Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Sports Act. Living
Sec. Elite Sports and Performance Enhancement
Volume 6 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1444655

HEART RATE AND WEAPON RATE OF FIRE 1 Heart Rate of Fire: Exploring Direct Implementation of Physiological Measurements in Realistic Shoot/Don't-Shoot Simulations

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 United States Department of the Navy, Washington D.C., United States
  • 2 Naval Health Research Center, San Diego, California, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Shooting simulations provide an excellent opportunity to train use-of-force decisions in controlled environments. Recently, military and law enforcement organizations have expressed a growing desire to integrate physiological measurement into simulations for training and feedback purposes. Although participants can easily wear physiological monitors in these scenarios, direct implementation into training may not be simple. Theoretical problems exist in the ultra-short heart rate variability windows associated with use-of-force training, and practical problems emerge as existing scenario libraries at training organizations were not designed for physiological monitoring. Therefore, the current study explored the challenges and possibilities associated with direct implementation of physiological monitoring into an existing library of firearms training scenarios. The results revealed lower heart rate variability (approximately 6%)occurred in scenarios where participants did not have to fire weapons, indicating that don't-shoot scenarios may actually impose more cognitive stress on shooters. Additional evidence further demonstrated how both behavioral and physiological factors could be used concomitantly to predict unintentionally firing on non-hostile actors. However, behavioral measures were more predictive (e.g., β = .221) than physiological measures (e.g., β = -.132) when the latter metrics were limited to specific scenarios. Qualitative results suggest that simply applying physiological monitoring to existing shooting simulations may not yield optimal results because it would be difficult to directly integrate physiological measurement in a meaningful way without redesigning some elements of the simulations, the training procedure, or both. Therefore, future use-of-force shooting simulations should consider designing novel scenarios around the physiological measurement rather than directly implementing physiological assessments into existing libraries of scenarios.

    Keywords: Shooting, simulator, Rate of fire, Heart rate variability, semi-automatic, automatic

    Received: 06 Jun 2024; Accepted: 12 Aug 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Biggs, Jensen and Kelly. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Adam Biggs, United States Department of the Navy, Washington D.C., United States

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.