The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
METHODS article
Front. Sustain. Cities
Sec. Innovation and Governance
Volume 7 - 2025 |
doi: 10.3389/frsc.2025.1394025
This article is part of the Research Topic Smart and Sustainable Planning for Europe and Beyond View all 6 articles
Stakeholders' feedback integration in spatial planning using Importance-Performance Analysis. The case of the Provincial Strategic Plan of the Autonomous Province of Bolzano-South Tyrol (IT)
Provisionally accepted- 1 Eurac Research, Bolzano, Italy
- 2 Other, Bolzano, Italy
Importance Performance Analysis (IPA) is a research method employed to comprehend and analyze stakeholder feedback on particular issues. A substantial body of research has demonstrated the efficacy of this methodology as a quantitative approach. To date, there has been a paucity of research using IPA as a methodology for integrating stakeholder feedback into the development of strategic spatial plans. The integration of stakeholder feedback is crucial for the development of inclusive, well-informed, and responsive decision-making processes. The objective of this paper is to contribute to the existing body of knowledge on the utilization of the IPA method in the context of spatial planning. This research presented in this paper employs the Provincial Strategic Plan of the Autonomous Province of Bolzano-Bozen as a case study. In particular, the IPA method was employed to analyze the level of importance and performance of the objectives set out in the Provincial Strategic Plan. Importance refers to the importance of the specific objectives for the future development of the area, while performance refers to how well the specific objectives were formulated. The IPA method has been demonstrated to be an effective assessment instrument. The findings demonstrate that the IPA approach enabled the effective gathering of stakeholders' feedback in a systematic manner, identifying pivotal issues and potential shortcomings, and providing policy makers with structured recommendations on how to reformulate strategies and plans.
Keywords: Strategic spatial planning1, sustainable development2, importance performance analysis3, stakeholder consultation4, stakeholder feedback5 Formatted: Highlight Formatted: Highlight Formatted: Highlight Formatted: English (United Kingdom), Highlight Formatted: Highlight Formatted: English (United Kingdom), Highlight Formatted: Highlight Formatted: Highlight Formatted: Highlight Formatted: Highlight
Received: 29 Feb 2024; Accepted: 21 Jan 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Ravazzoli, Maino, Dalla Torre and Labadini. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Elisa Ravazzoli, Eurac Research, Bolzano, Italy
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.