
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Surg.
Sec. Genitourinary Surgery
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1573548
This article is part of the Research Topic Prevention and Treatment of Urolithiasis: Innovation and Novel Techniques View all 3 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Objective: To compare the safety and efficacy of four different surgical approaches for the treatment of complex non-hydronephrotic renal stones. Methods: A total of 88 patients with complex non-hydronephrotic renal stones, who underwent surgical treatment at Xiangtan Central Hospital from January 2022 to December 2023, were included in this study. The patients were divided into two groups based on their CT values. Group 1 (CT ≥ 1000) included 22 patients who underwent puncture-assisted single standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) with a laser for stone fragmentation and retrieval (experimental group), and 12 patients who underwent multi-standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy (control group). Group 2 (CT < 1000) included 21 patients who underwent puncture-assisted single standard PCNL combined with ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy (experimental group), and 33 patients who underwent transurethral ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy (control group). The surgical variables including intraoperative blood loss, operative time, hospital stay, stone clearance rate, and postoperative complications were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using chi-square test or Fisher's exact test for categorical data, and t-test for continuous data. Results: The two groups were comparable in terms of age, sex, BMI, hypertension, coronary heart disease, diabetes, and preoperative white blood cell count (P > 0.01). In both CT ≥ 1000 and CT < 1000 groups, the experimental group had significantly less intraoperative blood loss, shorter operative time, and shorter hospital stay compared to the control group (P < 0.01). In the CT ≥ 1000 control group, the stone clearance rate was higher, and two cases of postoperative bleeding (considered arteriovenous fistula) were managed with interventional embolization. In the CT < 1000 control group, the stone clearance rate was lower, and three cases of postoperative fever (with a maximum temperature of 39.5°C) required an extended antibiotic course for 7 days before discharge. Conclusion: For complex non-hydronephrotic renal stones, a CT value ≥ 1000 should be treated with single standard PCNL using a puncture-assisted method; a CT value < 1000 is better treated with a combination of puncture-assisted single standard PCNL and ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy, with higher safety and efficacy.
Keywords: Needle nephroscope, Ureteroscope, combined, Standard channel, Complex non-obstructing renal stones.
Received: 09 Feb 2025; Accepted: 11 Mar 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 xinyu and jin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
li jin, Xiangtan Central Hospital, Xiangtan, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.