![Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset](https://d2csxpduxe849s.cloudfront.net/media/E32629C6-9347-4F84-81FEAEF7BFA342B3/0B4B1380-42EB-4FD5-9D7E2DBC603E79F8/webimage-C4875379-1478-416F-B03DF68FE3D8DBB5.png)
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
REVIEW article
Front. Sustain.
Sec. Circular Economy
Volume 6 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/frsus.2025.1536382
This article is part of the Research Topic Assessing Circular Economy Transitions: Quantitative Approaches and Policy Implications View all 4 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Single-use plastics (SUPs) are synonymous with the biopharmaceuticals sector, facilitating economies of scale, process efficiency, flexibility and sterility assurance, all with a seemingly negligible environmental footprint. Yet, in ever-tightening regulation, mandated by the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and by concern for large-scale industrial impacts, the sustainability of SUP consumption is increasingly being questioned. Whilst the sector contributes to human welfare, its transition risk is unlikely to remain immune to societal pressure for more sustainable production. This paper aims to present a scoping review of the apparent contradiction between sectoral SUP adoption and the increasing importance of circularity. The approach to the review relies on three interwoven strands of evidence: [i] the intersectionality of sustainability policy and regulation with biopharmaceuticals, [ii] single-use technology in biopharmaceuticals and its impacts, and [iii] applications of circular economy principles to single-use technology. It is argued that, whilst life-cycle analysis (LCA) of SUPs in biopharmaceuticals articulates an environmental benefit vis-à-vis conventional technology, high energy intensity and embodied carbon in stainless steel renders the comparison redundant. Moreover, there is a dearth of evidence on circularity, post-use, and on end-of-life considerations. Likewise, there appears to be little sector-wide appetite for the adoption of embryonic solutions for enhancing circularity, such as biodegradables, carbon offsets, reusability, waste-to-energy, and ocean cleanup. Urgent mission-driven research is required on LCA, circular business model feasibility, materials innovation, regulatory frameworks, and sectoral-wide impact. A design-driven inquisition of their interactions, based on industrial symbiosis, could inform potential adoption pathways.
Keywords: biopharmaceuticals, circularity, life-cycle analysis, Single-use plastics, regulation, Sustainable development goals, Symbiosis
Received: 28 Nov 2024; Accepted: 11 Feb 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Goggin, Fleming, MacMahon and Owende. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Malcolm Goggin, TU Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
Adrienne Fleming, TU Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
Cormac Hugh MacMahon, TU Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
Philip Owende, TU Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.