![Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset](https://d2csxpduxe849s.cloudfront.net/media/E32629C6-9347-4F84-81FEAEF7BFA342B3/0B4B1380-42EB-4FD5-9D7E2DBC603E79F8/webimage-C4875379-1478-416F-B03DF68FE3D8DBB5.png)
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
CORRECTION article
Front. Sustain. Cities , 03 November 2022
Sec. Urban Resource Management
Volume 4 - 2022 | https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2022.1057493
This article is a correction to:
Understanding Multiple Dimensions of Perceived Greenspace Accessibility and Their Effect on Subjective Well-Being During a Global Pandemic
A corrigendum on
Understanding multiple dimensions of perceived greenspace accessibility and their effect on subjective well-being during a global pandemic
by Maurer, M., Cook, E. M., Yoon, L., Visnic, O., Orlove, B., Culligan, P. J., and Mailloux, B. J. (2021). Front. Sustain. Cities 3:709997. doi: 10.3389/frsc.2021.709997
In the published article, there was an error. The Methods section incorrectly states the number of interviews analyzed as 74.
A correction has been made to Section 2. Methods, “2.3 Interview,” Paragraph 1. This sentence previously stated:
“The total number of individuals contacted for interviews was 356 and the total number of completed interviews was 74.”
The corrected sentence appears below:
“The total number of individuals contacted for interviews was 356 and the total number of completed interviews was 72.”
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Keywords: subjective well-being, risk perception, COVID-19, greenspace accessibility, urban-rural differences, environmental justice (EJ), public greenspaces, cultural ecosystem services
Citation: Maurer M, Cook EM, Yoon L, Visnic O, Orlove B, Culligan PJ and Mailloux BJ (2022) Corrigendum: Understanding multiple dimensions of perceived greenspace accessibility and their effect on subjective well-being during a global pandemic. Front. Sustain. Cities 4:1057493. doi: 10.3389/frsc.2022.1057493
Received: 29 September 2022; Accepted: 20 October 2022;
Published: 03 November 2022.
Edited and reviewed by: Feni Agostinho, Paulista University, Brazil
Copyright © 2022 Maurer, Cook, Yoon, Visnic, Orlove, Culligan and Mailloux. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Megan Maurer, bWVnbUBpZ24ua3UuZGs=
†These authors share first authorship
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.