The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
EDITORIAL article
Front. Surg.
Sec. Neurosurgery
Volume 11 - 2024 |
doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1536176
This article is part of the Research Topic Training and Education in Neurosurgery: Strategies and Challenges for the Next Ten Years Volume II View all 11 articles
Training and Education in Neurosurgery: Strategies and Challenges for the Next Ten Years, Volume II
Provisionally accepted- 1 ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milan, Italy
- 2 Ospedale Moriggia Pelascini, Gravedona ed Uniti, Italy
Training and education are indeed the driving forces behind gaining experience, whether it involves learning to tie the first knot, reading an article, or performing a difficult case. Every step (and misstep!) moves us further along the path of experience. So, the magic formula is as simple as "experience = training x education"? Again, it cannot be. If that were the case, we probably wouldn't have made significant progress since the early days of neurosurgery, with only some exceptional performers emerging from a pool of mediocre peers. On the contrary, we believe that true progress is achieving a consistently high level of reliable performance from any given neurosurgeon.In this context, beyond knowledge-sharing, one specific factor has driven the progress of medicine in general, elevating the performances of the majority us, normally skilled suregons: technological development. For example, Professor H. W. Cushing achieved unprecedented levels of survival and functional preservation in his time. However, advancements like electrical cautery and microscopic techniques made it significantly easier to achieve those outcomes just a few decades later. Similarly, Professor G. M. Yasargil reported that an experienced surgeon could "feel" with his instruments the difference between high-grade gliomas and the surrounding brain tissue at the interface. Nowadays, fluorophores, intraoperative imaging, and neuronavigation (such as 5-ALA or fluorescein) allow anyone to gain that insight. (2) Lastly, Professor C. G. Drake could effortlessly interpret the anatomy of an aneurysm from simple 2D angiographic projections. Today, a first-year resident can do so just as easily by examining a modern 3D rendering, even in a virtual or mixed-reality setting. (3) This list could go on, but the message is clear: technology repeatedly empowered surgeons with "experience" and will, hopefully, continue to do so even more over the next ten years.What will the next game-changing advancement be, then? We believe that one of the most significant ongoing revolutions is the use of modern technology in training and education.We are finally moving beyond the traditional paradigm of books-lessons-cadavers-patients, overcoming many of its limitations through technology. For example, anatomy is now studied not only through textbooks but also via 3D renderings of normal and pathological imaging, enabling immersive experiences on smartphones (3). Lessons are widely accessible online, and interesting surgical cases are shared daily on social media platforms. Moreover, some of the ethical and logistical constraints of cadaver training are now addressed with advanced training models that do not suffer from postmortem tissue atrophy and allow for repeated practice (4)(5). Additionally, new technologies enable progress tracking, measuring the "gain of experience" in unprecedented ways (6). In this data-driven era, focused on performance metrics, transparency, and accountability, these advancements will undoubtedly be critical. Furthermore, they facilitate knowledge-sharing, a cornerstone of excellence in care. In this context, in this Reasearch Topic we present examples of how technology aids in selecting surgical approaches (7), navigating anatomical structures (4,5), and evaluating trainees' performances (6,8). Moreover, regarding education, we showcase how technology boosts engagement and motivation among future neurosurgeons, from medical students (9) to residents (10) and even fully trained surgeons. This empowerment also is proved to extend to patient education (11) and operating room staff (4), ensuring that everyone involved stays informed and engaged. Knowledge and experience, after all, are only valuable when shared: I learn from many, and many can learn from me. Individualism and self-referentiality must be avoided at all costs. The next ten years, with technological improvements in training devices and in inter-peer communication, will undoubtly be bound to these mantras.In conclusion, the articles in this collection (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11) clearly show that modern neurosurgical training and education are far from merely playing with "fancy plastic toys" or indulging in technological gimmicks. They involve respectfully avoiding unnecessary cadaver or patient manipulations while enabling measurable training and enhanced knowledge-sharing.Returning to our original question, in light of these considerations, we propose the following formula for a great neurosurgeon (figure 1)
Keywords: training, Education, neurodurgery, Technology, simulation
Received: 28 Nov 2024; Accepted: 06 Dec 2024.
Copyright: © 2024 Bongetta and Zoia. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Daniele Bongetta, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milan, Italy
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.