The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Sports Act. Living
Sec. Biomechanics and Control of Human Movement
Volume 6 - 2024 |
doi: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1444465
This article is part of the Research Topic Advancing Biomechanics: Enhancing Sports Performance, Mitigating Injury Risks, and Optimizing Athlete Rehabilitation View all 8 articles
A Comparative Analysis of Autograft Choices of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and their Effects on Muscle Strength and Joint Biomechanics
Provisionally accepted- 1 High Institute of Sport and Physical Education of Sfax, Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia
- 2 Primary Health Care Corporation (PHCC), Doha, Qatar
- 3 Higher Institute of Sport and Physical Education Kef, University of Jendouba, Tunis, Tunisia
- 4 Surgical Research Section, Department of Surgery, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha 3050, Qatar, Doha, Qatar
- 5 University of Dubai, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
- 6 University of Sousse, Faculty of Medicine of Sousse, laboratory of Physiology, Sousse, Tunisia., Sousse, Tunisia
Introduction: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is crucial to restore knee stability and function after ACL injuries, especially in physically-active individuals. Despite advances in surgical techniques and rehabilitation protocols, the choice of autograft has a significant impact on postoperative recovery, particularly on muscle strength and joint biomechanics. In this study, the effects of four autografts are investigated: Iliotibial band (ITB), combined ITB and hamstring tendon (ITB+HT), hamstring tendon (HT) and bone-tendon-bone (BTB) on quadriceps and hamstring peak torque (QPT and HPT) recovery and hamstring to quadriceps ratio (H:Q) to assess knee stability and function. Methods: Forty-two active-males (mean±standard deviation of age: 31.5±6.1 years, height: 177±6 cm, weight: 76±11 kg, body mass index: 24.5±2.2 kg/m²) with primary ACL ruptures were allocated to the four graft groups (ITB: n=16, ITB+HT: n=12, HT: n=7, BTB: n=7) and underwent a standardized rehabilitation protocol. Quadriceps and hamstring peak torque (QPT and HPT, respectively) as indicators of isokinetic muscle strength were assessed postoperatively and follow-up after approximately six-months (mean 6.29±1.70 months) Results: Significant differences in QPT and HPT recovery between the healthy and injured legs were found in all graft groups (P < 0.001). The BTB group showed the largest QPT deficit between healthy and injured legs (Δ = 133.4 Nm, Cohen's d = 8.05) and HPT deficit (Δ = 41.1 Nm, Cohen's d = 4.01). In contrast, the ITB+HT group showed the smallest deficits in QPT (Δ = 22.5 Nm, Cohen's d = 0.73) and HPT (Δ = 13.5 Nm, Cohen's d = 1.21). The BTB group also showed the largest deviation in H:Q ratios (Δ = -0.23, Cohen's d = 2.70), while the HT group showed a more balanced recovery with smaller significant deficits in H:Q ratios (Δ = -0.07, Cohen's d = 0.46).The BTB graft showed the most pronounced variations in QPT and HPT between healthy and injured legs in the short term, indicating the importance of longitudinally monitoring knee stability to determine the best autograft choice for ACLR. While all graft types contribute to muscle strength recovery, the HT graft may provide advantages in balancing muscle strength and potentially enhancing knee stability.
Keywords: ACL, Exercise Therapy, functional performance, Knee, orthopedic surgery, Postoperative Care, Rehabilitation, Sports Medicine
Received: 05 Jun 2024; Accepted: 18 Dec 2024.
Copyright: © 2024 Issaoui, Dergaa, Ghouili, El Omri, Guelmami, Chomier, Ghrairi, BEN SAAD and Moalla. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Ismail Dergaa, Primary Health Care Corporation (PHCC), Doha, Qatar
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.