Runhan Fu
Chi Zhang
Wei Wang1
Hengxing Zhou
Shiqing Feng
Lingxiao Chen- 1Department of Orthopaedics, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Shandong University Centre for Orthopaedics, Advanced Medical Research Institute, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- 2School of Physics and Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Longyan University, Longyan, China
- 3The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- 4Faculty of Medicine and Health, The Back Pain Research Team, Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, The Kolling Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
Editorial on the Research Topic
Advancing the understanding of surgical management for degenerative spine conditions
Degenerative spine conditions are common in adults, especially among the elderly. In parallel with the aged tendency of population worldwide, the prevalence of degenerative spine diseases has been increasing. There has also been an increasing trend in spine surgery worldwide (1–3). However, current understanding of surgical treatment for degenerative spine conditions is insufficient: on the one hand, the results of some studies indicated that surgery might not be better than nonsurgical treatment for some patients (4, 5); on the other hand, advancements in surgical techniques during recent years provide surgeons diverse options to perform the operations, however, evidence is lacking for which one should be preferred. In this Research Topic, a number of valuable articles involving basic knowledge, treatment (comparison of surgical procedures and learning curve of surgical technique) and prognosis (prediction model, prognostic factors and complications after surgery) of degenerative spine disorders have been published.
Learning the basic knowledge of spinal disorders helps to give us an overall understanding of surgical treatment. Several papers in this Research Topic gave us their understandings of pathogenesis of some spine diseases. The reason why cervical sagittal curvature of certain patients will be lordotic after laminoplasty is unclear. As pointed out by Qian et al. that may because the laminoplasty releases dorsal spinal cord from compression in pinching cervical spondylotic myelopathy (PCSM). Yang et al. took advantage of finite element analysis of CT images and found the maximum stress in involved segments of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) was higher compared with the control group. Two papers summarized theoretical knowledge of certain spine diseases. Xu et al. gave a detailed and authoritative review for ponticulus posticus, including the epidemiology, pathology, anatomy, clinical presentation, radiographic examination and surgical significance of ponticulus posticus. Mei et al. gave us a rare case of camptocormia related to Parkinson's disease and reviewed the literature on camptocormia.
A number of papers in the current Research Topic focused on comparing different surgical procedures used in spine surgery. Wasinpongwanich et al. in their systematic review and meta-analysis, summarized fusion rate, operative time, clinical outcomes, complications (e.g., total adverse events and revision rate) for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) vs. other techniques used in lumbar spine diseases. Focusing on elderly patients with single-level thoracolumbar severe osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (sOVCF), Zhou et al. provided evidence for the effects of percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) with vs. without posterior pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) on long-term spinal sagittal balance. Due to limited guideline information on whether indirect decompression is sufficient after oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF), Tseng et al. compared the effectiveness of the indirect decompression by OLIF with direct posterior decompression among lumbar foraminal stenosis patients. Radiofrequency denervation, as a common interventional treatment for chronic low back pain, has different emerging types such as pulsed radiofrequency denervation. In their systematic review, Li et al. comprehensively reviewed literature on radiofrequency denervation therapy in treating facet joint-derived chronic low back pain and compared efficacy of different radiofrequency denervation interventions using network meta-analysis.
Understanding the learning process of surgical techniques is beneficial to surgeons who hope to master one surgical technique. For the past few years, unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) has become a popular technique for spinal surgery. However, even for skilled spinal surgeons, there may be obstacles in the learning process of UBE technology. To this end, Chen et al. evaluated the learning curve of UBE using the cumulative summation (CUSUM) method analysis.
Prognosis research is of great importance in the context of current spine surgery. Several papers published in this Research Topic developed prediction model and investigated prognostic factors in different kinds of spine surgery. Clinical prediction models have plenty of applications in clinical practice. For instance, clinical prediction models help us to decide whether we need further testing, whether we need to start a treatment and which treatment need to be performed (6). Briguglio et al. tried to develop a hemoglobin-based prediction model to predict long-term recovery after spine surgery but regrettably, this model may not be reliable due to the low specificity. Nevertheless, as indicated by Briguglio et al. preoperative hemoglobin, interestingly, is one of the key laboratory biomarkers to predict long-term recovery after spine surgery. Identifying prognostic factors for patients who received spine surgery is also of great importance. By finding out factors which could provide prognostic information for patients, we may forecast the future outcomes in patients with a particular health condition and thus choose more suitable treatment under a specific situation. The risk factors for postoperative shoulder imbalance are rarely reported in adult scoliosis (AS). Hence, Ke et al. performed a detailed assessment of risk factors related to radiography in AS patients who underwent correction surgery. Deng et al. gave a comparison of sagittal balance and functional outcomes in lumbar fracture surgery patients using different intermediate pedicle screws with different insertion depth. Wei et al. examined risk factors of bone graft nonfusion for spinal tuberculosis patients who underwent lesion removal, bone graft fusion and internal fixation.
Complications after surgery also deserve more attention. Focusing on postoperative cage subsidence, a common complication after spine surgery, Jin et al. compared the subsidence rate in zero profile anchored spacer (ROI-C) and conventional cage and plate construct (CPC) in patients undergoing anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF). Cases series by Florence et al. provided eight cases who had hardware complications after placement of interspinous process devices (IPDs) and gave us experience in management of high risk IPD patients.
This Research Topic also included papers related to other orthopedic surgery, which give an additional view for spine surgery. For instance, Xu et al. developed a new surgical plan for adults with tibial-eminence fracture (TEF) and assessed the clinical effectiveness of day case arthroscopic-surgery treatment. Interestingly, thromboelastography (TEG) markers could forecast the occurrence of ecchymosis after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), as found by Chen et al.
We sincerely thank all authors who contributed to the current Research Topic “Advancing the Understanding of Surgical Management for Degenerative Spine Conditions”. We appreciate the reviewers' valuable comments and constructive suggestions. Also, we express our gratitude to the editorial team for their support.
We unfeignedly hope that articles in this Research Topic will help surgeons make the right decisions and inspire researchers to give a further exploration of surgical management for degenerative spine conditions.
Author contributions
All authors contributed to the article and approved it for publication. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Oglesby M, Fineberg SJ, Patel AA, Pelton MA, Singh K. Epidemiological trends in cervical spine surgery for degenerative diseases between 2002 and 2009. Spine. (2013) 38(14):1226–32. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828be75d
2. Grotle M, Småstuen MC, Fjeld O, Grøvle L, Helgeland J, Storheim K, et al. Lumbar spine surgery across 15 years: trends, complications and reoperations in a longitudinal observational study from Norway. BMJ open. (2019) 9(8):e028743. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028743
3. Ponkilainen VT, Huttunen TT, Neva MH, Pekkanen L, Repo JP, Mattila VM. National trends in lumbar spine decompression and fusion surgery in Finland, 1997–2018. Acta Orthop. (2021) 92(2):199–203. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2020.1839244
4. Brox JI, Sørensen R, Friis A, Nygaard Ø, Indahl A, Keller A, et al. Randomized clinical trial of lumbar instrumented fusion and cognitive intervention and exercises in patients with chronic low back pain and disc degeneration. Spine. (2003) 28(17):1913–21. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000083234.62751.7A
5. Fairbank J, Frost H, Wilson-MacDonald J, Yu LM, Barker K, Collins R. Randomised controlled trial to compare surgical stabilisation of the lumbar spine with an intensive rehabilitation programme for patients with chronic low back pain: the MRC spine stabilisation trial. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). (2005) 330(7502):1233. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38441.620417.8F
Keywords: degenerative spine conditions, spine surgery, evidence-based, surgical techniques, prognosis
Citation: Fu R, Zhang C, Wang W, Zeng W, Zhou H, Feng S and Chen L (2023) Editorial: Advancing the understanding of surgical management for degenerative spine conditions. Front. Surg. 9:1099978. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1099978
Received: 16 November 2022; Accepted: 13 December 2022;
Published: 9 January 2023.
Edited and Reviewd by: Sean D. Rundell, University of Washington, United States
© 2023 Fu, Zhang, Wang, Zeng, Zhou, Feng and Chen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Hengxing Zhou zhouhengxing@sdu.edu.cn Shiqing Feng shiqingfeng@sdu.edu.cn Lingxiao Chen lche4036@uni.sydney.edu.au
Specialty Section: This article was submitted to Orthopedic Surgery, a section of the journal Frontiers in Surgery