
95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Surg.
Sec. Reconstructive and Plastic Surgery
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1562190
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of gasless and single-port gas-insufflation transaxillary approaches in subcutaneous mastectomy for treating patients with gynecomastia (GM).Methods: This study enrolled 46 patients with GM from May 2022 to October 2023. Twenty patients underwent subcutaneous mastectomy using the single-port gas-insufflation transaxillary approach (gasinsufflation group), while the other 26 patients received the same procedure through the gasless transaxillary approach (gasless group). This study further conducted inter-group comparisons in terms of the operation time, intraoperative bleeding, volume of postoperative drainage, timing of drainage tube removal, short-term postoperative complications, length of postoperative hospital stay, and medical costs.Results: All the 46 patients completed the operation successfully without conversion to open surgery, with confirmed diagnosis of GM through pathology. The average surgical time for the gasless group was significantly shorter than that of the gas-insufflation group (38.20±10.773 vs. 62.96±15.311 minutes, P<0.01). There were no significant differences between groups in incision length, intraoperative bleeding, unilateral postoperative drainage volume, drainage tube retention time, length of postoperative hospital stay, or postoperative cosmetic outcomes (all P>0.05).This study supports the clinical feasibility of using gasless transaxillary approach for subcutaneous mastectomy of patients with GM.
Keywords: Gynecomastia, Subcutaneous mastectomy, endoscopic, surgical efficacy, postoperative recovery
Received: 17 Jan 2025; Accepted: 24 Mar 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Zhang, Wang, Wu, He, Liu, Xiao, zeng and Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Chaojie Zhang, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital, Changsha, 410005, Hunan Province, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.