Skip to main content

CASE REPORT article

Front. Surg., 06 January 2023
Sec. Visceral Surgery

An ingested metallic wire migrating from stomach to pancreas treated by laparoscopic surgery: A case report

\r\nFulong Hao,,&#x;Fulong Hao1,2,†Qingbo Feng,&#x;Qingbo Feng1,†Jiaxin Li,,&#x;Jiaxin Li1,3,†Hong Wu
\r\nHong Wu1*
  • 1Department of Liver Surgery and Liver Transplantation Centre, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
  • 2Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Suining First People's Hospital, Suining, China
  • 3Dafang County People's Hospital, Bijie, China

Introduction: Foreign bodies inside the pancreas are rare and usually occur after the ingestion of sharp objects such as a fish bone, a sewing needle, or a toothpick. Furthermore, an ingested metallic wire migrating from stomach to pancreas is very rare.

Case Presentation: We report a 36-year-old woman who was admitted to our hospital with “3-day history of dull progressive epigastric pain.” Computed tomography of the abdomen revealed a linear, high-density body between the stomach wall and the pancreas. During the operation, a linear, hard, metallic wire was found in the adhesive tissue between the gastric antrum and the pancreatic body. The operation was uneventful, and the patient recovered well.

Conclusion: The case of a foreign body inside the pancreas caused by a metallic wire is very rare. Radiological examinations play a vital role in the diagnosis of metallic wire ingestion. Metallic wire ingestion can be treated with laparoscopic surgery, both technically and safely.

Introduction

Majority of foreign bodies that are accidentally ingested pass through the alimentary tract spontaneously within 1 week without complications (1). There is an estimated 1% chance that foreign bodies will penetrate the stomach or small intestine and migrate to other nearby organs, such as the liver and pancreas (2). Once the sharp foreign bodies are inside the pancreas, they will lead to pancreatic abscess, pancreatitis, or pseudoaneurysm, and are misdiagnosed as pancreatic tumors (36). Perforation of the metallic wire through the stomach into the pancreas that did not cause fever or pancreatitis is extremely uncommon. We hereby report a rare case of a metallic wire that penetrated through the posterior wall of the gastric antrum, became embedded in the pancreas and was successfully removed laparoscopically.

Case presentation

Our study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the CASE REPORT (CARE) guidelines (7). A 36-year-old woman presented to our emergency department with epigastric pain for 3 days. Physical examination showed no abdominal tenderness. She had a temperature of 37.1°C, a blood pressure of 113/76 mmHg, a respiratory rate of 18 breaths/min, and a pulse rate of 77 beats/min. No other notable abnormality was found on systemic examination. Initial laboratory investigations were unremarkable except for a markedly elevated white blood cell count of 10.92 × 109/L, with 76.5% neutrophils and slightly elevated levels of C-reactive protein. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) revealed a linear, hyperdense, foreign body that perforated the stomach's posterior wall and was embedded in the pancreas (Figure 1). Abscess formation, free air, and pancreatitis were not observed. Gastroscopy revealed no abnormalities and no obvious perforation. Previous history showed that she was fit and well with no significant medical history. On further questioning, the patient recalled that her family often uses a metallic wire brush to wash pots and pans. This metallic wire may have entered the food in this way, and then she ate it. Diagnostic laparoscopy was performed under general anesthesia. During the operation, the gastrocolic ligament was opened with the help of a laparoscopic instrument. A foreign metallic wire spanning from the posterior of a lesser curvature of the stomach to the head and body of pancreas was visualized (Figure 2). The metallic wire was (3 cm) removed from the abdomen (Figure 3). The defect in the stomach wall was repaired laparoscopically using 4/0 sutures. Symptomatic treatment, including anti-infection, pain relief, and fluid replacement, was routinely applied after surgery. The patient recovered well and was discharged on the 10th day. At 2-months follow-up, the patient had no complications and was doing well.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Computed tomography scan showed a hyperdense linear foreign body which penetrated through the posterior wall of the gastric antrum and embedded in the pancreas.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Operative findings. (A) A linear, hard, metallic wire was found in the adhesive tissue between the gastric antrum and the pancreatic body. (B) Removal of metallic wire.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. A metallic wire of length 3 cm was extracted from the stomach and pancreas.

Discussion

Foreign body ingestion is a common problem. Most ingested foreign bodies pass spontaneously through the digestive tract, and only 1% of them can perforate or penetrate the gastrointestinal tract and migrate into organs such as the liver and pancreas. When dealing with this condition, it is important for a medical professional to consider the size, sharpness, and shape of the foreign body. When an object is larger than 5 cm or has a pointed shape, the risk of injury increases (8). Up until now, most patients with foreign bodies embedded in the pancreas had a fish bone or a needle (9). To the best of our knowledge, there are only a few cases of an ingested metallic wire that penetrated through the gastrointestinal tract and migrated into the pancreas. Foreign bodies reaching the pancreas can cause abscess, pseudoaneurysm, pancreatitis, and high-mortality-risk complications (36). It is important to diagnose gastrointestinal foreign bodies promptly and intervene early to prevent morbidity and mortality (10, 11).

It is often difficult to diagnose these patients since they cannot remember swallowing foreign bodies accidentally. Symptoms can mimic those of epigastric pain or gastritis as well. Abdominal CT examinations can be beneficial in diagnosing and localizing foreign bodies. CT/MRI abdomen detection of foreign bodies is the most common method reported in the literature. Accurate preoperative diagnoses of wire ingestion based on CT is beneficial to the operation of laparoscopic resection. Fortunately, the metallic wire was successfully removed by laparoscopic management in our case. There has been a case where a metal BBQ brush wire was ingested and lodged in the pancreas; in that case, the wire was successfully retrieved with a gastroscopy (12). Based on our experience with the current case, some suggestions should be taken into consideration. Laparoscopic foreign body removal is preferable to open surgical removal when an abdominal foreign body has been diagnosed, especially in patients with a stable, non-acute condition. Laparoscopic surgery has advantages in reducing postoperative pain and wound infection, as well as minimizing surgical stress and taking out the iron wire under the gastroscope. In the present case, there have been a growing number of similar cases treated with laparoscopic surgery over the past few years (4, 11, 13). An ingested metallic wire was successfully removed laparoscopically, and the patient recovered without complications.

In conclusion, we presented a rare case of metallic wire migrating from the stomach to the pancreas. Our case demonstrated that laparoscopy is technically feasible and safe for the treatment of patients with metallic wire ingestion. Imaging examination is helpful for preoperative diagnosis, especially abdominal CT, which is an important tool for both localization and surgical decision making. Most cases can be diagnosed by CT, and patients with foreign body perforation should be treated surgically. Compared with open surgery, laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery provides better diagnosis, less postoperative pain, less wound infection, and a faster recovery.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.

Author contributions

FH and QF contributed to study concept and design. QF and FH contributed to investigation and writing the original draft. QF, FH, and JL contributed to data collection. HW and JL revised the paper. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This work was funded by Sichuan University from 0 to 1 project (2022SCUH0017); Sichuan Science and Technology Plan Project “International cooperation in science and technology innovation/technological innovation cooperation in Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan” (2021YFH0095).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Kanazawa S, Ishigaki K, Miyake T, Ishida A, Tabuchi A, Tanemoto K, et al. A granulomatous liver abscess which developed after a toothpick penetrated the gastrointestinal tract: report of a case. Surg Today. (2003) 33(4):312–14. doi: 10.1007/s005950300071

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Mulita F, Papadopoulos G, Tsochatzis S, Kehagias I. Laparoscopic removal of an ingested fish bone from the head of the pancreas: case report and review of literature. Pan Afr Med J. (2020) 36:123. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2020.36.123.23948

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Williams HE, Khokhar AA, Rizvi M, Gould S. Gastric perforation by a foreign body presenting as a pancreatic pseudotumour. Int J Surg Case Rep. (2014) 5(7):437–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2014.04.021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Jain A, Nag HH, Goel N, Gupta N, Agarwal AK. Laparoscopic removal of a needle from the pancreas. J Minim Access Surg. (2013) 9(2):80–1. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.110968

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Huang YH, Siao FY, Yen HH. Pre-operative diagnosis of pancreatic abscess from a penetrating fish bone. QJM. (2013) 106(10):955–6. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcs166

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Goh BK, Jeyaraj PR, Chan HS, Ong HS, Agasthian T, Chang KT, et al. A case of fish bone perforation of the stomach mimicking a locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma. Dig Dis Sci. (2004) 49(11–12):1935–7. doi: 10.1007/s10620-004-9595-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Riley DS, Barber MS, Kienle GS, Aronson JK, von Schoen-Angerer T, Tugwell P, et al. CARE Guidelines for case reports: explanation and elaboration document. J Clin Epidemiol. (2017) 89:218–35. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.04.026

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Jaan A, Mulita F. Gastrointestinal foreign body. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing (2022). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32965874/

9. Dal F, Hatipoğlu E, Teksöz S, Ertem M. Foreign body: a sewing needle migrating from the gastrointestinal tract to pancreas. Turk J Surg. (2018) 34(3):256–8. doi: 10.5152/turkjsurg.2017.3391

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Lee KF, Chu W, Wong SW, Lai PB. Hepatic abscess secondary to foreign body perforation of the stomach. Asian J Surg. (2005) 28(4):297–300. doi: 10.1016/S1015-9584(09)60365-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Mima K, Sugihara H, Kato R, Matsumoto C, Nomoto D, Shigaki H, et al. Laparoscopic removal of an ingested fish bone that penetrated the stomach and was embedded in the pancreas: a case report. Surg Case Rep. (2018) 4(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s40792-018-0559-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Gaszynski R, Zhu KJ. Summer danger: penetrating pancreatic injury from barbecue wire bristle. ANZ J Surg. (2018) 88(12):1354–5. doi: 10.1111/ans.13924

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Wang Y, Luo X, Zhang J. Successful laparoscopic treatment for sustained abdominal pain due to fish bone migrating into the neck of the pancreas: a case report and thinking about surgical approach through the literature review. Surg Case Rep. (2021) 7(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s40792-021-01174-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: metallic wire, gastric perforation, pancreas, laparoscopic surgery, case report

Citation: Hao F, Feng Q, Li J and Wu H (2023) An ingested metallic wire migrating from stomach to pancreas treated by laparoscopic surgery: A case report. Front. Surg. 9:927637. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.927637

Received: 24 April 2022; Accepted: 8 November 2022;
Published: 6 January 2023.

Edited by:

Gabriel Sandblom, Karolinska Institutet (KI), Sweden

Reviewed by:

Francesk Mulita, General University Hospital of Patras, Greece
Dileep Lobo, University of Nottingham, United Kingdom
Rafael Gaszynski, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Australia

© 2023 Hao, Feng, Li and Wu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Hong Wu wuhong7801@163.com

These authors contributed equally to this work

Specialty Section: This article was submitted to Visceral Surgery, a section of the journal Frontiers in Surgery

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.