data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e1e6/7e1e61f01d233b91960c61442e748a5609c80a7c" alt="Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset"
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Stroke
Sec. Acute Stroke and Interventional Therapies
Volume 4 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fstro.2025.1517343
This article is part of the Research Topic Advancing Precision Medicine in Acute Stroke Care: Personalized Treatment Strategies and Outcomes View all 19 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Whole blood viscosity (WBV), reflecting the intrinsic resistance of blood flow, is an established predictor of stroke events in individuals. This study aims to correlate the WBV at different shear rates with the outcome of mechanical thrombectomy, known to be an effective treatment for large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke. This is a single-center retrospective study conducted at our comprehensive stroke center. The charts of 317 patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy within 6 hours of LVO stroke presentation were reviewed. The modified Rankin score (mRS) at discharge was used as the outcome measure, with individuals categorized as low (0-2) or high (3-6). WBV at different shear rates was calculated using De Simone's Formula. The T-test and Chi-square test were used to compare baseline continuous and categorical data, respectively, amongst the mRS study groups. We utilized multivariable logistic regression analyses to identify the independent risk factors associated with the outcome of interest following mechanical thrombectomy. In addition, Spearman rank order correlation was used to assess for r value between mRS and WBV at different shear rates. Baseline group characteristics, including demographics and medical history, were similar among the two study groups. Of note, our study found no significant differences in clinical outcomes between the two groups with WBV at high shear rate (OR 0.969, 95% CI 0.77-1.204, p = 0.780) and low shear rate (OR 0.998, 95% CI 0.988-1.008, p = 0.779) following mechanical thrombectomy. Spearman rank order correlation between mRS at discharge with WBV at high shear rate (r=0.058, p=0.123) and low shear rate (r=0.048, p=0.128) was nonsignificant. There is limited information of the effect of WBV at high and low shear rates on the clinical outcome following mechanical thrombectomy in patients with LVO. Our results revealed that WBV at high and low shear rates did not impact the functional outcome of mechanical thrombectomy. This result might be affected by the potential limitation of the formula used to derive the given shear rates. Despite this lack of association observed in our study, other contributors of viscosity may still potentially play a significant role in outcome following mechanical thrombectomy.
Keywords: Stroke, Ischemia, Thrombectomy, Viscosity, Large vessel occlusion, Modified rankin score
Received: 25 Oct 2024; Accepted: 24 Feb 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Thapa, Courville, Leonhard, Buchhanolla, Sheikh, Shah, Rai, Chokhawala, Hossain, Bhuiyan, Jordan and Kelley. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Monika Thapa, Louisiana State University Health Shreveport, Shreveport, 71103, Louisiana, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.