ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Surg.
Sec. Orthopedic Surgery
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1568285
Bone Transport with Unilateral External Fixator for Humeral Defect Reconstruction: A Retrospective Analysis of Post-Traumatic Osteomyelitis
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Microrepair and Reconstructive Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China
- 2Imaging Center of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China
- 3Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background Large humeral defects resulting from post-traumatic osteomyelitis present significant challenges in orthopedic reconstruction. This study evaluates the efficacy of bone transport using a unilateral external fixator for treating such defects.Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 15 patients (9 males, 6 females; mean age 29.3 ± 11.7 years) with humeral defects due to post-traumatic osteomyelitis, treated between January 2017 and January 2021. The mean defect size was 7.2 ± 1.4 cm (range, 5.3-9.8 cm). All patients underwent bone transport using a unilateral external fixator. Primary outcomes included external fixation time (EFT), external fixation index (EFI), and bone healing time. Secondary outcomes comprised ASAMI bone and functional scores, DASH scores, range of motion, and complications.The mean EFT was 342.5 ± 35.6 days (range, 290-410 days), and the mean EFI was 47.5 ± 3.8 days/cm (range, 42-54 days/cm). Bone union was achieved in all cases, with a mean healing time of 11.4 ± 1.2 months (range, 9.5-13.5 months). ASAMI bone results were excellent in 10 patients (66.7%) and good in 4 (26.7%).ASAMI functional results showed excellent outcomes in 8 patients (53.3%) and good in 5 (33.3%). The mean DASH score improved significantly from 35.2 ± 3.6 preoperatively to 15.5 ± 3.2 at final follow-up (P < 0.001). Complications occurred in 7 patients (46.7%), with pin site infections being the most common (26.7%).Bone transport using a unilateral external fixator demonstrates efficacy in treating large humeral defects due to post-traumatic osteomyelitis, yielding good to excellent bone and functional outcomes with manageable complications. These findings extend previous research, highlighting the technique's efficacy in achieving both bone union and functional restoration. This approach deserves consideration as a primary treatment option for complex humeral reconstruction cases, particularly when traditional methods may be insufficient.
Keywords: Bone transport, Distraction osteogenesis, Ilizarov Technique, Humeral defect, Osteomyelitis
Received: 29 Jan 2025; Accepted: 23 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Hamiti, Abudureyimu, Lyu, Yusufu and Yushan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Aihemaitijiang Yusufu, Department of Microrepair and Reconstructive Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China
Maimaiaili Yushan, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.