ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Sustain.
Sec. Modeling and Optimization for Decision Support
Volume 6 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/frsus.2025.1560119
This article is part of the Research TopicTransdisciplinary Engineering for Sustainability DecisionsView all articles
Transition Engineering co-design sprint: oil company business model
Provisionally accepted
- International Centre for Island Technology, Heriot-Watt University, Orkney, United Kingdom
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
International Oil Companies (IOCs) face competing pressures to reduce production to meet climate targets while delivering expected shareholder value. These competing pressures create a dissonance surrounding the future business strategy of IOCs. The Systems Transition Engineering approach brings experts together to work through an Interdisciplinary Transition Invention, Management and Engineering (InTIME) Design Sprint, to generate novel concepts for business options that relieve competing pressures in complex and unsustainable systems. This article details a case study of an InTIME Design Sprint conducted with oil industry experts involving a series of investigative workshops. The aim of the sprint is to generate foresight for IOC business pivot opportunities that resolve the dissonance surrounding IOC futures in a climate-safe world. A pivot opportunity represents a profitable business strategy within the bounds of what is feasible and socially acceptable. A theoretical oil company was used to test out hypothetical business scenarios throughout the steps of the sprint. The design sprint was successful in moving the oil industry experts beyond the dissonance and facilitating the foresight of viable and climate-safe business pivot opportunities for an IOC. This result represents a breakthrough that was previously considered unthinkable by the sprint participants. This work contributes a novel use case of the InTIME Design Sprint to an upstream energy system and introduces novel applications of tools to navigate cognitive dissonance and complexity within InTIME Design Sprints.
Keywords: International Oil Company (IOC), oil industry transition, Transition engineering, Transdisciplinary Engineering, oil company futures, business models
Received: 13 Jan 2025; Accepted: 14 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Boulton and Krumdieck. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Jack Boulton, International Centre for Island Technology, Heriot-Watt University, Orkney, United Kingdom
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.