Mohammed A. Hassan1Rawa Bapir1,2,3Ismaeil Aghaways1,4Nali H. Hama2,4Mohammed Fahad Raheem1Wirya N. Sabr2Bilal A. Mohammed2Honar Othman Kareem2Ayman M. Mustafa2
Fahmi H. Kakamad2,3,4*
- 1Urological Department, Sulaimani Teaching Hospital, Sulaimani, Iraq
- 2Scientific Affairs Department, Smart Health Tower, Madam Mitterrand Street, Sulaimani, Iraq
- 3Kscien Organization for Scientific Research (Middle East Office), Sulaimani, Iraq
- 4Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Sulaimani, Sulaimani, Iraq
Introduction: A Urethral diverticulum can be defined as sac-like dilation lined with epithelial tissue, which may be congenital or acquired. It usually develops in the penoscrotal angle region but can also be observed in the penile urethra. It usually occurs in female teenagers. This report aims to discuss a male infant with a large urethral diverticulum.
Case presentation: A 5-month-old male presented to the urological department at Sulaimani Teaching Hospital with a penile swelling that had been noticeable since birth. Clinical examination revealed a ventral cystic penile shaft swelling, which would fill with fluid during urination. A urethrocystoscopy was performed and showed a wide cystic ventral diverticulum. Diverticulectomy was performed as a surgical approach to remove the diverticulum.
Discussion: Congenital anterior urethral diverticulum is an uncommon condition that typically begins in early life. It can manifest with various symptoms, like recurrent infections of the urinary tract, painful urination, and post-void urine dribbling. Diagnosis involves imaging, with urethrocystoscopy, to rule out other potential diagnoses. Different surgical techniques exist that show promising results in preventing recurrence. The current case involved diverticulectomy and multi-layered wound closure with a dartos flap.
Conclusion: Large anterior diverticulum in early infancy is rare but possible; operation is the preferred intervention method.
Introduction
A urethral diverticulum can be described as a sac-like dilation lined with epithelial tissue that is distinct from the urethra but connects to its inner space via a specific opening (1). These are rare occurrences in male children, manifesting either congenitally or acquired, with acquired cases being more prevalent (2, 3). It is typically developing at the early onset of life but can occur at any time, with the average age of onset being around 13 years old (4, 5). It was first identified by Watts in 1906 (2).
The clinical presentation varies depending on the patient's age and the urinary obstruction. Typical symptoms in adults may include diminished urinary flow, leakage after urination, recurrent urinary tract infections (UTIs), and penile swelling ventrally. While in neonates and infants, CAUD frequently displays non-specific symptoms like fever, diarrhea, and vomiting (6). A congenital anterior urethral diverticulum (CAUD) diagnosis is made through obstructive lower urinary tract symptoms, often accompanied by a penoscrotal mass. Typically, this diagnosis is confirmed through retrograde urethrogram or Micturating Cystourethrogram (2). It can be challenging to differentiate CAUD from anterior urethral valve (AUV) due to their causal relationship. The diverticulum linked to AUV is generally regarded as a non-authentic diverticulum since, in CAUD, there is an acute angle primarily between the proximal part of the expanded area and the ventral floor (penoscrotal angle region). In contrast, this acute angle is absent in AUV (7, 8).
Anterior congenital urethral diverticulum often develops in areas with a deficiency in the Corpus cavernosum urethrae, resulting in a thin-walled urethra (9). Treatment decisions depend on symptom severity, diverticulum size, and associated upper urinary tract changes. Observation may suffice for mild cases, while more severe cases may necessitate endoscopic or open surgical removal (1). Controversy exists regarding the surgical approach for managing the condition, which involves performing diverticulectomy with or without urethroplasty based on the size of the developed diverticulum and the endoscopic approach (2). In this study, a case of CAUD in a 5-month-old boy is reported, along with a discussion on the disease's presentation and management.
Case presentation
Patient information
A 5-month-old male presented to the Sulaimani Teaching Hospital with a penile swelling that had been noticeable since birth (Figure 1). The swelling had gradually increased and appeared to grow as the baby continued to develop, especially during micturition.
Figure 1. Shows a skin flap over the ventral surface of the penis.
Clinical findings
Clinical examination revealed a ventral cystic penile shaft swelling, which would fill with fluid during urination.
Diagnostic approach
To further evaluate the patient's condition, a urethrocystoscopy was performed. This diagnostic procedure revealed a large ventral urethral diverticulum located approximately 1.5 cm proximal to the fossa navicularis. The defect due to the diverticulum was estimated to be about 2 cm, which helped confirm the diagnosis.
Therapeutic intervention
Under general anesthesia, the patient was placed in a supine position; a Foley catheter was inserted. A vertical ventral penile shaft incision was made at the site of the bulging area. During the procedure, the surgical team dissected through the layers of skin, dartos fascia, areolar tissue, and penis fascia. This dissection identified a very thin corpus spongiosum, dissected further until the urethral diverticulum was reached and opened vertically. Stay sutures were placed at the edges of the diverticulum wall (Figure 2). The diverticulum was removed and the urethra sutured, then a dartos flap was utilized to cover the suture line of the urethra (Figure 3).
Figure 2. Intra-operative picture showing walls of the diverticulum.
Figure 3. The post-operative appearance of the penis after diverticulectomy and closure.
Postoperative outcome
A 4-month follow-up revealed an uneventful recovery, with the suture line well-covered by a dartos flap.
Discussion
The cause of CAUD is not yet completely understood, although several theories have been suggested to explain its formation (3). One theory suggests that they develop due to a partial absence or absence of the spongy body, often associated with hypospadias that led to urethral dilation. Another theory proposes that during embryogenesis, the urethral diverticulum forms due to epidermal pockets that communicate with the ventral urethral wall. As the anterior urethral tube develops, congenital cysts may form within the urethral groove, potentially leading to the formation of a diverticulum through the spontaneous rupture of these cysts into the urethral lumen (1, 3).
Congenital urethral diverticulum in males is an uncommon condition. The number of reported cases among children is currently unknown. Over the past two decades, 260 cases have been reported in the genuine literature, with no distinct separation between AUV and CAUD (1, 7, 10). In the current study, the examination revealed cystic swelling in the penile shaft ventrally that had increased in size during urination; this condition had been noticeable since birth.
A thorough examination of a child's medical history will uncover that these children have experienced consistently poor urinary flow since birth, and a clear indicator of this issue is the presence of cystic swelling in the urethra of the penis (4). This is consistent with the condition explained in the current study.
Diagnosis of AUD or CAUD is typically established through MCUG (Micturating Cystourethrogram) or retrograde urethrogram, which is sufficient for directing the diverticulum's location, determining its size, and identifying any associated problems, such as urethral stenosis. The MCUG involves filling the bladder with contrast dye during urination to observe the flow and identify diverticulum morphology, providing dynamic imaging that highlights functional aspects of the urethra.
Retrograde urethrogram, on the other hand, involves injecting contrast dye directly into the urethra to visualize its anatomy and identify specific diverticula. This technique is particularly useful for detailed anatomical mapping and precise measurement of diverticulum size, aiding in surgical planning. Furthermore, in cases where uncertainty exists regarding alterations in anatomy resulting from the urethral diverticulum, additional imaging methods like magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may be required. It is particularly valuable for assessing soft tissue structures, such as identifying the extent of diverticulum involvement, evaluating adjacent organs, and detecting any associated anomalies or complications that may impact surgical management (2, 8). Furthermore, diverticula associated with anterior urethral valves (AUV) differ from true diverticula. These diverticula cause proximal deformation and dilation of the urethra. Additionally, syringocele of Cowper's duct can contribute, as it often communicates directly with the gland. Hence, these formations are termed pseudodiverticula (3, 11).
During surgery, intraoperative urethrocystoscopy enables direct observation of the diverticulum, which appears as a urethral dilatation of varying dimensions, characterized by the presence of the urethral mucosa and a connection through an opening to the urethral lumen. Babty et al. recommended urethrocystoscopy as a diagnostic approach for CAUD (2). In the current study, urethrocystoscopy was also used so that the patient could thoroughly examine both the urethra and bladder, and rule out other potential diagnoses.
There is controversy regarding the management of CAUD. A small AUD can be addressed through distal lip removal by transurethral endoscopy (6). A large diverticulum, like the one in this case, or a diverticulum with stones should be managed by removing the diverticulum and restoring the urethra (12). Continuity can be established through either an anastomosis or a urethroplasty procedure. In a study by Alphs et al., 13 symptomatic urethral diverticula were treated surgically from 2003 to 2008. Diverticulum removal with a primary anastomosis was done for urethral defects measuring less than 4 cm. In comparison, for urethral defects measuring 4 cm or more, substitution urethroplasty was done, both with the same outcome (13). Furthermore, another study proposed a different approach for three children undergoing hypospadias repair, which involved excising the diverticulum and closing the urethra by incorporating overlapping suture lines (14). Additionally, Ronzoni et al. proposed another approach: the Monseur technique. In this adjusted method, the procedure included separating the urethra from the corpora cavernosa, spanning at least 10 cm, and creating a full-thickness incision in an “italic S” shape on the ventral side of the urethra. The urethra was subsequently rotated by 180 degrees along its length, and its edge was sutured to the tunica albuginea of the corpora. Out of 48 patients, none of them had a reoccurrence of the diverticulum (15). Allen et al. also conducted a study on 21 patients, with 7 having congenital defects and 14 having acquired ones. A surgical intervention was performed on 19 out of 21 patients (90%). The surgical approach included primary excision and repair. During an average follow-up period of 60 months, they documented postoperative complications in 64% of patients with acquired-type diverticulum and 27% of patients with congenital-type diverticulum (16). According to Quoraishi et al., an endoscopic approach was used to incise the lip of the diverticulum. However, since the diverticulum pouch still exists, it may develop a flap again, which may require repeat procedures. This can result in scar tissue formation and a urethral stricture (17). Generally, the outcome was good among all cases using diverticulectomy and urethroplasty, as in the current case, with a follow-up period between three months and two years (3, 12). Comparatively, primary anastomosis is preferred for smaller defects due to its lower invasiveness and faster recovery, while substitution urethroplasty is reserved for larger defects where more extensive reconstruction is needed. The Monseur technique and endoscopic approaches, though effective in specific cases, highlight the diversity of surgical options tailored to the complexity of the diverticulum, reinforcing the need for individualized treatment plans.
In the current case, a diverticulectomy was performed, which involved removing the diverticulum. The surgical wound was then closed carefully in layers, and a dartos flap was utilized in the closure process.
Conclusion
Large anterior diverticulum in early infancy is rare but possible; operation is the preferred intervention method.
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Ethics statement
In our locality, ethical approval is not required for case studies involving fewer than three cases. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation in this study was provided by the participants' legal guardians/next of kin. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s), and minor(s)' legal guardian/next of kin, for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.
Author contributions
MH: Conceptualization, Methodology, Resources, Validation, Writing – review & editing. RB: Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Writing – review & editing. IA: Conceptualization, Data curation, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. NH: Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. MR: Conceptualization, Data curation, Methodology, Resources, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. WS: Data curation, Methodology, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. BM: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. HK: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Writing – review & editing. AM: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Resources, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. FK: Conceptualization, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Alyami A, AlShammari A, Burki T. A large congenital anterior urethral diverticulum in a 14-month-old boy. Cureus. (2021) 13(9):e18104. doi: 10.7759/cureus.18104
2. Babty M, Slaoui A, Karmouni T, Khadder KE, Koutani A, Attya AI. Congenital anterior urethral diverticulum in a young man: a case report and review of the literature. Urol Case Rep. (2022) 45:102271. doi: 10.1016/j.eucr.2022.102271
3. Okur MH, Aydogdu B, Arslan S, Basuguy E. A congenital anterior urethral diverticulum associated with obstructive urinary symptoms in a 1-year-old male child: a case report and review of the literature. Pediatr Urol Case Rep. (2015) 2(3):25–30. doi: 10.14534/PUCR.2015310306
4. Cheong WY, Cheng HK, Tan KP. Congenital anterior urethral diverticulum. Singap Med J. (1988) 29(2):171–5.
5. Shuzhu C, Min W, Weijing Y, Yidong L. Congenital urethral diverticulum with infertility in an adult man and review of the literature. SpringerPlus. (2016) 5(1):1–5. doi: 10.1186/s40064-015-1659-2
6. Ada MO, Moustapha H, Habou O, Sidi IH, Mansour SI, Abarchi H. Congenital anterior urethral diverticulum of the distal penis: a case report. Pediatr Urol Case Rep. (2021) 8(4):95–9. doi: 10.14534/j-pucr.2021267558
7. Peev S, Pelov T, Dorosiev E, Mladenov B, Stoeva B, Stoykov B. A rare case of congenital anterior urethral diverticulum in a two-year-old boy. Urol Case Rep. (2021) 39:101768. doi: 10.1016/j.eucr.2021.101768
8. Kadian YS, Rattan KN, Singh M, Kajal P. Congenital anterior urethral diverticulum in children: a case report and review. Int Sch Res Notices. (2011) 2011:120307. doi: 10.5402/2011/120307
9. Eshiba A, Ashour K, Zein M. Congenital anterior urethral diverticulum. J Pediatr Surg Case Rep. (2018) 36:33–5. doi: 10.1016/j.epsc.2018.06.015
10. Kakamad FH, Abdalla BA, Abdullah HO, Omar SS, Mohammed SH, Ahmed SM, et al. Lists of predatory journals and publishers: a review for future refinement. Eur Sci Ed. (2024) 50:e118119. doi: 10.3897/ese.2024.e118119
11. Gupta DK, Srinivas M. Congenital anterior urethral diverticulum in children. Pediatr Surg Int. (2000) 16:565–8. doi: 10.1007/s003830000430
12. Chibani I, Nouira F, Marzouki M, Ahmed YB, Boukesra T, Charieg A, et al. Congenital anterior urethral diverticulum presenting as a scrotal mass. J Pediatr Surg Case Rep. (2021) 64:101696. doi: 10.1016/j.epsc.2020.101696
13. Alphs HH, Meeks JJ, Casey JT, Gonzalez CM. Surgical reconstruction of the male urethral diverticulum. Urology. (2010) 76(2):471–5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.11.080
14. Zaontz MR, Kaplan WE, Maizels M. Surgical correction of anterior urethral diverticula after hypospadias repair in children. Urology. (1989) 33(1):40–2. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(89)90064-2
15. Ronzoni G, De Giovanni L, Manca A, Pasqui F, Mastrangelo P, Menchinelli P. Urethroplasty in recurrent urethral diverticula in neurological patients: long-term results using a personal technique. BJU Int. (2004) 94(1):185–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.04917.x
16. Allen D, Mishra V, Pepper W, Shah S, Motiwala H. A single-center experience of symptomatic male urethral diverticula. Urology. (2007) 70(4):650–3. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.06.1111
Keywords: congenital anterior urethral diverticulum, urethrocystoscopy, urinary tract infection, anterior urethral valve, management
Citation: Hassan MA, Bapir R, Aghaways I, Hama NH, Raheem MF, Sabr WN, Mohammed BA, Kareem HO, Mustafa AM and Kakamad FH (2024) Large anterior congenital urethral diverticulum in an infant: a case report. Front. Surg. 11:1374168. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1374168
Received: 21 January 2024; Accepted: 12 August 2024;
Published: 26 August 2024.
Edited by:
Ruben Blachman-Braun, University of Miami Health System, United StatesReviewed by:
Andres Gomez Fraile, University Hospital October 12, SpainWalid Farhat, University of Wisconsin-Madison, United States
Khashayar Atqiaee, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Iran
Copyright: © 2024 Hassan, Bapir, Aghaways, Hama, Raheem, Sabr, Mohammed, Kareem, Mustafa and Kakamad. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Fahmi H. Kakamad, ZmFobWkuaHVzc2VpbkB1bml2c3VsLmVkdS5pcQ==