Skip to main content

CORRECTION article

Front. Surg., 11 November 2022
Sec. Surgical Oncology
Volume 9 - 2022 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1061238

Corrigendum: Comparison of clinical safety and feasibility between reduced-port laparoscopic radical gastrectomy and conventional laparoscopic radical gastrectomy: A retrospective study

This article is a correction to:

  1. Comparison of clinical safety and feasibility between reduced-port laparoscopic radical gastrectomy and conventional laparoscopic radical gastrectomy: A retrospective study

    1. Read original article
\r\nLiang Wang,&#x;Liang Wang1,†Yingfang Deng,&#x;Yingfang Deng2,†Su YanSu Yan1Xinfu MaXinfu Ma1Cheng WangCheng Wang1Wei MiaoWei Miao1Xiaoqian Chen \r\nXiaoqian Chen1*
  • 1Gastrointestinal Oncology Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University & Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Qinghai University, Xining, China
  • 2Medical-Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University & Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Qinghai University, Xining, China

A corrigendum on

Comparison of clinical safety and feasibility between reduced-port laparoscopic radical gastrectomy and conventional laparoscopic radical gastrectomy: A retrospective study

By Wang L, Deng Y, Yan S, Ma X, Wang C, Miao W and Chen X. (2022) Front. Surg. 9: 995194. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.995194

In the published article, there was an error in the author list, and author Yingfang Deng was excluded.

The corrected author list appears below:

Liang Wang1†, Yingfang Deng2†, Su Yan1, Xinfu Ma1, Cheng Wang1, Wei Miao1 and Xiaoqian Chen1*

In the published article, there was an error with the author contributions. The correct author contributions appear below:

XC is the corresponding author. LW and YD are the first author. XC contributed to the study concept and design. SY and XM conducted the laparoscopic radical gastrectomy. LW and YD wrote the manuscript. CW and WM collected and analyzed the data. XC revised and edited the manuscript. SY and XM are the guarantors of this study. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Keywords: conventional laparoscopic surgery, reduced-port laparoscopic surgery, single-incision laparoscopic surgery, natural orifice specimen extraction surgery, gastric cancer

Citation: Wang L, Deng Y, Yan S, Ma X, Wang C, Miao W and Chen X (2022) Corrigendum: Comparison of clinical safety and feasibility between reduced-port laparoscopic radical gastrectomy and conventional laparoscopic radical gastrectomy: A retrospective study. Front. Surg. 9:1061238. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1061238

Received: 4 October 2022; Accepted: 5 October 2022;
Published: 11 November 2022.

Approved by:

Frontiers in Surgery Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, Switzerland

© 2022 Wang, Deng, Yan, Ma, Wang, Miao and Chen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Xiaoqian Chen Y3hxOTI1QDE2My5jb20=

†These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

Specialty Section: This article was submitted to Surgical Oncology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Surgery

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.