The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Sports Act. Living
Sec. Physical Activity in the Prevention and Management of Disease
Volume 7 - 2025 |
doi: 10.3389/fspor.2025.1504840
This article is part of the Research Topic Optimal Physical Activity across the Lifespan for People of All Abilities View all 9 articles
A Randomized Comparative Effectiveness Trial to Evaluate Two Programs for Promotion of Physical Activity after Spinal Cord Injury in Manual Wheelchair Users
Provisionally accepted- 1 Pathokinesiology Laboratory, Rancho Los Amigos National Rehabilitation Center, Downey, United States
- 2 University of California, Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine, United States
- 3 Rancho Los Amigos National Rehabilitation Center, Downey, United States
Objective: The goal of this study was to determine the effectiveness of a novel whole of day activity accumulation (WODAA) physical exercise program. WODAA physical activity and physiological outcomes were compared to outcomes from individuals using a traditional planned arm crank exercise (PACE) program. Both programs included progressive exercise instruction, goal setting over a 4-month period, and utilization of a wrist-worn activity monitor (Fitbit Blaze/Versa, Fitbit Inc., San Francisco, CA).Design: Longitudinal, randomized, comparative effectiveness trial with collaborative goal setting.Setting: Research laboratory at a rehabilitation hospital and in participant’s homes and communities. Participants: Forty-nine manual wheelchair users with paraplegia.Outcome measures: Physical activity measurements and cardiometabolic data were collected before, during, and after the program. The primary measures were amount of daily arm activity (Steps) and time spent in different activity and heart rate zones. Results: Relative to baseline measures, participants in the WODAA group had significantly more daily arm movement/propulsion activity (Steps) and time spent in the Fairly and Very Active Zones and the Cardio Heart Rate Zone compared to those in the PACE group over the final month of the intervention (p<0.05). Minutes spent in other Activity and Heart Rate Zones were similar between groups. At final evaluation, diastolic blood pressure after a 6-Minute Push Test was significantly lower in the WODAA group, while no differences were found in distance traveled, systolic, or pre-test diastolic blood pressures. Metabolic bloodwork and shoulder pain scores did not change and were similar between groups. Conclusion: Depending on the measure used, these findings suggest that a WODAA approach to PA is comparable or more effective than a traditional PACE program in promoting physical activity in low-active manual wheelchair users with paraplegia.
Keywords: spinal cord injury, physical activity, Exercise, Cardiometabolic Health, Paraplegia, Tetraplegia Longitudinal, randomized, comparative effectiveness trial with collaborative goal setting
Received: 01 Oct 2024; Accepted: 20 Jan 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Martinez, Haubert, Eberly, Weiss and Rankin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Jeffery W Rankin, Rancho Los Amigos National Rehabilitation Center, Downey, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.