The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Sports Act. Living
Sec. Elite Sports and Performance Enhancement
Volume 7 - 2025 |
doi: 10.3389/fspor.2025.1546978
This article is part of the Research Topic 40 Years of Relative Age Effects in Sport: Lessons from the Past and Directions for the Future View all 10 articles
Relative age effects in European soccer: their association with contextual factors, impact on youth national teams' performance, and presence at the senior level
Provisionally accepted- 1 Università telematica San Raffaele, Rome, Lazio, Italy
- 2 Birmingham City University, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- 3 Victoria University, Australia, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- 4 University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia
- 5 University of Turin, Turin, Piedmont, Italy
- 6 Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Lazio, Italy
Soccer systems promote early identification and specialisation practices to satisfy short-and long-term goals -both from sporting performance and financial gains perspectives. In this context, players are (de)selected based on observed performance level and on their ability to conform to given organisational demands, leading to the proliferation of selection biases, such as relative age effects (RAEs), which research has shown to influence both developmental experiences and senior career achievements. Accordingly, this study aims to: (a) investigate the magnitude of RAEs among youth national teams (n = 80) who competed in one of the five editions (2018, 2019, 2022, 2023, and 2024) of the UEFA U17 European Soccer Championship, and their associations with teams' final ranking, (b) examine whether RAEs magnitude could be linked to cultural and contextual factors, and (c) further explore RAEs at senior level, by recording birth quarter (BQ) distribution of senior national team (n = 24) who competed at the 2024 UEFA Senior European Soccer Championship. Chi-square statistics revealed BQ1s were overrepresented at the U17 level (p < 0.001) and showed teams exhibiting low RAEs magnitudes recorded the highest likelihood (5.67) of finishing the tournament in the bottom four positions. Correlation analyses recorded small to moderate positive correlations between RAEs magnitude and population (.25) and FIFA points (.33). Further chi-square statistics revealed BQ1s continued to be overrepresented at the senior level, albeit with a weaker effect (p < 0.001). However, when the senior BQ distribution was compared to the expected distribution taken from the U17 population, this recorded more BQ4s and fewer BQ1s than expected (p < 0.001).Findings presented the focus on youth success and the competition for selection interact to reiterate RAEs' prevalence in soccer. Moreover, they highlighted initial RAEs define players' journey within the soccer system.
Keywords: relative age effects, birth advantages, youth soccer, talent identification, selection bias, talent development
Received: 17 Dec 2024; Accepted: 06 Feb 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Morganti, Kelly, Lascu, Brustio, Padua, Filetti, Porta, Briotti and Ruscello. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Elvira Padua, Università telematica San Raffaele, Rome, 00166, Lazio, Italy
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.