Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Sports Act. Living
Sec. Elite Sports and Performance Enhancement
Volume 6 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1499738

The Snow Must Go On: How German Cross-Country Skiers Maintained Training and Performance in the Face of Covid-19 Lockdowns

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Swedish Winter Sports Research Centre, Department of Health Sciences, Mid Sweden University, Sundsvall, Sweden
  • 2 Institute for Applied Training Science, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Lower Saxony, Germany
  • 3 Department of Environmental and Bioscience, School of Business, Innovation and Sustainability, Halmstad University, Halmstad, Halland, Sweden

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background: The Covid-19 pandemic in 2020 led to disruption of sporting events, with athletes obliged to comply with national lockdown restrictions. Purpose: To investigate the effect of the Covid-19 pandemic restrictions on national-team XC skiers’ annual and weekly training distribution from training diaries, results from submaximal and maximal physiological roller ski tests, and competition results from the International Ski and Snowboard Federation (FIS) world cup. Methods: Annual and weekly training type (specific, non-specific, strength, other) and intensity distribution (TID) data were collected for 12 German XC-skiers (Tier 4/5; BM: 67 ± 7kg; age 26 ± 3years; 6♀: V̇O2max 61.3 ± 3.4 ml·kg·min-1; 6♂: V̇O2max 72.5 ± 6.2 ml·kg·min-1). TID was categorized using a 5-zone scale with Zones 1-2 representative of intensities below the first lactate threshold (LT1), zone 3 between LT1 and LT2, and zones 4-5 above LT2. Training data were grouped by lockdown periods in season 20/21 (L1/L2) and compared to data from the corresponding weeks in 19/20 (C1/C2). Laboratory testing was performed in the general preparation period prior to competition for both seasons. Differences between seasons (C1/C2 vs. L1/L2) in training and performance variables were analysed using repeated-measures ANOVA and linear mixed models. Results: Total annual training duration increased by 9% during 20/21 (928 ± 79 h∙yr-1) compared to 19/20 (852 ± 73 h∙yr-1). During L1, skiers achieved a greater weekly training duration (mean differences (Δx̄):7.7 h·wk-1) compared to C1, due to an increase in non-specific training (Δx̄: 7.0 h·wk-1), whereas L2 resulted in greater weekly training compared with C2 due to a higher specific endurance training volume (Δx̄: 1.4 h). In 20/21 skiers performed a higher volume of Zone 1 (Δx̄: 149 h∙yr-1). Laboratory test- and FIS racing performance improved from 19/20 to 20/21. Conclusion: German XC skiers’ training characteristics, laboratory- and racing performance were significantly different between the two seasons. In fact, training duration as well as laboratory- and racing performance increased from 19/20 to 20/21. In spite of seasonal variation in performance and training within an Olympic cycle these findings might suggest that skiers adapted their training effectively to pandemic constraints, ultimately enhancing performance outcomes.

    Keywords: Endurance training, pandemic, Training Diaries, training intensity distribution, XC skiing

    Received: 21 Sep 2024; Accepted: 27 Nov 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Kock, Schürer, Staunton and Hanstock. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Hannes Kock, Swedish Winter Sports Research Centre, Department of Health Sciences, Mid Sweden University, Sundsvall, Sweden

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.