ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Surg.
Sec. Orthopedic Surgery
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1454101
This article is part of the Research TopicSurgical Advances in Orthopedic Trauma: A Biomechanical ApproachView all 4 articles
Union rate and clinical outcomes of second-try scaphoid reconstructions after failed primary scaphoid osteosynthesis or reconstruction. A retrospective, single-center cohort study of 52 patients
Provisionally accepted- 1BG Klinik Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- 2Department of Hand, Plastic, Reconstructive and Burn Surgery, BG Clinic Tuebingen, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Scaphoid non-union after failed primary surgery presents significant therapeutic challenges. In this retrospective study, 52 patients (50 males; mean age 29.5 years) underwent secondary reconstructions (2009–2020) for proximal pole (38.5%, n=20) and waist non-unions (61.5%, n=32). Treatments included non-vascularized iliac crest grafts (17 patients), vascularized pedicled distal radius grafts (26), and free medial femoral condyle flaps (9). Union and scaphoid alignment were assessed by CT, while carpal alignment and arthrosis were evaluated using radiographs. Statistical analysis employed chi-square, Fisher’s exact, Mann-Whitney U, and McNemar tests (R v4.4.2; p≤0.05).Union rates differed significantly between proximal pole (40%, 8/20) and waist non-unions (68.75%, 22/32; p=0.04). Graft type (p=0.616), osteosynthesis method (p=0.827), age (p=0.095), smoking (p=0.582), avascular necrosis (p=0.42), and prior surgeries (p=0.974) showed no significant association with union. Proximal pole non-unions with AVN trended toward lower union (22.2% vs. 54.5% without AVN), though this was not statistically significant. In patients achieving union, scaphoid humpback deformity was corrected in 9/15 cases (p=0.0348), and dorsal intercalated segment instability improved significantly (p=0.0143).Functionally, the union group had an average extension-flexion of 112° (81% of the healthy wrist) and radial-/ulnar adduction of 40° (72% of the unaffected wrist), with grip strength averaging 42 kg (range 25.2–59.7) and a DASH score of 11 (range 0–67). The non-union group showed 114° extension-flexion (91% of the unaffected wrist) and 38° ulnar/radial abduction (78% of the healthy wrist), with grip strength averaging 46 kg (range 37.6–59.3; 89% of the unaffected wrist) and a DASH score of 10 (range 3–33). Secondary scaphoid reconstruction demonstrates location-dependent success. The decision between secondary reconstruction, which aims to restore anatomical integrity, and salvage procedures, which prioritize predictable outcomes, hinges on balancing union potential, functional results, and patient preferences. A tailored approach remains essential to align treatment goals with individual needs.
Keywords: Scaphoid non-union, SNAC wrist, Scaphoid reconstruction, repeated scaphoid reconstruction, bone grafting, Wrist
Received: 24 Jun 2024; Accepted: 22 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Rachunek-Medved, Illg, Einzmann, Thiel, Daigeler and Medved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Katarzyna Rachunek-Medved, BG Klinik Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.