AUTHOR=Song Zihao , Ma Yongjie , Wang Yinqing , He Chuan , Li Guilin , Zhang Peng , Hong Tao , Sun Liyong , Hu Peng , Ye Ming , Zhang Hongqi
TITLE=Arteriovenous fistulas in the craniocervical junction region: With vs. without spinal arterial feeders
JOURNAL=Frontiers in Surgery
VOLUME=9
YEAR=2023
URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/surgery/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1076549
DOI=10.3389/fsurg.2022.1076549
ISSN=2296-875X
ABSTRACT=ObjectiveArteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) in the craniocervical junction (CCJ) region are a rare occurrence with special clinical manifestations. This study retrospectively reviewed patients with CCJ AVFs treated at our neurosurgical center, aiming to enhance the understanding of CCJ AVFs.
MethodsA total of 113 patients with CCJ AVFs treated at our neurosurgical center between January 2013 and December 2020 were enrolled. They were grouped as patients with CCJ AVFs with spinal arterial feeders (n = 20) and patients with CCJ AVF without spinal arterial feeders (n = 93). Clinical presentation, angiographic characteristics, intraoperative findings, and treatment outcomes were analyzed.
ResultsThe patients’ median age was 55 years (IQR 47.5–62 years). The proportion of males in the group without spinal arterial feeders was significantly higher (p = 0.001). Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) was the most common clinical presentation, especially in the group with spinal arterial feeders (p < 0.001). There were significant differences in AVF type, fistula location, and direction of the venous drainage between the two groups (p < 0.001). Intervention embolization combined with microsurgery was more common in treating AVFs with spinal arterial feeders (p = 0.006). Spinal arterial feeders did not affect the outcome (p = 0.275).
ConclusionsSAH was the most common presentation of CCJ AVFs in this study. Microsurgery and interventional embolization were optional treatment strategies. The angioarchitecture of CCJ AVFs was essential for selecting treatment strategies.