Skip to main content

OPINION article

Front. Sports Act. Living, 09 January 2025
Sec. Biomechanics and Control of Human Movement

Blood flow restricted walking: does the hypoxic environment compromise walking technique?

\r\nThomas Walden
Thomas Walden1*Nathan SmithNathan Smith2Alasdair Dempsey,Alasdair Dempsey3,4Andrew Michael JonsonAndrew Michael Jonson5Olivier Girard\r\nOlivier Girard6
  • 1The KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
  • 2Health Sciences, Exercise and Sport Science, University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, WA, Australia
  • 3School of Allied Health (Exercise Science), Murdoch University, Perth, WA, Australia
  • 4Centre for Molecular Medicine and Innovative Therapeutics, Murdoch University, Perth, WA, Australia
  • 5The Department of Health and Biostatistics, Faculty of Health, Arts and Design, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
  • 6School of Human Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia

Introduction

Implementing blood flow restriction (BFR) during walking is gaining momentum, with a benefit of this approach being reduced absolute external training intensity, still resulting in chronic adaptations to aerobic fitness (1) and muscular strength (2). BFR-walking leads to acute systemic and local physiological adjustments (3, 4). Systemically, hemodynamic stability is reduced, decreasing venous return, cardiac preload, and stroke volume (5). To compensate, heart rate increases to maintain cardiac output (6) while minute ventilation simultaneously increases as the demand for oxygen rises (2). Locally, reductions in oxygen delivery and removal of metabolic waste create a localized hypoxic environment, lowering muscular pH (3). Consequently, BFR-walking is considered a suitable exercise for load-compromised individuals such as older adults, injured athletes, and patients with chronic musculoskeletal disorders (7).

Literature outside of BFR research indicates acidic environments impair muscle contractility and/or develop a sub-optimal shortening velocity, reducing the power output of muscular contractions (8). Prolonged exposure to the localized hypoxic environment could disturb the contractility of leg muscles during walking. Of particular concern is the reduced contractility of the plantar-flexors, the predominant power generators walking (9). Altered submaximal contractibility of the plantar-flexors could cause neuro-mechanical compensatory strategies and redistribute a portion of the mechanical force created at the ankle to the hip and knee to maintain walking speed (10). To accommodate the redistribution of power, changes in spatio-temporal and/or kinematic characteristics would occur (10). Therefore, we intend to discuss how applying BFR may modify critical characteristics of one's natural gait cycle (Figure 1).

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Walking technique changes mediated by blood flow restriction. A hypothetical comparison of the mechanical strain, cardio-respiratory stress and metabolic stress mediated by the application of blood flow restriction and an illustration of the potential compensatory responses an individual may need to employ to maintain walking speed. Green represents low strain/stress; orange represents moderate strain/stress; red represents high strain or stress. Briefly, as blood flow restriction mediates fatigue, force-generation moves from predominantly the ankle to the knee and hip joints (additional knee and hip flexion during the stance phase to increase extension moment of both joints) so that walking speed can be maintained. Simultaneously, the additional knee and hip flexion during the stance phase lowers the height of one's centre of mass and, in conjunction with a wider step width, helps to increase stability.

The influence of muscular fatigue on walking technique

Power generation

Reduced musculoskeletal function in plantar-flexors requires proximal muscle compensation, redistributing a portion of the mechanical work from the ankle to the knee and hip to maintain walking speed (10). For example, Huang et al. (10) had young adults walk at 5.04 km/h wearing specialized boots bilaterally, setting the maximal plantar-flexion angle and, therefore, artificially mimicking reduced push-off power. A positive relationship was reported between plantar-flexion angle and force production, with the decrease of ankle extension lowering force production. This was compensated by a higher extension moment at the knee to maintain force production (10). Similar changes to the force-generation location were highlighted when comparing younger and older adults (11). The authors reported an age-related reduction in power generation within the trailing leg (plantar-flexors) during level and uphill walking at 4.5 km/h. To compensate, older adults produced greater force during the single-leg support phase, redistributing mechanical power production to the proximal muscles of the knee and hip joints (11).

Additional force generation at the knee and hip joints requires larger muscle groups (quadriceps, hamstrings, and gluteals) to be activated (12). Larger muscle groups are typically characterized by higher metabolic requirements, increasing the physiological demand of a given task and reducing walking economy (13). To mitigate the higher metabolic cost, individuals may unconsciously reduce their walking speed to a pace they can maintain without altering their walking technique (14). However, if walking speed is constant (common during BFR treadmill walking), neuro-mechanical alterations may occur, causing a faster rate of fatigue development and eventually premature task cessation (15).

Balance and stability

The body's center of mass during walking is kept predominantly within the base of support between the standing foot and the following contact point of the swinging limb (16). This allows optimal balance and stability, reduces fall risk, and minimizes the cost of locomotion (16). The introduction of fatigue increases inter-stride variability of trunk movement in both the frontal and sagittal planes, termed postural sway (17). In response, stride length and width are altered to maintain balance. For example, Helbostad et al. (16) investigated the impact of fatigue on walking technique among older adults. The fatigue group performed sit-to-stands as quickly and for as long as possible before walking at their preferred speed across the recording area. Participants within said fatigued group exhibited significantly larger step width and slower average walking speed (1.12 km/h fatigued group, 3.56 km/h non-fatigued group), compensatory strategies employed to preserve balance. In addition, step length variability increased, which could represent a compensatory strategy to control anterior/posterior acceleration of the trunk, hence why the study reported little to no postural sway in the sagittal plane.

Compensatory strategies to preserve balance when fatigued during a walking task are not limited to older adults. Nagano et al. (18) assessed walking techniques in young and older adults before and after a 6 min exhausting protocol to identify technique changes related to fatigue. Younger and older individuals reported increased double-support time during preferred speed walking (Older: 3.6 km/h, Younger: 4.21 km/h), another strategy to enhance balance. However, the extended double-limb support time requires increased step length to maintain walking speed (19). Speed maintenance causes increased step width variability, a change widely accepted as an indicator of reduced stability (19). Increased step width can also be detrimental to knee kinematics, exacerbating knee valgus (medial deviation) due to the positioning of the foot relative to the hip (20). As the primary lateral stabilizers of the knee (quadriceps and hamstrings) experience BFR-related fatigue, the gluteals may need to produce additional tension on the iliotibial band, shifting more muscular workload above the occlusion site. These findings highlight a sacrifice in stability when searching for optimal functionality, suggesting this compensatory strategy may not be sustainable across a prolonged walking period. Decreased walking speed and increased step width would inevitably be required to prioritize balance. Overall, balance and optimal functionality are prioritized regardless of age when fatigued.

Proprioception

Alterations in proprioceptive afferent and efferent signalling can reduce one's ability to sense the location of their limbs (21). Acidosis, ischemic and hypoxic environments directly impact afferent signalling, all elements of muscular fatigue (22). These environmental changes within the muscle reduce the firing frequency of muscle spindles and Golgi tendons, negatively influencing proprioceptive acuity (23). To compensate, afferent inputs from surrounding muscles, joints, vision, and the vestibular system are processed centrally by the cerebellum, so appropriate actions are implemented to maintain balance (21). Once processed, the firing frequency of efferent nerve pathways to the fatiguing limbs increases, activating additional motor units and, therefore, larger muscle fibers (21). A relationship between plantar- and dorsi-flexor muscular fatigue and deficits in postural control has been established (24). The inability to generate small, concise movements at the ankle joint in conjunction with the central processing of proprioceptive signalling reduces the control of one's center of mass, increasing postural sway in both the anterior/posterior and medial/lateral directions (24). The reduction in postural control requires modifications in walking technique to prioritize balance and stability. Additionally, the central processing of proprioceptive information also switches unconscious muscular actions to conscious, increasing the likelihood of a tripping event as obstacle avoidance becomes a dual/secondary task (25).

The impact of BFR on muscular fatigue

Limited research has investigated neuromuscular function during or following BFR-walking compared to the unrestricted equivalent. However, suggestions can be drawn from low-intensity BFR-resistance exercise research, which has explored how the acute hypoxic environment affects neuromuscular function (26). For example, performing four sets of knee extensions (30% one-repetition maximum) with continuous BFR caused larger reductions in force when compared to without BFR (26). The reduction in muscular performance following all sets suggests BFR mediates additional muscular fatigue distal to the occlusion site compared to the unrestricted equivalent. However, the force decrements within the BFR session dissipated within 2 min post-exercise to the same magnitude of recovery as the unrestricted equivalent post cuff deflation (27). These findings suggest the force decrements stem from the hypoxic environment impairing muscle contractility.

The current prescription guidelines for BFR-walking recommend occlusion be sustained continuously for up to 20 min, which far exceeds the durations (5–10 min) recommended for BFR-resistance exercise (7). Compared to the unrestricted equivalent, decreased muscular force during BFR-resistance exercise was observed less than 1 min into the exercise session (26). The decrements in muscle force continued rapidly as the BFR session progressed (26). The substantial duration of occlusion during BFR-walking could induce a reduction in muscle contractility, similar to BFR-resistance exercise. A decrease in muscle contractibility during BFR-walking would reduce movement speed (14) or reduce exercise time if speed was fixed (15). For example, Sakamaki-Sunaga et al. (15) concluded that BFR led to lower walking speeds (BFR: 4.79 km/h, Unrestricted 6.01 km/h) at which lactate threshold was achieved and reduced exercise time by approximately 12 min compared to the unrestricted group during a graded exercise test. Higher heart rate values were reported during unrestricted walks. Therefore, it could be suggested that the primary reason for task failure was not due to maximal cardiovascular workload. Instead, it may relate to the inability to produce sufficient muscular power to continue.

Potential impact of BFR on walking technique

We have examined the differences in gait kinematics during BFR and non-BFR walking at both a moderate (5.00 km/h) and fast (6.41 km/h) speed (28). Our main findings were increased knee flexion during stance phase, increased anterior trunk flexion, and increased step width. All findings were exacerbated during the fast condition. These changes could suggest individuals were prioritizing balance during BFR-walking, lowering their center of mass and increasing their base of support, a potential by-product of increased muscular fatigue. The observed increased joint flexion could then be transitioned into larger extension moments at the knee and hip during push-off and single-leg support phases, helping to increase vertical and anterior-posterior ground reaction forces. This is likely a compensatory strategy for a decline in submaximal contractibility of the gastrocnemius and soleus muscles, reducing the force required from the Achilles tendon during push-off (29), as force generation is redistributed to the knee and hip joints (30).

As the muscles that extend the hip (gluteals) are located above the occlusion site, they initially would not be directly influenced by the hypoxic environment, yet may be relied on more as exercise continues. Increased hip flexion throughout the gait cycle would shift the center of mass forward, potentially outside of one's base of support (12). A rise in stride-to-stride gait instability would result from the movement pattern reorganization, increasing the absolute metabolic cost of exercise (31). An increase in absolute energy requirements in combination with the hypoxic environment could amplify the rate of fatigue due to an intensifying effect (27). Sharp declines in muscle contractility may render the compensatory factors insufficient for some individuals, forcing a reduction of walking speed so that exercise can continue as the mechanical strain imposed on the locomotor system increases. Within our study (28), walking speed was prescribed at a fixed pace based on best practice recommendations. Not all participants were able to finish the prescribed walking time during the BFR sessions. This suggests that at fixed walking speeds, the reductions in contractibility can provoke premature task termination, a finding consistent with Sakamaki-Sunaga and colleagues (15).

Conclusion

Implementing continuous BFR during walking is associated with exacerbated fatigue and altered gait kinematics, which should be considered in exercise design, particularly for clinical populations. The reported changes in walking technique suggest that further research is required to expand the current BFR exercise guidelines. We suggest altering exercise prescription frameworks and additional monitoring to minimize the risk of falls and/or injury in clinical populations. From the available evidence, prescribing interval-like structures could extend exercise duration by maintaining walking technique and stabilizing the cost of locomotion. Depending on how individuals tolerate the additional fatigue and potential discomfort created by the continuous inflation, cuffs would remain inflated while the exercise stimulus pauses. Leaving the cuffs inflated would offset the rapid neuromuscular recovery observed post-occlusion. Secondly, due to the compensatory alterations associated with BFR, individuals with compromised gait patterns or those recovering from lower limb injuries should be closely supervised. Thirdly, performing the exercise task on a treadmill eliminates external factors (e.g., uneven walking surfaces) that could cause a tripping incident while offering exterior support (e.g., safety rails, harness). Lastly, implementing BFR during alternative exercise modalities (e.g., cycling, rowing, or elliptical) could reduce the risk of injurywhile still offering the physiological benefits of BFR.

Author contributions

TW: Conceptualization, Project administration, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. NS: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing. AD: Supervision, Writing – review & editing. AJ: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing. OG: Conceptualization, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Clarkson MJ, Conway L, Warmington SA. Blood flow restriction walking and physical function in older adults: a randomized control trial. J Sci Med Sport. (2017) 20:1041–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.04.012

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Abe T, Kearns CF, Sato Y. Muscle size and strength are increased following walk training with restricted venous blood flow from the leg muscle, Kaatsu-walk training. J Appl Physiol. (2006) 100:1460–6. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01267.2005

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Loenneke JP, Wilson JM, Wilson GJ. A mechanistic approach to blood flow occlusion. Int J Sports Med. (2010) 31:1–4. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1239499

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Walden TP, Girard O, Scott BR, Jonson AM, Peiffer JJ. Low-to moderate-intensity blood flow restricted walking is not an acute equivalent for unrestricted jogging in young active adults. Eur J Sport Sci. (2022) 23:1–10. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2022.2107436

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Sugawara J, Tomoto T, Tanaka H. Impact of leg blood flow restriction during walking on central arterial hemodynamics. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. (2015) 309:R732–9. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00095.2015

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Park S, Kim JK, Choi HM, Kim HG, Beekley MD, Nho H. Increase in maximal oxygen uptake following 2-week walk training with blood flow occlusion in athletes. Eur J Appl Physiol. (2010) 109:591–600. doi: 10.1007/s00421-010-1377-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Patterson SD, Hughes L, Warmington S, Burr JF, Scott BR, Owens J, et al. Blood flow restriction exercise position stand: considerations of methodology, application and safety. Front Physiol. (2019) 10:533. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00533

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Allen DG, Lamb GD, Westerblad H. Skeletal muscle fatigue: cellular mechanisms. Physiol Rev. (2008) 88:287–332. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00015.2007

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Mills PM, Barrett RS. Swing phase mechanics of healthy young and elderly men. Hum Mov Sci. (2001) 20:427–46. doi: 10.1016/S0167-9457(01)00061-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Huang T-WP, Shorter KA, Adamczyk PG, Kuo AD. Mechanical and energetic consequences of reduced ankle plantar-flexion in human walking. J Exp Biol. (2015) 218:3541–50. doi: 10.1242/jeb.113910

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Franz JR, Kram R. Advanced age affects the individual leg mechanics of level, uphill, and downhill walking. J Biomech. (2012) 46:535–40. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.09.032

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Browne MG, Franz JR. The independent effects of speed and propulsive force on joint power generation in walking. J Biomech. (2017) 55:48–55. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.02.011

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Peyré-Tartaruga LA, Dewolf AH, Di Prampero PE, Fábrica G, Malatesta D, Minetti AE, et al. Mechanical work as a (key) determinant of energy cost in human locomotion: recent findings and future directions. Exp Physiol. (2021) 106:1897–908. doi: 10.1113/EP089313

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Morrison S, Colberg SR, Parson HK, Neumann S, Handel R, Vinik EJ, et al. Walking-induced fatigue leads to increased falls risk in older adults. J Am Med Dir Assoc. (2016) 17:402–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.12.013

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Sakamaki-Sunaga M, Loenneke J, Thiebaud R, Abe T. Onset of blood lactate accumulation and peak oxygen uptake during graded walking test combined with and without restricted leg blood flow. Comp Exerc Physiol. (2012) 8:117–22. doi: 10.3920/CEP12007

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Helbostad JL, Leirfall S, Moe-Nilssen R, Sletvold O. Physical fatigue affects gait characteristics in older persons. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. (2007) 62:1010–5. doi: 10.1093/gerona/62.9.1010

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Vuillerme N, Forestier N, Nougier V. Attentional demands and postural sway: the effect of the calf muscles fatigue. Med Sci Sports Exerc. (2002) 34:1907–12. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200212000-00008

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Nagano H, James L, Sparrow WA, Begg RK. Effects of walking-induced fatigue on gait function and tripping risks in older adults. J Neuroeng Rehabil. (2014) 11:155. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-11-155

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Hausdorff JM, Rios DA, Edelberg HK. Gait variability and fall risk in community-living older adults: a 1-year prospective study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. (2001) 82:1050–6. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2001.24893

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Wilczyński B, Zorena K, Ślęzak D. Dynamic knee valgus in single-leg movement tasks. Potentially modifiable factors and exercise training options. A literature review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2020) 17:8208. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17218208

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Ribeiro F, Oliveir J. Factors influencing proprioception: what do they reveal? In: Klika V, editor. Biomechanics in Application. London, UK: IntechOpen (2011). p. 323–46. doi: 10.5772/20335

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Pedersen J, Lönn J, Hellström F, Djupsjöbacka M, Johansson H. Localized muscle fatigue decreases the acuity of the movement sense in the human shoulder. Med Sci Sports Exerc. (1999) 31:1047–52. doi: 10.1097/00005768-199907000-00019

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Hiemstra LA, Lo IKY, Fowler PJ. Effect of fatigue on knee proprioception: implications for dynamic stabilization. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. (2001) 31:598–605. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2001.31.10.598

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Gribble PA, Hertel J. Effect of lower-extremity muscle fatigue on postural control. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. (2004) 85:589–92. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.06.031

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Granacher U, Wolf I, Wehrle A, Bridenbaugh S, Kressig RW. Effects of muscle fatigue on gait characteristics under single and dual-task conditions in young and older adults. J Neuroeng Rehabil. (2010) 7:56. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-7-56

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Husmann F, Mittlmeier T, Bruhn S, Zschorlich V, Behrens M. Impact of blood flow restriction exercise on muscle fatigue development and recovery. Med Sci Sports Exerc. (2018) 50:436–46. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001475

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Loenneke JP, Thiebaud RS, Fahs CA, Rossow LM, Abe T, Bemben MG. Blood flow restriction does not result in prolonged decrements in torque. Eur J Appl Physiol. (2013) 113:923–31. doi: 10.1007/s00421-012-2502-x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Walden TP, Fairchild TJ, Girard O, Peiffer JJ, Jonson AM, Dempsey AR. Blood flow restricted walking alters gait kinematics. Eur J Sport Sci. (2023) 23:1–10. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2023.2194274

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Franz JR. The age-associated reduction in propulsive power generation in walking. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. (2016) 44:129–36. doi: 10.1249/JES.0000000000000086

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Bonnard M, Sirin A, Oddsson L, Thorstensson A. Different strategies to compensate for the effects of fatigue revealed by neuromuscular adaptation processes in humans. Neurosci Lett. (1994) 166:101–5. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(94)90850-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Malatesta D, Simar D, Dauvilliers Y, Candau R, Borrani F, Préfaut C, et al. Energy cost of walking and gait instability in healthy 65- and 80-yr-olds. J Appl Physiol. (2003) 95:2248–56. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01106.2002

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: blood flow restricted exercise, walking, fatigue, kinematics, blood flow restriction (BFR)

Citation: Walden T, Smith N, Dempsey A, Jonson AM and Girard O (2025) Blood flow restricted walking: does the hypoxic environment compromise walking technique? Front. Sports Act. Living 6:1481315. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1481315

Received: 15 August 2024; Accepted: 27 December 2024;
Published: 9 January 2025.

Edited by:

Navrag B. Singh, ETH Zürich, Switzerland

Reviewed by:

Sergio Perez Regalado, University of Granada, Spain
Chansol Hurr, Jeonbuk National University, Republic of Korea

Copyright: © 2025 Walden, Smith, Dempsey, Jonson and Girard. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Thomas Walden, dGhvbWFzLndhbGRlbkB1aG4uY2E=

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.