Skip to main content

MINI REVIEW article

Front. Surg.

Sec. Visceral Surgery

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1576422

Quantifying Lens Obstructions in Minimally Invasive Surgery: The Impact on Performance and Outcomes

Provisionally accepted
Maciej Łącki Maciej Łącki 1Megha Kalia Megha Kalia 1Nidhi Abraham Nidhi Abraham 1Sukesh Adiga Vasudeva Sukesh Adiga Vasudeva 1Dicken S C Ko Dicken S C Ko 2Timothée Bernard Timothée Bernard 1Amy Lorincz Amy Lorincz 1*
  • 1 Vope Medical, Montréal, Canada
  • 2 Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Surgeons performing laparoscopic surgery depend primarily on their vision to operate, but it often gets obstructed by fog, smoke, and other debris. This mini-review examines the literature on lens obstruction, aiming to quantify its prevalence, identify factors affecting its frequency, evaluate its impacts on surgeons and patients, and present an overview of mitigation methods.The review reveals that there are typically between 3.5-15 lens obstruction events per procedure, and surgeons spend between 19% and 52% of the procedure with suboptimal vision. Additionally, 2% to 8% of the operating time is devoted to cleaning the scope. Factors influencing the frequency of lens obstructions include instrument selection, operating time, and surgeon experience. Lens obstructions may increase operating time, the risk of medical errors, and mental fatigue, though quantifiable results on this subject remain sparse. The review also highlights significant knowledge gaps in the field of lens obstructions during minimally invasive procedures and proposes several recommendations to accelerate research in this area.

    Keywords: Surgical visualization, Lens Occlusion, Lens fogging, Laparoscopy, lens cleaning, Surgical performance, operating time, robot assisted surgery

    Received: 13 Feb 2025; Accepted: 18 Mar 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Łącki, Kalia, Abraham, Vasudeva, Ko, Bernard and Lorincz. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Amy Lorincz, Vope Medical, Montréal, Canada

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more