Skip to main content

CASE REPORT article

Front. Surg., 28 October 2022
Sec. Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery

Lymphepithelial carcinoma - a rare tumor of the larynx. Case Report

  • Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland

Lymphoepithelioma was described in 1921 separately by Regaud and Schmincke as nests of non-keratinizing squamous cells embedded in a lymphoid stroma (Regaud) and isolated transitional cells scattered in lymphoid tissue resembling sarcoma (Schmincke). Lymphoepithelial tumors are the most common lesions of the nasopharynx, although they have also been reported in other localizations, such as the nasal cavity, maxillary sinus, the base of the tongue, parapharyngeal area, tonsils and thymus. Lymphoepithelioma of the larynx is extremely rare. We present a case of a 55-year-old patient treated due to this type of lesion to share our experience in the management of this type of malignancy and contribute to the field of rare laryngeal tumors diagnosis and treatment.

Introduction

Lymphoepithelial carcinoma (LEC) is the most common lesions of the nasopharynx, although they have also been reported in other localizations, such as the nasal cavity, maxillary sinus, the base of the tongue, parapharyngeal area, tonsils and thymus (1). Lymphoepithelioma of the larynx is extremely rare with a 0.2% occurrence rate (1).

Compilation of LEC cases was performed by Faisal et al. with the distribution of the clinical and anatomic pathology variables in 46 patients with this type of tumor in the larynx and hypopharynx (2). Three more cases was described since this publication (Table 1).

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. New cases described after publication of Faisal et al. (2).

We present a case of a 55-year-old patient with Schmincke's tumor of the larynx.

Case report

A 55-year-old caucasian male patient was admitted to the laryngology ward due to the suspicion of a tumor involving the larynx. The patient had hoarseness lasting for 2 months prior to the admision, without other symptoms. He was a heavy smoker (>20 cigarettes almost over 30 years), suffering from hypertension and psoriasis. The laryngological examination revealed the smooth tumor of the left side of the larynx involving the left vocal fold, left vestibular fold and the petiole of the epiglottis. The surgical procedures were scheduled- the patient underwent two microlaryngoscopies with the sampling of the tumor tissue resulting with the diagnosis of malignant lesion, then the patient was referred to transoral laser-microsurgical resection (Table 2). Final histopathological examination revealed nonkeratinizing undifferentiated carcinoma, Schmincke pattern (Figures 1, 2).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Undifferentiated carcinoma- sheet of tumor cells with few intermixed lymphocytes (H + E stain).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Histopathological examination showing positivity for cytokeratin.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Procedures and histopathological examination results.

The computed tomography (CT) scans made before surgical resection with the use of CO2-laser showed the presence of a tumor measuring 19 × 12 mm and height 21 mm, within the pedicle of the epiglottis on the left side and the anterior 2/3 of the left vestibular fold, invading the anterior commissure and reaching the vocal fold without any obvious features of vocal fold infiltration. In addition, the correct CT image of the entrance to the larynx, epiglottis, subglottic area of the larynx and the part of the trachea included in the examination (Figure 3, 4).

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Pathological mass located in the left vestibular fold (lesion marked with an →).

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. The entrance to the larynx, epiglottis, subglottic area of the larynx and the part of the trachea included in the examination (lesion marked with *).

After the surgical resection the Oncological Board referred the patient for adjuvant radiotherapy. He received a full cycle of radiotherapy as planned- 60 Gy. The patient stays under the care of an outpatient clinic. No signs of tumor recurrence were observed in over 18 months of observation. The patient has a socially efficient voice, but he's dealing with the side-effects after radiotherapy (oral mucositis, skin irritation on the neck) on a manageable level.

Discussion

Lymphoepithelioma was described in 1921 separately by Regaud and Schmincke as nests of non-keratinizing squamous cells embedded in a lymphoid stroma (Regaud) and isolated transitional cells scattered in lymphoid tissue resembling sarcoma (Schmincke) (6, 7).

The non-differentiated tumor (called Schmincke's tumor) is more prevalent in the African and Chinese populations (2, 6). There are two peaks of incidence of the tumor according to age: between 20 and 30 years, and after 60 years of age (1, 6). According to the research of Faisal et. all. the mean age of presentation is 64 years (range 40–82 years) with predominant presentation in males. The most commonly involved subsites are the supraglottis and hypopharynx. Smoking and alcohol are major contributing factors in the LEC development (2).

The tumor is rarely located outside of the nasopharynx. In 75% of cases lymph node invasion at the time of diagnosis is present and metastatic disease is described in almost 30% of the cases. The most common sites of metastasis are bones, lungs, and liver (8, 9). No signs of cervical lymphadenopathy or metastatic disease were observed in our patient's case. The association with some HLA haplotypes (A2, A33, B46, B58) was noted (9). Dermatomyositis often manifests as a paraneoplastic syndrome (9). However, most common complaints are hoarseness (⅓ of patients), dysphagia (⅕ of patients) and cervical mass (⅕ of patients) (2).

The lymphoepithelioma of the larynx may arise from lymphatic tissue in the laryngeal ventricle. The microscopic studies on the origin and biology of the tumor showed the presence of single or double laryngocele in 70% of cases of laryngeal and parapharyngeal carcinomas in surgical specimens (9, 10). Cylindrical or squamous epithelium with lymphoid tissue resembling the typical histology of lymph nodes and lymphoid tissue of Waldeyer's ring was observed during the laryngoceles evaluation. This lymphoepithelial tissue has been proposed to be a tonsil of the larynx. Lymphoepithelioma may arise from these structures. Active basal epithelium in the larynx, similar to the epithelium found in the tonsillar crypts, is also proposed to be alternatively the place of origin of these lesions. Lymphocytes are believed to be a nonneoplastic component of the tumor since only the epithelial component is found in the metastatic tissue (1, 810).

The lymphomas and lymphoepitheliomas of the larynx are very difficult to distinguish clinically, usually presenting as smooth supraglottic masses involving the epiglottic area or aryepiglottic fold (Table 3). Cytokeratin immunohistochemistry is helpfull in highlighting the irregular infiltrative nature of lymphepithelial carciona. Malignant differential diagnoses that need to be distinguished from these type of tumor includes lymphoma and melanoma. In our patient's case the tumor was a smooth lesion involving the supraglottic region. The lymphoepithelioma of the larynx shares many similarities with those of the nasopharynx: the significant metastatic potential to the mediastinum, lung, and abdomen and high radiosensitivity (1).

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Differential histopathological diagnosis.

Due to the rarity of LEC in the larynx and hypopharynx the current literature provides only recommendations and there are no available treatment guidelines.Treatment options include surgery and radiotherapy (primary and adjuvant) (9). Due to the radiosensitivity of the lesion, radiotherapy should be considered as a first-line-therapy providing good local control (1113). In this case the patient prefered surgical resection followed by the adjuvant treatment. This course of treatment is recommended in advanced cases. Adjuvant chemotherapy may be useful (10, 11). Neoadjuvant or accompanying chemotherapy for lymphoepithelial carcinoma may be recommended in case of early regional adenopathy, which may decrease the risk of metastatic disease development (914). The chemotherapy protocol in advanced cases of LEC suggested by Bugada et. all is EXTREME regimen therapy (cisplatin, cetuximab and fluorouracil) (5). This protocol is recommended as the standard care for recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer not eligible for surgery or chemotherapy with curative intent, according to NCCN guidelines (2022). The standard protocol of therapy consist of: (1) Cetuximab 400 mg/mEq as first administration and then 250 mg/mEq on days 1, 8, 15 and then 21; (2) Cisplatin 100 mg/mEq in single administration, repeated on day 21 or as an alternative may 20 mg/mEq for 5 days and then repeated on 21 day; cisplatin dosage should be modified according to age, general condition of the patient and his renal function; the change for carboplatin is possible; (3) Fluorouracil (5-FU) 200 mg/mEq on days 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 with the repetition after 21 days. Radiotherapy protocols vary according to stage of the tumor, usually with the 70 Gy (2.0 Gy/fraction) per 7 weeks and for the site of suspected subclinical spread: 44–50 Gy (2.0 Gy/fraction) to 54–63 Gy (1.6–1.8 Gy/fraction). This protocol is suggested in NCCN guidelines (2022) in the treatment of advanced head and neck cancer (3, 5).

Our patient received a full cycle of planned adjuvant radiotherapy. Chemotherapy was not scheduled in our patient's case.

Concluding, we have presented a case of a rare laryngeal malignancy treated with success by the surgical excision and adjuvant radiotherapy.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

Ethical review and approval was not required for the study on human participants in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author contributions

PN. MS collected the data, preparation of the manuscript. JJ, MW- revision and corect of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Małgorzata Peplińska for language support during the preparation of this manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Bansal S, Shankar A, Gupta AK. Undifferentiated carcinoma of larynx of nasopharyngeal type. Online J Health Allied Sci. (2011) 10(1):1–2.

Google Scholar

2. Faisal M, Hartenbach S, Schratter A, Köstler WJ, Kaufmann H, Seemann R, et al. Lymphoepithelial carcinoma of larynx and hypopharynx: a rare clinicopathological entity. Cancers. (2020) 12(9):2431. doi: 10.3390/cancers12092431

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. da Costa REAR, da Silva Júnior RG, Magalhães LAN, Mendes JR, Dos Reis CA. Locally advanced lymphoepithelial carcinoma of the larynx/hypopharynx: a case report. Oral Oncol. (2021) 118:105373. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2021.105373

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Yap JA, Bundele MM, Lim MY, Goh J. Lymphoepithelial carcinoma of the larynx: an extremely rare tumour in a patient of Chinese descent. BMJ Case Rep. (2021) 14(10):e245945. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2021-245945

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Bugada D, Trozzi L, Renna D, Petruzzi G, Pichi B, Ricciardiello F, et al. Lymphoepithelial carcinoma of the larynx: an unusual response to EXTREME regimen therapy. A new option for treatment?. Transl Med Rep. (2021) 5(1). doi: 10.4081/tmr.9572

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Hammas N, Benmansour N, Amine M, Chbani L, Fatemi H. Lymphoepithelial carcinoma: a case report of a rare tumor of the larynx. BMC Clin Pathol. (2017) 17:24. doi: 10.1186/s12907-017-0061-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Marioni G, Mariuzzi L, Gaio E, Portaleone S, Pertoldi B, Staffieri A. Lymphoepithelial carcinoma of the larynx. Acta Otolaryngol. (2002) 122(4):429–34. doi: 10.1080/00016480260000148

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Kermani W, Belcadhi M, Sriha B, Abdelkéfi M. Epstein-Barr virus-associated lymphoepithelial carcinoma of the larynx. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. (2015) 132(4):231–3. doi: 10.1016/j.anorl.2015.05.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Merz H, Marnitz S, Erbersdobler A, Goektas O. Schmincke's tumor, carcinoma of the base of the tongue c T1-2, cN2c M0 - A case report. Case Rep Oncol. (2010) 3(1):77–82. doi: 10.1159/000302139

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Micheau C, Luboinski B, Schwaab G, Richard J, Cachin Y. Lymphoepitheliomas of the larynx (undifferentiated carcinomas of nasopharyngeal type). Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. (1979) 4(1):43–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.1979.tb01751.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Narozny W, Betlejewski A, Stankiewicz C, Kamiński M. Ventriculosaccular lymphoepithelioma of the larynx: case report and literature review. Head Neck. (1998) 20(5):425–9. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0347(199808)20:5%3C425::aid-hed11%3E3.0.co;2-f

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Coskun BU, Cinar U, Sener BM, Dadas B. Lymphoepithelial carcinoma of the larynx. Auris Nasus Larynx. (2005) 32(2):189–93. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2004.11.014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Lin S, Tham IW, Pan J, Han L, Chen Q, Lu JJ. Combined high-dose radiation therapy and systemic chemotherapy improves survival in patients with newly diagnosed metastatic nasopharyngeal cancer. Am J Clin Oncol. (2012) 35(5):474–9. doi: 10.1097/COC.0b013e31821a9452

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Guigay J, Temam S, Bourhis J, Pignon JP, Armand JP. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma and therapeutic management: the place of chemotherapy. Ann Oncol. (2006) 17(Suppl 10):x304–7. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdl278

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: lymphoepithelial carcinoma (LEC), Schmincke's tumor, rare tumor location, laryngeal malignancy, laser microsurgery, head and neck surgery

Citation: Nogal P, Staśkiewicz M, Jackowska J and Wierzbicka M (2022) Lymphepithelial carcinoma - a rare tumor of the larynx. Case Report. Front. Surg. 9:851481. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.851481

Received: 9 January 2022; Accepted: 6 October 2022;
Published: 28 October 2022.

Edited by:

Dennis Paul Orgill, Harvard Medical School, United States

Reviewed by:

Sudipta Chakrabarti, Midnapore City College, India
Alessandra Rinaldo, University of Udine School of Medicine, Italy
Zheng Wu, Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, China

© 2022 Nogal, Staśkiewicz, Jackowska and Wierzbicka. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Piotr Nogal cGlvbm9nY2hAZ21haWwuY29t

Specialty Section: This article was submitted to Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, a section of the journal Frontiers in Surgery

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.