ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Surg.

Sec. Obstetrics and Gynecological Surgery

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1488775

This article is part of the Research TopicCurrent Advances in the Understanding and Management of Pelvic Organ ProlapseView all 4 articles

Cystopexy raises the post-operative complication rate during laparoscopic hysterectomy for uterine prolapse

Provisionally accepted
Carlo  RonsiniCarlo Ronsini1*Giada  AndreoliGiada Andreoli2Paola  RomeoPaola Romeo3Giuseppe  SarpietroGiuseppe Sarpietro4Marco  TorellaMarco Torella2Clorinda  VitaleClorinda Vitale2Stefano  CianciStefano Cianci3
  • 1Dipartimento della Donna, del Bambino e di Chirurgia Generale e Specialistica, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
  • 2Department of Women, Children And General and Specialist Surgery, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Campania, Italy
  • 3Department of Human Pathology in Adulthood and Childhood Gaetano Barresi, University of Messina, Messina, Sicily, Italy
  • 4Department of General Surgery and Medical Surgical Specialties, Policlinico San Marco, Catania, Sicily, Italy

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objectives: This study aims to compare the outcomes of laparoscopic colposuspension sec Shull (LCSS) and laparoscopic colposacropexy (LCSP) with and without the addition of cystopexy for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in terms of postoperative complications, recurrence rates, and overall effectiveness.Materials and Methods: A retrospective case-control analysis was conducted on women treated for grade 3-4 POP-Q uterine prolapse at the Academic Departments of Gynaecology and Obstetrics of "G. Martino" of Messina, Italy, and "L. Vanvitelli" of Napoli, Italy, between November 2020 and February 2022. Group A consisted of patients who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy followed by LCSS or LCSP without cystopexy. At the same time, Group B included patients who had the same procedures with the addition of cystopexy. Data on complications were collected using the Clavien-Dindo classification, and prolapse recurrence was monitored according to the POP-Q system. Statistical analysis was performed using Fisher's exact, Chi-squared, and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests.Results: A total of 148 patients were included, with 125 in Group A and 23 in Group B. Group B showed a significantly higher rate of postoperative complications (16%) compared to Group A (2.4%) (p=0.016), with an Odds Ratio of 7.62 (95% CI 1.59-36.51, p= 0.0017). No significant difference between the groups was found in the recurrence rate of prolapse at 24 months (p>0.9).Conclusion: Adding cystopexy to LCSS or LCSP increases the risk of postoperative complications without reducing prolapse recurrence rates. Further research is needed to identify patients who may benefit from cystopexy and to evaluate its impact on stress incontinence and patient satisfaction.

Keywords: Obstetrics and Gynecological Surgery Data curation, investigation, Writing -original draft. Carlo Ronsini: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, methodology, project administration, Software, supervision

Received: 30 Aug 2024; Accepted: 16 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Ronsini, Andreoli, Romeo, Sarpietro, Torella, Vitale and Cianci. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Carlo Ronsini, Dipartimento della Donna, del Bambino e di Chirurgia Generale e Specialistica, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more