Skip to main content

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Surg.
Sec. Genitourinary Surgery
Volume 11 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1372175

Mirabegron 50 mg once daily, long-term treatment maximizes benefit in middle-aged and older people with overactive bladder syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of nine phase II/III, randomized, double-blind, parallel-design, placebo-controlled, multicentre, and multinational trials

Provisionally accepted
Xiangxiang Zhang Xiangxiang Zhang 1*Yinhui Mao Yinhui Mao 1*Yang Liu Yang Liu 1Jilei Sun Jilei Sun 2*Juntao Sun Juntao Sun 1*Chenli Pan Chenli Pan 1Zhuo Wang Zhuo Wang 1*Zhitao Wei Zhitao Wei 2*Yong Yang Yong Yang 2*
  • 1 Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun, Jilin Province, China
  • 2 The Affiliated Hospital of Changchun University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changchun, Jilin Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    The prevalence and severity of overactive bladder increases with age. Mirabegron is approved to treat the disease. This meta-analysis systematically evaluated the efficacy and safety of mirabegron compared with placebo for the treatment of overactive bladder. We searched Pubmed and the Cochrane Library (searched 30 October 2023) for relevant articles (source: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CT.gov, ICTRP, CINAHL). Randomized controlled trials in adults with overactive bladder syndrome that compared mirabegron with placebo treatment. Data were processed as described in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (Review Manager [Computer program] Version 5.4). Nine trials with parallel-group designs were included (10 articles). The evaluation included a total of 8527 adults, including 6445 women and 2082 men, of whom 5726 were White, 2462 were Asian, and 161 were Black. The mean age of the participants ranged from 53.4 to 60.3 years. This evaluation involved three specifications of mirabegron: 25mg, 50mg, and 100mg. In all trials, patients were enrolled in a 12-week double-blind treatment period, and the dose was once daily.The review of trials found that on average, people taking mirabegron had about thirteen ml more volume voided per micturition, five fewer micturitions, and four fewer incontinence episodes every week, with moderate improvements in quality of life. About one in five people taking the drug reported TRAEs. Mirabegron treatment is well tolerated, and the risk of adverse events is similar to placebo. For best results, it is best to stick to 50 mg once daily for a long period of time. It is not clear whether any benefits are sustained after treatment stops.

    Keywords: Meta-analysis, Mirabegron, placebo, randomized controlled trials, Urinary Bladder, Overactive, Middle-aged and older people

    Received: 17 Jan 2024; Accepted: 29 Jul 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Zhang, Mao, Liu, Sun, Sun, Pan, Wang, Wei and Yang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Xiangxiang Zhang, Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun, 130117, Jilin Province, China
    Yinhui Mao, Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun, 130117, Jilin Province, China
    Jilei Sun, The Affiliated Hospital of Changchun University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changchun, 130021, Jilin Province, China
    Juntao Sun, Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun, 130117, Jilin Province, China
    Zhuo Wang, Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun, 130117, Jilin Province, China
    Zhitao Wei, The Affiliated Hospital of Changchun University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changchun, 130021, Jilin Province, China
    Yong Yang, The Affiliated Hospital of Changchun University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changchun, 130021, Jilin Province, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.