94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
Lucie Adélaïde1*
Sylvia Medina1
Vérène Wagner1Perrine de Crouy-Chanel1
Elsa Real2
Augustin Colette2Florian Couvidat2Bertrand Bessagnet3Maxime Alter4Amélie Durou1Sabine Host5Marion Hulin1
Magali Corso1Mathilde Pascal1- 1Santé Publique France, French Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice, France
- 2Ineris, French National Institute for Industrial Environment and Risks, Parc Technologique ALATA, Verneuil-en-Halatte, France
- 3Citepa, Technical Reference Center for Air Pollution and Climate Change, Paris, France
- 4ATMO Grand Est, Certified Associations of Air Quality Monitoring, Schiltigheim, France
- 5ORS Île-de-France, Regional Health Observatory Île-de-France, Paris, France
A Corrigendum on
Covid-19 Lockdown in Spring 2020 in France Provided Unexpected Opportunity to Assess Health Impacts of Falls in Air Pollution
by Adélaïde, L., Medina, S., Wagner, V., de Crouy-Chanel, P., Real, E., Colette, A., Couvidat, F., Bessagnet, B., Alter, M., Durou, A., Host, S., Hulin, M., Corso, M., and Pascal, M. (2021). Front. Sustain. Cities 3:643821. doi: 10.3389/frsc.2021.643821
In the original article, there was a wording error on the way that the reduction percentages of air pollutant concentrations were expressed. It is not a reduction percentage but a percentage of increase that would have been observed in the absence of lockdown.
A correction has been made to Discussion, “Summary of Findings,” first paragraph:
We replaced the following sentences: “The mean reduction in PM10 concentrations was 8.3%, with values ranging from−1.8 to 39.8% depending on the municipality. For NO2 concentrations, the mean reduction was 29.0%, with values ranging from 3.5 to 187.8% depending on the municipality.” by:
“The daily mean difference between the estimated PM10 level during lockdown and its reference (modeled concentrations without lockdown) was −8.3 μg.m−3. This difference was −2.1 μg.m−3 for NO2.”
In the original article, there was a mistake in Table 2 as published. The four columns entitled “Reduction percentage” were not defined. The corrected Table 2 appears below.
TABLE 2
Table 2. Daily mean differences [min; max] by period, pollutant and area in France from March 16 to June 22, 2020, and from July 1, 2019 to June 30, 2020.
The authors apologize for these errors and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Publisher's Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Keywords: health impact assessment, air pollution, mortality, lockdown, COVID-19, France
Citation: Adélaïde L, Medina S, Wagner V, de Crouy-Chanel P, Real E, Colette A, Couvidat F, Bessagnet B, Alter M, Durou A, Host S, Hulin M, Corso M and Pascal M (2022) Corrigendum: Covid-19 Lockdown in Spring 2020 in France Provided Unexpected Opportunity to Assess Health Impacts of Falls in Air Pollution. Front. Sustain. Cities 4:940436. doi: 10.3389/frsc.2022.940436
Received: 10 May 2022; Accepted: 11 May 2022;
Published: 13 June 2022.
Approved by: Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, Switzerland
Copyright © 2022 Adélaïde, Medina, Wagner, de Crouy-Chanel, Real, Colette, Couvidat, Bessagnet, Alter, Durou, Host, Hulin, Corso and Pascal. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Lucie Adélaïde, bHVjaWUuYWRlbGFpZGVAc2FudGVwdWJsaXF1ZWZyYW5jZS5mcg==