AUTHOR=Wang Hailong , Wang Miao , Xin Ning , Wei Rongqiang , Huang Kenan 

TITLE=Effect Evaluation of Subxiphoid and Intercostal Thymectomy: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Surgery

VOLUME=9

YEAR=2022

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/surgery/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2022.925003

DOI=10.3389/fsurg.2022.925003

ISSN=2296-875X

ABSTRACT=<sec><title>Background</title><p>It still remains unclear whether subxiphoid video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (SVATS) thymectomy is safe and reasonable. This meta-analysis aims at assessing the effectiveness and safety of SVATS for thymoma in comparison with that of intercostal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (IVATS) thymectomy.</p></sec><sec><title>Methods</title><p>All the relevant data systematically analyzed in this thesis were retrieved from PubMed, the Cochrane Library, web of science, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov. The time span for data retrieval was from the date of database establishment to March 2022. The outcome indicators include operation time, intraoperative blood loss, duration of postoperative drainage, postoperative hospital days, visual analogue scale (VAS) score on the day of operation, VAS score on postoperative day 3, and VAS score on postoperative day 7; postoperative complications were analyzed in our meta-analysis.</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>In 13 studies of this paper, there were 1,198 cases included. Among them, 563 cases were treated by SVATS thymectomy and 635 cases by IVATS thymectomy. There was no significant difference in the operation time [113.38 vs. 119.91  min, 95% confidence interval (CI): −0.70–0.15, <italic>p</italic> = 0.20) and the incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications (RR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.58–1.15, <italic>p</italic> = 0.25) between SVATS thymectomy and IVATS thymectomy. However, SVATS thymectomy significantly reduced the amount of intraoperative blood loss (47.68 vs. 66.69  mL, SMD = −0.57, 95% CI: −0.95 to −0.18, <italic>p</italic> = 0.004), postoperative drainage days (2.12 vs. 2.72 days, SMD = −0.46, 95% CI: −0.74 to −0.18, <italic>p</italic> = 0.001), postoperative hospital stays (4.53 vs. 5.91 days, SMD = −0.64, 95% CI: −0.96 to −0.31, <italic>p</italic> = 0.0001), and VAS scores after the operation.</p></sec><sec><title>Discussion</title><p>SVATS thymectomy is safe and feasible, and the perioperative effect is better than IVATS thymectomy to a certain extent, which is worthy of popularization and further research.</p><p><bold>Systematic Review Registration:</bold><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/</ext-link></p></sec>