Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Surg.
Sec. Visceral Surgery
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1516709
This article is part of the Research Topic 10th Anniversary of Frontiers in Surgery: Celebrating Progress and Envisioning the Future of Multidisciplinary Surgery View all 6 articles

Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Improves Safety in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Using the Fundus First Technique: A Retrospective Study

Provisionally accepted
Susanna Haverinen Susanna Haverinen 1,2*Evelina Pajus Evelina Pajus 3Gabriel Sandblom Gabriel Sandblom 1,4Yücel Cengiz Yücel Cengiz 2,3
  • 1 Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet (KI), Stockholm, Sweden
  • 2 Sundsvall Hospital, Sundsvall, Västernorrland, Sweden
  • 3 Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Västerbotten, Sweden
  • 4 Stockholm South General Hospital, Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Introduction: As one of the most commonly performed surgeries in the world, safety during LC is of utmost importance. Indocyanine green (ICG) has been used for different medical purposes including assessment of liver function since the 1950s. Its use during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) was first described in 2009 by Ishizawa. Since ICG is excreted in the bile, its fluorescent properties can be used to illuminate the bile ducts, and may reduce the risk for bile duct injury and other complications. Previous studies have compared ICG with conventional visualization showing shorter operation time and lower conversion rates during LC performed with traditional operation techniques. Results from LC performed with the Fundus First method (FF-LC) and ICG fluorescence has not been previously reported. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare LC with and without the aid of ICG fluorescence at a Swedish hospital routinely performing FF-LC.Methods: Data from all patients operated with LC at Sundsvall General Hospital before and after the implementation of routine ICG between 2016 and 2023 were analyzed.Results: The study included 2009 patients; 1455 operated with ICG (ICG-group) and 549 without (comparison group). FF-LC was used in 94.9% of all operations. The groups were comparable regarding gender, BMI, age, presence of acute cholecystitis and proportion urgent/elective surgery. ICG was found to be safe, with similar 30-day complication rates between study groups. A lower conversion rate was seen in the ICG-group (1.2% vs 3.3%, p=0.001) and there was a non-significant reduction in readmissions (p=0.054). In univariate analysis, ICG was associated with prolonged operation time, but this was not supported in multivariate analysis. Time to cholangiography was prolonged in the ICG-group in both univariate and multivariate analyses. Discussion: ICG fluorescence is an adjunct that could improve the operative safety. Implementation of routine ICG fluorescence at this Swedish hospital was found to be safe and efficient, suggesting improvement in safety during FF-LC. Further studies are needed to see if ICG increases safety in LC.

    Keywords: Indocyanine Green1, Fluorescent cholangiography2, Laparoscopic cholecystectomy3, Fundus First4, Cholangiography5

    Received: 24 Oct 2024; Accepted: 09 Jan 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Haverinen, Pajus, Sandblom and Cengiz. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Susanna Haverinen, Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet (KI), Stockholm, Sweden

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.