Skip to main content

REVIEW article

Front. Surg.
Sec. Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
Volume 11 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1415485

SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF BENIGN TUMORS OF THE PAROTID GLAND: THE ADVANTAGES OF EXTRACAPSULAR DISSECTION COMPARED TO TRADITIONAL SURGICAL TECHNIQUES

Provisionally accepted
Antonio Zanghi Antonio Zanghi 1*Andrea Sebastiano Cavallaro Andrea Sebastiano Cavallaro 2Martine Marchi Martine Marchi 3Marcello Marchi Marcello Marchi 3Luigi La Via Luigi La Via 4FILIPPO SANFILIPPO FILIPPO SANFILIPPO 4Alessandro Cappellani Alessandro Cappellani 2Simone Di Majo Simone Di Majo 2
  • 1 Department of Medical, Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies G.F. Ingrassia, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
  • 2 Dipartimento di Chirurgia Generale e Specialità Medico-Chirurgiche, Università degli Studi di Catania, Catania, Sicily, Italy
  • 3 Policlinico Morgagni Catania, Pedara, Italy
  • 4 Policlinico San Marco, Zingonia, Italy

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Among all head and neck neoplasms, salivary gland tumors account for only 3% to 6 % of cases. Most salivary gland tumors (70%) are found in the parotid. Their location is mostly in the more abundant superficial portion of the parotid gland, lying lateral to the facial nerve. For many years the presence of the facial nerve between the superficial and deep segments of the parotid gland served as a deterrent to adequate tumor extirpation. Different surgical options are available for treating benign tumors of the parotid gland, but there is still no universal agreement on what the optimal surgical treatment is. In the first half of the XX century tumor enucleation was performed as a standard surgical treatment of parotid tumors to preserve the facial nerve, but high recurrence rates were the main downside of this procedure. In order to improve the outcome, superficial parotidectomy was implemented including in the tumor excision the whole lateral segment of the parotid gland, superficial to the facial nerve. Nonetheless, even this improved surgical procedure may lead to severe postoperative complications in a considerable proportion of patients such as facial nerve paralysis. Over later years more gland-preserving techniques were developed in the quest for reduction of complication rates, improving the safety of procedures and patients' satisfaction, without increasing the risk of recurrence. This study compares our surgical experience with extracapsular dissection-gland sparing surgery (ECD) to more traditional superficial parotidectomy on 56 patients who underwent surgery performed by the same surgical team. The superiority of ECD procedures compared to SP procedures was shown as far as total complication rates is concerned. In this case Fisher exact test statistic value was 0.0043 (significant at p < 0.05). ECD should be applied in properly selected cases and further prospective studies may clarify the optimal indications.

    Keywords: salivary gland, tumor, Surgery, Extracapsular dissection, Parotid Gland, Benign neoplasia

    Received: 10 Apr 2024; Accepted: 24 Jun 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Zanghi, Cavallaro, Marchi, Marchi, La Via, SANFILIPPO, Cappellani and Di Majo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Antonio Zanghi, Department of Medical, Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies G.F. Ingrassia, University of Catania, Catania, Italy

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.