Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Surg.
Sec. Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1471526
This article is part of the Research Topic Advancements in Diagnostic Tools and Techniques for Improved Septoplasty Success View all articles

Septoplasty: Defining a desirable clinical outcome according to baseline symptom scores

Provisionally accepted
Rolf Haye Rolf Haye 1,2*Liv Kari Døsen Liv Kari Døsen 1Magnus Tarangen Magnus Tarangen 1Caryl Gay Caryl Gay 1Are Hugo Pripp Are Hugo Pripp 2Olga Shiryaeva Olga Shiryaeva 1
  • 1 Lovisenberg Diakonale Sykehus, Oslo, Norway
  • 2 Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Nordland, Norway

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Objective. Results of septoplasty are usually measured with assessments of symptom severity immediately before and some months after surgery. Global ratings of surgical outcome can be used to clinically evaluate changes in symptom severity. Important to the patient are ratings such as "satisfied", "successful" or "much improved". We like to refer to such ratings as the Desirable Clinically Important Difference (DCID). Global clinical ratings have been established for whole cohorts but not for individual baseline scores. Our aim was to investigate how the DCID relates to baseline ratings of nasal obstruction, which can then be used to assess individual results.preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively. A global rating of outcome (completely, much, or somewhat improved, unchanged, or worse) served as the anchor postoperatively. The Conclusion. A 49% improvement from baseline would be a clinical success for a patient with moderately-obstructed nasal breathing, whereas 61% improvement is needed with very severe obstruction. The relative DCID can be a guide to assess improvement following septoplasty according to baseline scores of nasal obstruction and in planning of surgery.

    Keywords: Patient Outcome Assessment, nasal surgical procedure, Nasal Obstruction, Clinical Audit, ROC Curve

    Received: 27 Jul 2024; Accepted: 21 Jan 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Haye, Døsen, Tarangen, Gay, Pripp and Shiryaeva. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Rolf Haye, Lovisenberg Diakonale Sykehus, Oslo, Norway

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.