The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Sustain.
Sec. Waste Management
Volume 5 - 2024 |
doi: 10.3389/frsus.2024.1455480
Plastic waste characterisation to maximise landfill diversion from a New Zealand residential construction site
Provisionally accepted- 1 Environmental Innovation Centre (EIC), Auckland, Northland, New Zealand
- 2 Environmental Solutions Research Centre, Unitec - part of Te PÅ«kenga, Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
- 3 Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
In New Zealand, the construction sector is responsible for a large proportion of waste sent to landfill. The plastic profile of construction waste is varied and complex in comparison to other waste types (e.g. timber, concrete, metals, plasterboard). Therefore, the diversion of plastics from landfills is less straightforward, and there are less obvious benefits to recycling this low-density, low-value waste stream. Plastic waste generated by construction activities has not been well-characterised, which has affected opportunities for waste reduction, reuse and recycling. To fill this knowledge gap, this study characterised the plastic waste generated from a residential construction site. This was used to identify opportunities to address the full waste hierarchy through reduction, reuse and recycling and ultimately enable more sustainable plastic waste management.Plastic waste generated from a construction site in Auckland, New Zealand (construction of eight terraced houses) was separated during the project. This was followed by in-depth auditing which further sorted waste types by main composition, followed by analysis for polymer type. The research was phased to determine the plastic waste generated across each of the main construction stages. Once the main polymer types had been identified, local waste providers were contacted to establish opportunities for reuse or recycling. The total mass of plastics generated from all construction stages was 725 kg, 66.4% (by wt.) of which was recycled. Soft plastics, predominantly low-density polyethylene, were the most common plastic type; this was followed by pipes and expanded polystyrene. Plastic packaging, primarily soft plastics and polystyrene, accounted for 60% of total plastics and were mostly generated in the final stages of construction (i.e. fittings and fit-out). This characterisation of construction plastic waste can be used to demonstrate the feasibility of sustainable plastic waste management in Auckland and to identify construction plastic waste sources on an international scale. More studies on a variety of construction types (e.g. detached residential, apartment blocks, commercial) are required to address the full breadth of plastic materials used and to drive a more circular economy for this potential resource.
Keywords: Construction waste, plastic recycling, material composition, Waste generation rate, Residential construction, Waste audit, on-site separation
Received: 26 Jun 2024; Accepted: 11 Nov 2024.
Copyright: © 2024 Low, Hernandez and Berry. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Joanne K Low, Environmental Innovation Centre (EIC), Auckland, Northland, New Zealand
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.