ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Sports Act. Living

Sec. Sport, Leisure, Tourism, and Events

Volume 7 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fspor.2025.1558415

This article is part of the Research TopicSports for Slow Tourism Enhancing HabitatsView all 3 articles

Recreation-and sport-led regeneration of urban water infrastructure

Provisionally accepted
  • Department of Sports Science, Faculty of Learning and Society, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Today, cities are to a growing extent looking for solutions for how urban infrastructure, like former industrial sites, can be developed into facilities for sport and recreation, as well as tourism. One example of such infrastructure is canals and former harbour areas. This paper aims at exploring the underlying factors behind, and the potential benefits and challenges of, recreation-and sport-led regeneration of urban water infrastructure with a focus on former harbours and canals, using three Scandinavian cities as examples: Copenhagen, Gothenburg and Malmö. A conceptual and theoretical frame is built around three perspectives: 1) contemporary trends and tendencies in sport and recreation, and spatial implications thereof, 2) urban regeneration, and 3) recreational spaces as ecosystem services. The empirical material is mainly based on six semi-structured interviews with informants involved in the planning, production and operation of the water infrastructure. As shown by the three examples, there are several benefits of a recreation-and sport-led regeneration of former harbours and canals. Those benefits include, for instance, ecosystem services, such as enhanced biodiversity and improved recreational opportunities, quality of life and well-being, as well as economic benefits in terms of tourism and positive attention. One of the examples also demonstrates that harbour regeneration could be an opportunity to develop methods for community participation and public-nonprofit partnerships. However, the examples highlight a number of challenges as well, such as polluted water and the technical issues and high costs involved in cleaning it; the provision of equal access to the water infrastructure; the creation of a safe co-existence for different actors and activities in the same water space; and diverse ownership, responsibility and regulation issues. To summarize, the paper shows that in a successful recreation-led regeneration of urban water infrastructure, the potential outcome is increased attractivity, activity and sustainability. tog bort: Secondly, urban regeneration as a concept is briefly 92 discussed. 93 tog bort: background 94 Kommenterad [KB1]: I have changed the order of the three perspectives and added an introduction focusing on waterfront development

Keywords: Sport, Recreation, Regeneration, Harbour, Canal, ecosystem services, sustainability, tourism

Received: 10 Jan 2025; Accepted: 10 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Book. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Karin Book, Department of Sports Science, Faculty of Learning and Society, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.