Gaetano Luglio
Francesca Paola Tropeano
Gianluca Pagano
Michele Cricrì- Endoscopic Surgery Unit, Integrated Department of Gastrointestinal Disease, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
Editorial on the Research Topic
Abdominal and Perianal Fistulizing Crohn’s Disease: Imaging, Surgical Techniques and Basic Research
Crohn’s disease (CD) is an idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease characterized by chronic transmural inflammation typically affecting the distal ileum and the proximal colon.
In penetrating CD (PCD), the formation of fistulas derives from the transmural migration of bacteria from the gut lumen to contiguous tissues, giving rise to a variety of clinical conditions, ranging from an abdominal inflammatory mass to enteric fistulas up to perianal fistulas (1–3).
The prevalence of PCD reaches 16% in the adult CD population, and there is a strong association between abdominal and perianal fistulizing disease, especially in Crohn’s colitis (4, 5).
For its complex and multiform nature, PCD represents a challenge among the multidisciplinary team, posing several dilemmas regarding timing and role of medical, radiological, and surgical approaches.
When technically feasible, preoperative optimization of intra-abdominal abscesses should be considered; indeed, operating on a CD complicated by an abscess or a phlegmon without adequate down-staging is difficult and likely to require laparotomy, resection of healthy bowel or organs adherent to the inflammatory mass, and the creation of an ostomy due to the higher risk of anastomotic dehiscence (6–9).
Preoperative optimization aims to reduce the abdominal sepsis and bridge the patient to the surgical intervention in better clinical conditions: antibiotic treatment, oral diet restriction and nutritional support are the cornerstones of medical improvement in the preoperative management of abdominal abscesses smaller than 3 cm (10).
For abscesses larger than 3 cm, percutaneous drainage (PTD) should be considered. Compared to surgical drainage, PTD demonstrated lower complication rates and shorter hospital stay, allowing to perform an elective surgical intervention with lower stoma and morbidity rate.
Although the conservative approach is always more feasible for treating abdominal PCD, it is not clear whether this may be enough or serve as bridge to the definitive surgical intervention.
Indeed, PTD could either resolve the intra-abdominal abscess or convert it into an enterocutaneous fistula, which can be addressed surgically without the need of stoma formation.
However, even after adequate non-surgical optimization, most patients will require surgery to treat their underlying PCD. A waiting period of 6–8 weeks after allows a more profound stabilization of patient’s weight loss, anemia, and hypoalbuminemia. Laparoscopic approach should be preferred, even in more complex cases; moreover, preoperative PTD itself makes laparoscopic surgery more feasible (6). With respect to its application in uncomplicated disease, laparoscopic approach for PCD presents similar outcomes in terms of morbidity and hospital stay; nevertheless, it is associated with longer operative times and higher risk of conversion and diverting stoma.
There are several clinical scenarios in which surgery may be performed for PCD.
In presence of an inflammatory mass, if disease and healthy loops are distinguishable, adequate separation and resection can be accomplished; on the contrary, if it is not possible to separate diseased and non-disease intestinal segments, then the best option may be a diverting stoma, switching off the acute inflammation and allowing a less radical surgery later in time.
In case of intra-abdominal abscess, surgery is indicated if sepsis cannot be controlled non-surgically or after adequate pre-operative optimization, which may permit resection and anastomosis rather than stoma formation, which is instead the rule in the former scenario.
Perianal Fistulizing Crohn’s Disease (PFCD) is a highly disabling disease phenotype, whose occurrence varies between 14% and 23% in patients affected by CD, which encompasses a wide variety of entities, including both fistulising lesions (abscesses, perianal or rectovaginal fistulas) and non-fistulising ones (fissures, deep ulcers, anorectal strictures, skin tags, or haemorrhoids). Moreover, the clinical impact of these entities can also vary significantly from asymptomatic and mild diseases to severe scenarios (11, 12).
Perianal fistulas are usually classified by their relationship to the anal sphincter complex letting the surgeon to opt for the best surgical approach (13). An immediate drainage is the treatment of choice when a perianal abscess is present. Simple asymptomatic fistulas usually do not require further treatment once perianal sepsis is under control (14). In cases of symptomatic fistulas or complex disease, a “cone-like” fistulectomy with a draining seton is usually advised. Hand in hand with surgery, the introduction of biologics has remarkably empowered the management of perianal CD, making a combined surgical and medical approach the standard of care (6, 15, 16). Seton placement enhance fibrosis, preventing premature skin closure and ensuring controlled long-term fistula drainage while maintaining the external anal sphincter's integrity. Patients’ biologic therapy might be administered with a lower risk of septic complications, enhancing the effectiveness of medical therapy. However, there is still some debate concerning the quality of life of patients with a seton placed.
As a matter of fact, perianal fistulas healing is still an unmet need in IBD care, being healing rates about 52% despite all the efforts of combined multidisciplinary treatments. Additional surgical techniques, such as advancement flaps or the LIFT operation, do not always guarantee healing, leaving a considerable number of patients with a draining fistula.
Novel therapeutic tools are arising. Among them, the role of local injection of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) is emerging as promising.
Whether autologous or allogeneic MSCs constitute the best cellular product remains unanswered from the clinical trials published to date. Some authors advocate the use of autologous MSCs because of safety concerns. However, there is substantial evidence that not all autologous MSCs are equivalent in terms of proliferative and functional properties. Additionally, it was shown that MSCs harvested from adipose tissue in patients with CD exhibit reduced immunosuppressive capabilities when compared with MSCs from healthy donors. The challenges of autologous MSCs include not only the difficulties and possible complications of harvesting, but also harvesting variability and potential waste of resources.
In this research topic, several aspects of PCD have been explored.
Myrelid et al. provided readers with an overview of penetrating abdominal CD and how this scenario should be managed, while Reylonds et al. discuss about surgical strategies to prevent CD recurrences.
Luceri et al. aimed to correlate the occurrence of intestinal fistulization to the plasma levels of MMP9, and of miR-126.
As for PFCD, Colombo et al. shared their experience with MSCs while quality of life issues related with seton placement are investigated by Angriman et al.
Author Contributions
All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Yamaguchi A, Matsui T, Sakurai T, Ueki T, Nakabayashi S, Yao T, et al. The clinical characteristics and outcome of intraabdominal abscess in Crohn’s disease. J Gastroenterol. (2004) 39:441–8. doi: 10.1007/S00535-003-1317-2
2. Agwunobi AO, Carlson GL, Anderson ID, Irving MH, Scott NA. Mechanisms of intestinal failure in Crohn’s disease. Dis Colon Rectum. (2001) 44:1834–7. doi: 10.1007/BF02234463
3. Soop M, Khan H, Nixon E, Teubner A, Abraham A, Carlson G, et al. Causes and prognosis of intestinal failure in Crohn’s disease: an 18-year experience from a national centre. J Crohns Colitis. (2020) 14:1558–64. doi: 10.1093/ECCO-JCC/JJAA060
4. Tang LY, Rawsthorne P, Bernstein CN. Are perineal and luminal fistulas associated in Crohn’s disease? A population-based study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. (2006) 4:1130–4. doi: 10.1016/J.CGH.2006.06.021
5. Sachar DB, Bodian CA, Goldstein ES, Present DH, Bayless TM, Picco M, et al. Is perianal Crohn’s disease associated with intestinal fistulization? Am J Gastroenterol. (2005) 100:1547–9. doi: 10.1111/J.1572-0241.2005.40980.X
6. Bemelman WA, Warusavitarne J, Sampietro GM, Serclova Z, Zmora O, Luglio G, et al. ECCO-ESCP consensus on surgery for Crohn’s disease. J Crohn’s Colitis. (2018) 12(1):1–16. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjx061
7. Goyer P, Alves A, Bretagnol F, Bouhnik Y, Valleur P, Panis Y. Impact of complex Crohn’s disease on the outcome of laparoscopic ileocecal resection: a comparative clinical study in 124 patients. Dis Colon Rectum. (2009) 52:205–10. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0B013E31819C9C08
8. Yamamoto T, Allan RN, Keighley MRB. Risk factors for intra-abdominal sepsis after surgery in Crohn’s disease. Dis Colon Rectum. (2000) 43:1141–5. doi: 10.1007/BF02236563
9. Tzivanakis A, Singh JC, Guy RJ, Travis SPL, Mortensen NJ, George BD. Influence of risk factors on the safety of ileocolic anastomosis in Crohn’s disease surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. (2012) 55:558–62. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0B013E318247C433
10. De Groof EJ, Carbonnel F, Buskens CJ, Bemelman WA. Abdominal abscess in Crohn’s disease: multidisciplinary management. Dig Dis. (2014) 32(Suppl 1):103–9. doi: 10.1159/000367859
11. Schwartz DA, Loftus EV Jr, Tremaine WJ, Panaccione R, Harmsen WS, Zinsmeister AR, et al. The natural history of fistulizing Crohn’s disease in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Gastroenterology. (2002) 122:875–80. doi: 10.1053/gast.2002.32362
12. Lapidus A. Crohn’s disease in Stockholm County during 1990-2001: an epidemiological update. World J Gastroenterol. (2006) 12:75–81. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i1.75
13. Parks AG, Gordon PH, Hardcastle JD. A classification of fistula-in-ano. Br J Surg. (1976) 63:1–12. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800630102
14. Orlando A, Armuzzi A, Papi C, Annese V, Ardizzone S, Biancone L, et al. The Italian Society of Gastroenterology (SIGE) and the Italian Group for the study of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IG-IBD) Clinical Practice Guidelines: the use of tumor necrosis factor-alpha antagonist therapy in inflammatory bowel disease. Dig Liver Dis. (2011) 43:1–20. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2010.07.010
15. Present DH, Rutgeerts P, Targan S, Hanauer SB, Mayer L, van Hogezand RA, et al. Infliximab for the treatment of fistulas in patients with Crohn’s disease. N Engl J Med. (1999) 340:1398–405. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199905063401804
Keywords: IBD – inflammatory bowel disease, fistulizing crohn’s disease, perianal crohn disease, surgery, stem cell, abscess
Citation: Luglio G, Tropeano FP, Pagano G and Cricrì M (2022) Editorial: Abdominal and Perianal Fistulizing Crohn's Disease: Imaging, Surgical Techniques and Basic Research. Front. Surg. 9:952874. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.952874
Received: 25 May 2022; Accepted: 26 May 2022;
Published: 28 June 2022.
Edited by:
Ferdinand Köckerling, Vivantes Hospital, Germany*Correspondence: Gaetano Luglio gaetano.luglio@gmail.com
†ORCID: Gaetano Luglio orcid.org/0000-0002-5931-9599 Francesca Paola Tropeano orcid.org/0000-0001-7171-1940 Gianluca Pagano orcid.org/0000-0003-0416-5358 Michele Cricrì orcid.org/0000-0003-2359-1504
Specialty section: This article was submitted to Visceral Surgery, a section of the journal Frontiers in Surgery
Copyright © 2022 Luglio, Tropeano, Pagano and Cricrì. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.