Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Sports Act. Living

Sec. Sports Politics, Policy and Law

Volume 7 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fspor.2025.1546222

This article is part of the Research Topic Sports Policy and Management in the Era of Sustainable Development Goals: Challenges and Opportunities View all 8 articles

Playing for Progress: Policy Advocacy in Sport for Development

Provisionally accepted
Louis Moustakas Louis Moustakas 1*Sarah Carney Sarah Carney 2Sally-Ann Jennifer Fischer Sally-Ann Jennifer Fischer 3Alana Richardson Alana Richardson 3Karen Petry Karen Petry 3Arnost Svoboda Arnost Svoboda 4Ansley Hofmann Ansley Hofmann 5Ben Sanders Ben Sanders 6
  • 1 University of Applied Sciences Kufstein, Kufstein, Austria
  • 2 Munster Technological University, Cork, County Cork, Ireland
  • 3 German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
  • 4 Palacký University, Olomouc, Olomouc, Olomouc, Czechia
  • 5 FairPlayPoint, Prague, Czechia
  • 6 International Platform on Sport and Development, Copenhagen, Denmark

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Sport for development (SFD) has emerged as a significant field of activity and has increasingly been critiqued for focusing on micro-level initiatives as a remedy to larger scale social or structural issues. This has led numerous scholars to propose more political meso or macro level approaches to deliver improved, sustainable outcomes. One such solution involves direct engagement in policy advocacy to support, and influence, policies that can directly benefit participants in SFD programmes. Against this background, our paper maps policy advocacy in the SFD field. Using results generated from a survey initiated in the context of a pan-European project, we map out the policy advocacy areas, activities and relationships within the sector. Our results show that most organisations engage in some form of advocacy, but much of this appears limited to the kind of self-interested advocacy that is designed to secure funding for organisational activities. Based on this, we argue that SFD actors should also engage in more progressive advocacy and suggest how research, as well as educational programming, can support this shift.

    Keywords: Social impact, power, Ideology, funding, sustainable development, Politics, advocacy

    Received: 16 Dec 2024; Accepted: 27 Feb 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Moustakas, Carney, Fischer, Richardson, Petry, Svoboda, Hofmann and Sanders. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Louis Moustakas, University of Applied Sciences Kufstein, Kufstein, Austria

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more