Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Surg.
Sec. Orthopedic Surgery
Volume 11 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1510094

Surgical Options for Evans-Jensen Type IV Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures in the Elderly Over 65: A Comparison Between Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) and Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA)

Provisionally accepted
Zhencun Cai Zhencun Cai 1*Ming Sun Ming Sun 1Hai-Rui Liang Hai-Rui Liang 1He Zhang He Zhang 2Tong Bai Tong Bai 3Rong-Da Xu Rong-Da Xu 1Si-Yu Duan Si-Yu Duan 1
  • 1 Central Hospital Affiliated to Shenyang Medical College, Shenyang, China
  • 2 Tongliao People's Hospital, Tongliao, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China
  • 3 Ninth People’s Hospital of Shenyang, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background: Currently, there is no clear standard for the surgical options for Evans-Jensen Type IV intertrochanteric femur fractures in elderly patients over 65 years old. This study aims to retrospectively analyze and compare the early postoperative limb function and quality of life of patients treated with total hip arthroplasty (THA) and proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) for this type of fracture. We hypothesize that there is no significant difference in complications and postoperative recovery between the two surgical methods.A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients over 65 years old with Evans-Jensen Type IV intertrochanteric femur fractures who were treated between 2020 and 2023. The patients were divided into two groups based on the treatment method: the PFNA group (20 cases) and the THA group (20 cases). General patient information, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, time to postoperative mobilization, time to weight-bearing on the affected limb, Harris hip scores at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively, excellent and good rates, SF-36 scores, and postoperative complications were recorded.Results: Compared to the PFNA group, the THA group had a longer operative time (86.7±9.6 vs. 51.5±5.3 minutes, p<0.001) and more intraoperative blood loss (212.0±35.5 vs. 76.5±16.1 ml, p<0.001). However, the THA group had an earlier time to first postoperative mobilization (3.1±1.4 vs. 43.3±13.09 days, p<0.001) and earlier time to full weight-bearing on the affected limb (33.5±3.1 vs. 77.9±12.0 days, p<0.001). The Harris hip scores and SF-36 scores at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively were higher in the THA group (p<0.05 for all). There was no significant difference in the overall incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups (p=0.41).For elderly patients over 65 years old with Evans-Jensen Type IV intertrochanteric femur fractures, especially those with underlying diseases who cannot tolerate prolonged bed rest, hip replacement surgery (THA) may be preferred. Postoperative patients can begin rehabilitation exercises earlier, preventing the exacerbation of internal medical conditions.Early recovery of hip function on the affected side is faster, and the quality of life of patients is higher.

    Keywords: Intertrochanteric fracture, Proximal femoral nail antirotation, Total hip arthroplasty, Evans-Jensen Type IV, Geriatric medicine

    Received: 16 Oct 2024; Accepted: 20 Dec 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Cai, Sun, Liang, Zhang, Bai, Xu and Duan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Zhencun Cai, Central Hospital Affiliated to Shenyang Medical College, Shenyang, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.