles

'No Place Like Home': The Plight of Low-Income Earners in Accessing Housing Subsidies in New Brighton, Gqeberha, South Africa

Provisionally accepted
  • Nelson Mandela University, Port Elizabeth, South Africa

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Assisting the poor through housing subsidies is an international practice, however, in poorer countries, homeownership has been a hurdle. South Africa has been experiencing backlogs in housing emanating from several factors, such as urbanisation and population growth, resulting in millions of people residing in informal settlements and shack backyards. Although the Finance Linked Individual Subsidy Programme (FLISP) is one of the strategies used by the National Department of Human Settlements to assist low-income earners in accessing housing subsidies to curb housing backlogs, positive results are yet to be realised. This study aims to investigate the barriers to accessing housing subsidies for low-income earners residing in New Brighton, Gqerberha, an urban township in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Utilising qualitative data from primary and secondary sources to collect the data, the interpretivism research paradigm was adopted. The secondary data consists of a literature review of relevant academic and policy documents such as journal articles, reports, research documents, and national policy documents. The primary data consists of 10 face-to-face interviews with urban dwellers in informal settlements, and backyard dwellers. To make sense of the data, thematic and content data analysis was used as a process and way to draw valid conclusions from text, words, and concepts. The findings show that low-income earners face multiple and interrelated barriers to accessing housing subsidies, such as a lack of national awareness campaigns or publicity campaigns on FLISP; lack of availability of housing delivery programmes to cater for informal settlements and backyard dwellers; qualifying citizens not opting for housing subsidies and inadequate and irregular incomes. The article concludes by proffering recommendations and implications for policy and practice, such as improving the design, delivery, and monitoring of housing subsidy programmes by the National Department of Human Settlements and other stakeholders to enhance their capacity for the benefit of low-income households and communities.

Keywords: Finance Linked Individual Subsidy Programme, Housing subsidies, Homeownership, informal settlement dwellers, backyarders, Low-income earners, Nelson Mandela Bay Municipality, South Africa

Received: 21 Jul 2024; Accepted: 15 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Mgidlana, Mbanga and Hamunakwadi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Purity Hamunakwadi, Nelson Mandela University, Port Elizabeth, South Africa

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more