Skip to main content

BRIEF RESEARCH REPORT article

Front. Sports Act. Living

Sec. Sport, Leisure, Tourism, and Events

Volume 7 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fspor.2025.1515458

This article is part of the Research Topic Amplifying the Voices of Individuals with Visual Impairments and Deaf-blindness in the Context of Sports View all 3 articles

"…it's so funny to just throw off the blind girl" Subjective Experiences of Barriers in Physical Education with Visually Impaired Students - An Emancipatory Bad Practice Approach

Provisionally accepted
Martin Giese Martin Giese 1*Michelle Grenier Michelle Grenier 2
  • 1 University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
  • 2 University of New Hampshire, Durham, North Carolina, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    The objective of this study is to examine the subjective barriers experienced by blind and visually impaired students in general physical education (PE) using qualitative research methods. A total of 10 students, comprising six females and four males, between the ages of 17 and 19 (with an average age of 18.5 years) were interviewed. The students had been enrolled in mainstream schools at the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) level 2 and had elected to transfer to a boarding school for the visually impaired at the transition to ISCED level 3. In order to gain insight into the reasons behind the decisions to leave general education schooling and attend a boarding school, an emancipatory bad practice approach was employed. The findings indicate that physical education (PE) is a particularly challenging subject area. The assumption that general education practices and placements yield positive outcomes is contradicted by the interviews, which predominantly document negative experiences. In light of these findings, it is imperative that we examine the reasons for exclusion as experienced by marginalized groups in physical education.

    Keywords: Barriers1, physical education2, ableism3, visual impairment4, bad practice approach5

    Received: 22 Oct 2024; Accepted: 17 Feb 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Giese and Grenier. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Martin Giese, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more