Zhiwei Feng
Ming Ma1†- 1Department of Orthopaedics, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China
- 2Department of Orthopaedics, Nanchong Central Hospital, The Second Clinical Institute of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China
- 3North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China
Background: Arthritis with severe varus deformity remains a challenge in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Until recently, surgeons aimed at a neutral lower limb alignment when performing a TKA. However, the impact of TKA on the ankle joint has been ignored. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review to assess the clinical and radiological changes in the ankle joint after TKA on knees with severe varus deformity.
Methods: A systematic search was conducted in four English (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) and four Chinese (CBM, VIP, CNKI, and Wan Fang Database) databases. Screening of literature and extraction of data were independently performed by two researchers. The modified methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) was used to assess the quality.
Results: A total of eight studies were eligible, namely, four prospective and four retrospective studies. TKA resulted in a negative clinical effect in the ankle joint in patients with ankle osteoarthritis. Seven studies reported changes in the mechanical tibiofemoral angle, and four studies reported radiological changes in the hindfoot. The mean score of the MINORS was 9.8 out of eight (9–11).
Conclusion: As a result of the correction of the knee osteoarthritis with severe varus deformity following mechanically aligned TKA, the radiological malalignment of the ankle joint was improved. However, some patients experience increased ankle pain after undergoing TKA, especially, if there was a residual knee varus deformity, a stiff hindfoot with varus deformity, or ankle arthritis.
Introduction
Concomitant ankle osteoarthritis (OA) is frequently found in patients who undergo TKA, which is a classic surgery for elderly patients, who have experienced knee osteoarthritis (KOA), with multiple joint degenerative changes (1–3). Furthermore, malalignment of the knee joint caused by KOA could induce ankle tilt that would further aggravate ankle OA (4). Nonetheless, a few patients experienced increased or newly developed ankle pain after TKA (5). Surgeons lack a comprehensive consideration of the ankle condition of the patient when performing TKA.
Most of the patients with knee arthritis who undergo TKA have varying degrees of knee joint deformity, which may be associated with hindfoot deformity (6–8). Previous studies reported an association between varus alignment of the knee joint and valgus alignment of the hindfoot in patients with KOA (7, 8). Because the mild deformity of the knee joint can be compensated by the subtalar joint (8), the knee joint alignment modification after TKA can affect the hindfoot alignment. Previous studies have demonstrated that improvements in the hindfoot alignment have been observed in patients who experience OA after TKA (7, 9, 10). However, hindfoot valgus may show little improvement and persist after TKA (7, 9).
Patients with a hindfoot deformity present a particular challenge when undergoing TKA. Clarifying the relationship between hindfoot alignment and TKA is useful to change the current state. Thus, this systematic review attempted to assess prospective and retrospective cohort studies to determine the relationship between the radiological changes and clinical symptoms of the ankle joint following acute correction of the lower alignment using TKA for severe varus knee.
Methods
Literature Search
A systematic search was conducted in four English (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) and four Chinese (CBM, VIP, CNKI, and Wan Fang Database) databases from inception to December 2020 for relevant non-randomized controlled trials (nRCTs). The search was based on the following search terms: (“Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee” OR “Total knee arthroplasty” OR “Knee replacement” OR “TKA”) AND (“varus knee”) AND (“ankle alignment” OR “ankle deformity” OR “hindfoot alignment” OR “hindfoot deformity”). Additional records were obtained by screening the references. Detailed inclusion and exclusion criteria were formulated to review the results of the search by two reviewers (Feng ZH W and Ma M); the abstract was screened first before reading the full text.
Literature Inclusion and Exclusion
The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) nRCT, prospective or retrospective studies, and case control studies; (2) patients who underwent primary TKA as research participants; (3) with mechanical tibiofemoral angle (MTA), hindfoot alignment angle (HA), American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS), talar tilt (Tt), medial ankle joint space (MAJS), and medial ankle clear space (MACS) as indicators of the postoperative results; and (4) all retained studies should have the same hip knee ankle (HKA) goal, i.e., neutral mechanical alignment (MA). If not, the study should be excluded. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) diagnosis of a disease other than primary KOA; (2) KOA with valgus malalignment or rheumatoid arthritis; (3) history of femoral or tibial fractures in the past; (4) incomplete or missing research data; and (5) research data from animal experiments or theoretical analysis. Repeated publications, letters, case reports, comments, conference abstracts, or books were also excluded.
Data Extraction
We performed data extraction of all the included documents with predesigned tables, and all the studies were independently retrieved and assessed by two reviewers (ZH W Feng and M Ma). The extracted data should include the following: (1) title, first author, publication time, study design, clinical indicators, and radiological indicators; (2) patient characteristics such as number of patients, age, sex, number of patients who underwent TKA, and follow-up time; and (3) study details such as clinical results, radiological results, and conclusions. The extracted information was cross-checked to ensure accuracy. When there were disagreements, the decision was made by a third person.
Quality Assessment
The methodological quality of nRCTs was assessed using the modified MINORS (11). Eight questions for the nRCTs were used to score the relevant aspects of each study: a clear research purpose (I), continuous follow-up of patients (II), prospective research (III), suitable research purpose (IV), unbiased assessment of the research outcome (V), an appropriate follow-up period for the study (VI), the lost-to-follow-up rate was < 5% (VII), and perform a prospective calculation of the sample size (VIII).
The score criteria are as follows: not reported scored as 0, reported but inadequate scored as 1, and reported and adequate scored as 2. The MINORS score was assessed separately by the two reviewers (ZH W Feng and M Ma). Then, the categories were determined according to the study by Ekhtiari et al. (12): “0–4 points” were categorized as very low; “5–8 points” as low; “9–12 points” as good; and “13–16 points” as excellent.
Results
Study Selection
A total of 733 studies were included in this study. After removing 277 duplicates, the titles, abstracts, and full articles were screened, and 425 studies were further excluded. A total of eight eligible articles were considered for further analysis. The results of the study selection process are presented in Figure 1.
Figure 1. Flowchart for the identification of eligible studies.
Study Characteristics
A total of 913 patients and 1,157 knees were included in the eligible studies. All included studies were observational studies, and their publication years ranged from 2012 to 2019. The follow-up duration was extended from 6 months to 3 years. Tables 1, 2 show the characteristics of the included study.
Table 1. Study details.
Table 2. Study details.
Quality Assessment
We used the MINORS criteria to assess the methodological quality of the nRCTs. The categories were determined according to the research of Ekhtiari et al. (12). The quality evaluation of the included research literature is shown in Table 3.
Table 3. MINORS score.
Research Details
After removing duplicate studies and applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, eight studies were eligible for further analysis (Figure 1). The eligible studies included a total of 913 patients and 1,157 knees, which included four prospective cohort studies (13, 16, 17, 19) and four retrospective studies (5, 14, 15, 18). Seven studies (5, 13–17, 19) only studied the varus KOA, and one study (18) investigated both varus and valgus KOA. The characteristics of the eligible studies were extracted by two researchers (Table 1).
All the clinical and radiological outcomes of the knee and hindfoot after TKA are shown in Table 2. Four studies (5, 14, 17, 19) have reported the specific clinical outcomes of the knee and hindfoot after TKA. Okamoto et al. (5) reported that patients with hindfoot deformity after TKA would have a significant improvement in Knee Society Score, Knee Society Functional Score, and AOFAS. Chang et al. (14) reported that patients with ankle OA experienced increased ankle pain and poor clinical prognosis after TKA. Meanwhile, Palanisami et al. (17) reported that the Oxford Knee Score and AOFAS of patients with foot deformities after TKA significantly improved. Kim et al. (19) also reported that a persistent ankle varus deformity could be attributed to increased ankle pain after TKA.
Seven studies (5, 13–17, 19) compared the change in MTA pre- and postoperative, which found significant postoperative improvement of MTA after TKA. Five studies (13, 14, 16, 17, 19) included a radiological analysis of HA before and after TKA, and found significant improvement in hindfoot deformity. Cho et al. (13) also found that there was a weak negative correlation between the preoperative HA and MTA (−0.484, p < 0.001), and a very weak correlation between the postoperative MTA and postoperative HA at 6 weeks (−0.147, p = 0.040). Six studies (5, 14–16, 18, 19) included a radiological analysis of pre- and postoperative Tt, which found significant improvement. Lee et al. (18) found that the incidence of ankle arthritis would obviously increase when the preoperative Tt was closer to the ankle medial or when the angle of correction was greater after TKA. Lastly, three studies (14, 18, 19) included a radiological analysis of MAJS and MACS pre- and postoperatively, which showed a significant difference.
Discussion
Traditionally, obtaining a neutral lower limb alignment after a TKA was perceived as the ideal goal (20–23). However, since very few individuals have such anatomy, it implies a significant modification for most. Freeman et al. (24) first introduced the concept of right-angled femoral and tibial bone cuts in TKA-MA. Subsequently, Scuderi et al. (25), raised the importance of balancing the resulting medial–lateral and flexion–extension joint gaps. MA technique gradually became the gold standard in TKA. However, the recent studies found that MA-TKA generates disappointing efficacies (26, 27), probably due to MA-TKA produces a non-physiological prosthetic knee by changing the native anatomy, physiological ligament balance, and kinematics (28–31). Stephen Howell developed the kinematic alignment (KA) technique (28, 30). KA-TKA aims to generate a more physiological prosthetic knee joint by restoring the inherent knee joint anatomy and physiological soft tissue balance of the individual. Several studies have suggested that KA-TKA can accurately locate the position of the prosthesis (32), and also restore the native anatomy of the knee (32, 33) and physiological laxity (34, 35). The ultimate goal of TKA is to restore the anatomy and kinematics of native knees and provide a forgotten joint.
Recent studies have found that the alignment of the ankle joint and hindfoot could be affected by the malalignment of the lower limb (4, 5, 8, 36, 37). Moreover, the hindfoot deformity is closely associated with the lower limb alignment (38), and the clinical symptoms and radiographic outcome changes of the ankle joint and hindfoot in patients who underwent TKA would be influenced by changes in lower limb alignment (5). Chang et al. (14) found that there was less radiographic alignment change in the ankle and hindfoot when patients had ankle OA and increased ankle pain after TKA; and patients with a stiff hindfoot who underwent TKA experienced increased ankle pain, probably because of the inability to reorient the ankle after TKA. Nevertheless, different findings have been reported by these studies, but there have been no comprehensive reviews of this issue in the literature so far.
In this systematic review, we found that TKA may affect the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients with hindfoot deformity before TKA. In addition, the HA before TKA had a weak negative correlation with MTA (13). Clinically, four studies (5, 14, 17, 19) detected an obvious improvement in AOFAS at the hindfoot after TKA. However, increased ankle pain after TKA has also been reported in the patients with ankle OA or persistent knee deformity (14, 19). When patients have a residual deformity and pain of the hindfoot 6 weeks after TKA, they must receive active treatment because further improvement cannot be expected (13). Furthermore, five studies (13, 14, 16, 17, 19) reported an obvious radiological improvement in hindfoot alignment after TKA. Kim et al. (19) also reported a relationship between residual varus deformity and ankle pain after TKA.
Figure 2 shows the flowchart for the general treatment of patients with knee varus and ankle stiffness before and after TKA. Before TKA, the clinicians should perform clinical and radiological examinations of the ankle/hindfoot. If the patient has clinical or imaging problems with the ankle/hindfoot, the clinicians should inform the patient about the results and provide some treatment before and after TKA. If the patient does not have ankle/hindfoot problems before TKA, the clinician should tell them about possible problems after TKA. Patients should be informed and treated when discomfort occurs.
Figure 2. Flowchart in patients undergoing TKA.
This study has several limitations. First, eligible papers according to the search criteria used were not identified completely. Second, the eligible studies found for this systematic review had a relatively small number and a relatively high heterogeneous group, which could not be studied by meta-analysis. Third, the follow-up time in two studies (16, 17) was <2 years, which limited the ability to draw a long-term conclusion.
In conclusion, an improvement in the clinical function and radiological alignment of the hindfoot can be achieved following TKA. However, when patients had concomitant ankle OA with hindfoot stiffness, there is an increased ankle pain and a worse clinical outcome after TKA.
Therefore, the comprehensive preoperative evaluation of surgeons of the ankles of patients who complain of pain pre- and postoperatively and the correction of alignment during TKA should be given careful attention.
Data Availability Statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Author Contributions
ZF and MM worked on literature search, study review, and manuscript draft. YW, CY, and ZL prepared the tables and figures. YX worked on manuscript review, process supervision, and draft revision. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81874017, 81960403, and 82060405); the Natural Science Foundation of Gansu Province of China (20JR5RA320); the Cuiying Scientific and Technological Innovation Program of Lanzhou University Second Hospital (CY2017-ZD02).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Ranawat CS, Park CN, White PB, Meftah M, Bogner EA, Ranawat AS. Severe hand osteoarthritis strongly correlates with major joint involvement and surgical intervention. J Arthroplasty. (2016) 31:1693–7. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.01.044
2. Tallroth K, Harilainen A, Kerttula L, Sayed R. Ankle osteoarthritis is associated with knee osteoarthritis. Conclusions based on mechanical axis radiographs. Archiv Orthopaed Trauma Surg. (2008) 128:555–60. doi: 10.1007/s00402-007-0502-9
3. Cho HJ, Morey V, Kang JY, Kim KW, Kim TK. Prevalence and risk factors of spine, shoulder, hand, hip, and knee osteoarthritis in community-dwelling Koreans Older Than Age 65 years. Clin Orthopaed Relat Res. (2015) 473:3307–14. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4450-3
4. Gao F, Ma J, Sun W, Guo W, Li Z, Wang W. The influence of knee malalignment on the ankle alignment in varus and valgus gonarthrosis based on radiographic measurement. Eur J Radiol. (2016) 85:228–32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.11.021
5. Okamoto Y, Otsuki S, Jotoku T, Nakajima M, Neo M. Clinical usefulness of hindfoot assessment for total knee arthroplasty: persistent post-operative hindfoot pain and alignment in pre-existing severe knee deformity. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. (2017) 25:2632–9. doi: 10.1007/s00167-016-4122-1
6. Desai SS, Shetty GM, Song H-R, Lee SH, Kim TY, Hur CY. Effect of foot deformity on conventional mechanical axis deviation and ground mechanical axis deviation during single leg stance and two leg stance in genu varum. Knee. (2007) 14:452–7. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2007.07.009
7. Mullaji A, Shetty GM. Persistent hindfoot valgus causes lateral deviation of weightbearing axis after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthopaed Relat Res. (2011) 469:1154–60. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1703-z
8. Norton AA, Callaghan JJ, Amendola A, Phisitkul P, Wongsak S, Liu SS, et al. Correlation of knee and hindfoot deformities in advanced knee OA: compensatory hindfoot alignment and where it occurs. Clin Orthopaed Relat Res. (2015) 473:166–74. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3801-9
9. Chandler JT, Moskal JT. Evaluation of knee and hindfoot alignment before and after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective analysis. J Arthroplasty. (2004) 19:211–6. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2003.09.007
10. Hara Y, Ikoma K, Arai Y, Ohashi S, Maki M, Kubo T. Alteration of hindfoot alignment after total knee arthroplasty using a novel hindfoot alignment view. J Arthroplasty. (2015) 30:126–9. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.07.026
11. Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D, Kwiatkowski F, Panis Y, Chipponi J. Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg. (2003) 73:712–6. doi: 10.1046/j.1445-2197.2003.02748.x
12. Ekhtiari S, Horner NS, Bedi A, Ayeni OR, Khan M. The learning curve for the latarjet procedure: a systematic review. Orthop J Sports Med. (2018) 6:2325967118786930. doi: 10.1177/2325967118786930
13. Cho WS, Cho HS, Byun SE. Changes in hindfoot alignment after total knee arthroplasty in knee osteoarthritic patients with varus deformity. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. (2017) 25:3596–604. doi: 10.1007/s00167-016-4278-8
14. Chang CB, Jeong JH, Chang MJ, Yoon C, Song MK, Kang SB. Concomitant ankle osteoarthritis is related to increased ankle pain and a worse clinical outcome following total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. (2018) 100:735–41. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.00883
15. Gursu S, Sofu H, Verdonk P, Sahin V. Effects of total knee arthroplasty on ankle alignment in patients with varus gonarthrosis: do we sacrifice ankle to the knee? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. (2016) 24:2470–5. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3883-2
16. Jeong BO, Kim TY, Baek JH, Jung H, Song SH. Following the correction of varus deformity of the knee through total knee arthroplasty, significant compensatory changes occur not only at the ankle and subtalar joint, but also at the foot. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. (2018) 26:3230–7. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-4840-7
17. Palanisami DR, Rajasekaran RB, Reddy PK, Natesan R, Sethuraman A, Rajasekaran S. Foot loading pattern and hind foot alignment are corrected in varus knees following total knee arthroplasty: a pedobarographic analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. (2020) 28:1861–7. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05629-6
18. Lee JH, Jeong BO. Radiologic changes of ankle joint after total knee arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int. (2012) 33:1087–92. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2012.1087
19. Kim CW, Gwak HC, Kim JH, Lee CR, Kim JG, Oh M, et al. Radiologic factors affecting ankle pain before and after total knee arthroplasty for the varus osteoarthritic knee. J Foot Ankle Surg. (2018) 57:865–9. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2018.02.002
20. Abdel MP, Oussedik S, Parratte S, Lustig S, Haddad FS. Coronal alignment in total knee replacement: historical review, contemporary analysis, and future direction. Bone Joint J. (2014) 96-B:857–62. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B7.33946
21. Li Z, Esposito CI, Koch CN, Lee Y-Y, Padgett DE, Wright TM. Polyethylene damage increases with varus implant alignment in posterior-stabilized and constrained condylar knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthopaed Relat Res. (2017) 475:2981–91. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5477-4
22. van Hamersveld KT, Marang-van de Mheen PJ, Nelissen RGHH. The effect of coronal alignment on tibial component migration following total knee arthroplasty: a cohort study with long-term radiostereometric analysis results. J Bone Joint Surg Am. (2019) 101:1203–12. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00691
23. Almaawi AM, Hutt JRB, Masse V, Lavigne M, Vendittoli PA. The impact of mechanical and restricted kinematic alignment on knee anatomy in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. (2017) 32:2133–40. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.02.028
24. Freeman MA, Swanson SA, Todd RC. Total replacement of the knee using the Freeman-Swanson knee prosthesis. 1973. Clin Orthop Relat Res. (2003) 2003:4–21. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000093886.12372.74
25. Scuderi GR, Scott WN, Tchejeyan GH. The insall legacy in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. (2001) 2001:3–14. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200111000-00002
26. Carr AJ, Robertsson O, Graves S, Price AJ, Arden NK, Judge A, et al. Knee replacement. Lancet. (2012) 379:1331–40. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60752-6
27. Collins M, Lavigne M, Girard J, Vendittoli PA. Joint perception after hip or knee replacement surgery. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. (2012) 98:275–80. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2011.08.021
28. Rivière C, Lazic S, Boughton O, Wiart Y, Vïllet L, Cobb J. Current concepts for aligning knee implants: patient-specific or systematic? EFORT Open Rev. (2018) 3:1–6. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.170021
29. Rivière C, Iranpour F, Auvinet E, Aframian A, Asare K, Harris S, et al. Mechanical alignment technique for TKA: are there intrinsic technical limitations? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. (2017) 103:1057–67. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.06.017
30. Rivière C, Iranpour F, Auvinet E, Howell S, Vendittoli PA, Cobb J, et al. Alignment options for total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. (2017) 103:1047–56. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.07.010
31. Blakeney W, Beaulieu Y, Puliero B, Kiss MO, Vendittoli PA. Bone resection for mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty creates frequent gap modifications and imbalances. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. (2020) 28:1532–41. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05562-8
32. Rivière C, Iranpour F, Harris S, Auvinet E, Aframian A, Chabrand P, et al. The kinematic alignment technique for TKA reliably aligns the femoral component with the cylindrical axis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. (2017) 103:1069–73. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.06.016
33. Nedopil AJ, Singh AK, Howell SM, Hull ML. Does calipered kinematically aligned TKA restore native left to right symmetry of the lower limb and improve function? J Arthroplasty. (2018) 33:398–406. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.09.039
34. Shelton TJ, Howell SM, Hull ML. A total knee arthroplasty is stiffer when the intraoperative tibial force is greater than the native knee. J Knee Surg. (2019) 32:1008–14. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1675421
35. Koh IJ, Lin CC, Patel NA, Chalmers CE, Maniglio M, Han SB, et al. Kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty reproduces more native rollback and laxity than mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty: a matched pair cadaveric study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. (2019) 105:605–11. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.03.011
36. Lee KM, Chang CB, Park MS, Kang SB, Kim TK, Chung CY. Changes of knee joint and ankle joint orientations after high tibial osteotomy. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. (2015) 23:232–8. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2014.11.001
37. Gao F, Ma J, Sun W, Guo W, Li Z, Wang W. Radiographic assessment of knee-ankle alignment after total knee arthroplasty for varus and valgus knee osteoarthritis. Knee. (2017) 24:107–15. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2016.09.023
Keywords: systematic review, ankle, knee osteoarthritis, varus knee, total knee arthroplasty
Citation: Feng Z, Ma M, Wang Y, Yang C, Liu Z and Xia Y (2021) Clinical and Radiological Changes of Ankle in Knee Osteoarthritis With Varus After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review. Front. Surg. 8:713055. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.713055
Received: 21 May 2021; Accepted: 28 July 2021;
Published: 30 August 2021.
Edited by:
Sujit Kumar Tripathy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhubaneswar, IndiaReviewed by:
Konstantinos Markatos, Salamina Medical Center, GreecePascal-André Vendittoli, Université de Montréal, Canada
Copyright © 2021 Feng, Ma, Wang, Yang, Liu and Xia. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Yayi Xia, eGlheXkmI3gwMDA0MDtsenUuZWR1LmNu
†These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship