Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Sustain.
Sec. Circular Economy
Volume 5 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/frsus.2024.1456302
This article is part of the Research Topic Modeling the Circular Economy: Interdisciplinary Quantitative Approaches to Support and Monitor the Transition towards Circular Product Life Cycles View all articles

Going circular with what we wear and how we build: Parallelisms between the Dutch and French Catwalks of Fashion and Construction

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Heerlen, Netherlands
  • 2 Sustainable International Business Research Center, Zuyd Univeristy, Maastricht, Netherlands
  • 3 École de Commerce Skema, Lille, Nord-Pas-de-Calais, France

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Responding to the call for circular transition, the Dutch and French governments aspire to achieve a fully circular economy by developing a transitional agenda in various sectors that include fashion and construction. The two countries are among the top 10 waste generators in the EU while the two sectors -fashion and construction -are the largest polluters in the EU. The aim of this study, and its main contribution, is to harmonize circular design principles which vary by sector into common types and identify the circular design principle which balances the sustainability dimensions the most. This responds to research gaps that merely describe these design principles applicable to different sectors, but which are silent as well on which achieves sustainability balance. Using multi-criteria decision analysis, selected case studies of companies in the two sectors and countries were scored and ranked according to environmental, economic, and social indicators of sustainability. The case projects were selected based on the circular design principle that the enterprises were applying. These principles were standardized for the two sectors to come up with five distinct types, namely, design for: (i) bio-based materials, (ii) service/ adaptability; (iii) disassembly, (iv) waste and material recovery, and (v) longevity. Three forms of triangulation were used to achieve reliability, validity and equivalence of the findings: (i) Data -by doubling the size of the sample cases to 40 establishments from 20; (ii) investigatorby having the authors score the projects separately; and (iii) method -by using two objective weighting methods in scoring the criteria. These techniques resulted in similar rankings of the cases in terms of triple bottom line scores per design principle. Designing for bio-based materials turned out to achieve the most balance. The case projects were also compared in terms of performance in achieving the UN Sustainability Development Goals (SDGs) which companies use to integrate sustainability with business. Circularity in fashion and construction primarily target responsible consumption and production, and climate action. A tertiary SDG was life on water and access to clean water for fashion; and life on land and sustainable cities for construction.

    Keywords: Circular design, Triple bottom line, sdgs, balanced sustainability, fashion, Construction

    Received: 28 Jun 2024; Accepted: 26 Aug 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Dytianquin, Paindavoine and Kalogeras. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Norman Dytianquin, Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Heerlen, Netherlands

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.