Corrigendum: Hidden figures: Revisiting doping prevalence estimates previously reported for two major international sport events in the context of further empirical evidence and the extant literature

Petróczi, Andrea; Cruyff, Maarten; de Hon, Olivier; Sagoe, Dominic; Saugy, Martial

doi:10.3389/fspor.2023.1129320

CORRECTION article

Front. Sports Act. Living , 31 January 2023

Sec. Anti-doping Sciences & Integrity in Sport

Volume 5 - 2023 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2023.1129320

This article is part of the Research Topic Direct and Indirect Detection Methods and Biomarkers in Anti-Doping Sciences View all 4 articles

Corrigendum: Hidden figures: Revisiting doping prevalence estimates previously reported for two major international sport events in the context of further empirical evidence and the extant literature

This article is a correction to:

Hidden figures: Revisiting doping prevalence estimates previously reported for two major international sport events in the context of further empirical evidence and the extant literature
1. Read original article

$\r\nAndrea Petrczi,,$ Andrea Petróczi^1,2,3*

Maarten Cruyff⁴

Olivier de Hon⁵

Dominic Sagoe⁶ $Martial Saugy\r\n$ Martial Saugy⁷

¹School of Life Sciences, Pharmacy and Chemistry, Faculty of Health, Science, Social Care and Education, Kingston University, London, United Kingdom
²Department of Movement Sciences, Faculty of Movement and Rehabilitation Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit (KU) Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
³Willibald Gebhardt Research Institute, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
⁴Faculty of Social Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
⁵Doping Authority Netherlands, Capelle aan den IJssel, Netherlands
⁶Department of Psychosocial Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
⁷Research and Expertise in anti-Doping Sciences (REDs), Institute of Sport Sciences, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland

Corrigendum on

Hidden figures: Revisiting doping prevalence estimates previously reported for two major international sport events in the context of further empirical evidence and the extant literature

By Petróczi A, Cruy M, de Hon O, Sagoe D and Saugy M (2022) Front. Sports Act. Living 4:1017329. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2022.1017329

Correction to Table/Figure

In the published article, there was an error in table 4 as published. There was an error in the estimated % of admitted doping (d) for H2: 0.3031 ± 0.0800 was erroneously listed for both the estimated % of admitted doping (d) and for the estimated % of noncompliance (nc). The correct value for the estimated % of admitted doping (d) is 0 and the value of the estimated % of noncompliance (nc) remains 0.3031 ± 0.0800. The corrected Table 4 and its caption Estimated use of prohibited performance enhancing substances and/or methods at WCA (12-month prevalence) appear below.

TABLE 4

Table 4. Estimated use of prohibited performance enhancing substances and/or methods at WCA (12-month prevalence).

In Figure 3: Comparison of doping prevalence estimates for WCA and PAG between the two survey formats, and with literature evidence. Data extracted from Table 1 using the most relevant figure (i.e., elite level and current/last season/past 12 months) when multiple estimates are reported. In the figure legend ‘ABP Blood doping WAC 2021’ should read as ‘ABP Blood doping WCA 2011’.

Incorrect Supplementary Material

In the published article, there was an error in Supplementary Material 2: Detailed prevalence and noncompliance estimations, Table 2.1: Detailed prevalence and noncompliance estimations for WAC and PAG, 2011. Incorrect values were reported for ‘Estimation’. The correct material statement appears below.

The authors apologize for these error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Keywords: athlete, performance enhancement, doping, randomised response technique, prevalence, single sample count, prohibited substance, elite sport

Citation: Petróczi A, Cruyff M, de Hon O, Sagoe D and Saugy M (2023) Corrigendum: Hidden figures: Revisiting doping prevalence estimates previously reported for two major international sport events in the context of further empirical evidence and the extant literature. Front. Sports Act. Living 5:1129320. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2023.1129320

Received: 21 December 2022; Accepted: 3 January 2023;
Published: 31 January 2023.

Edited and Reviewed by: James Hopker, University of Kent, United Kingdom

© 2023 Petróczi, Cruyff, de Hon, Sagoe and Saugy. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Andrea Petróczi QS5QZXRyb2N6aUBraW5nc3Rvbi5hYy51aw==

Specialty Section: This article was submitted to Anti-doping Sciences & Integrity in Sport, a section of the journal Frontiers in Sports and Active Living

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Corrigendum: Hidden figures: Revisiting doping prevalence estimates previously reported for two major international sport events in the context of further empirical evidence and the extant literature

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good