Parts of this article's content have been modified or rectified in:
Erratum: Look to the stars—Is there anything that public health and rehabilitation can learn from elite sports?
Grégoire P. Millet
Karim Chamari- 1Institute of Sport Sciences, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- 2Aspetar, Orthopedic and Sports Medicine Hospital, FIFA Medical Center of Excellence, Doha, Qatar
Introduction
Recently, several medical doctors (1) or sports scientists (2) argued that the expertise gained in elite sport should be translated and applied for the benefit of many. In other words, public health and rehabilitation could improve preventive or therapeutic methods based on exercise by looking up at what the elite athletes are doing nowadays in terms of (i) how they train and monitor adaptations to exercise; (ii) the innovation they use in combining different stressors and/or in the multi-dimensional criteria assessment of their performance.
The examples supporting this claim were however limited to “11 for health programme” (1) or to four areas (e.g., individualized training prescription; health wearables; environmental conditions; and concurrent endurance-strength training) (2). There are obviously large differences in both characteristics of the individuals and training loads undergone between elite athletes and clinical or sedentary/under-active populations Therefore, careful adaptations of any method are needed and this top-to-bottom approach may not be applied for all. However, in the present opinion paper, we suggest that the benefits of looking up at elite sports, may bring wider potential benefits than previously described. We indeed argue that there are—at least—22 topics where public health and rehabilitation can learn and benefit from knowledge and know-how started and/or developed in elite sports. In this opinion letter, we state that improved strategies leading to larger positive outcomes in clinical setting may be obtained in the following areas:
A / Exercise prescription (1. Submaximal cardiovascular assessment; 2. Individualization of exercise intensity; 3. Prescribed interval-training based on VO2 kinetics; 4. Submaximal strength assessment; 5. Non-invasive assessment of diffusive and convective components of O2 transport; 6. Non-invasive assessment of the muscle oxidative capacity; 7. Non-invasive assessment of the muscle structural properties).
B/ Monitoring of fatigue and adaptations (8. Multidisciplinary approach; 9. Specific exercise wearables; 10. Non-invasive cardiovascular monitoring; 11. Coping strategy from extreme sports).
C/ Optimizing exercise dose-response to physical activity (12. Integration of environmental conditions; 13. Concurrent endurance-strength training; 14. Weight-reduced load; 15. Vascular occlusion; 16. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation; 17. Transcranial direct current stimulation; 18. Specific responses in women; 19. Exercise training quantification; 20. Predictive models; 21. Technological innovations in mobility; 22. Ethical considerations).
This opinion letter is not aiming at presenting in detail each of these points but rather overview the areas that are—in our view—the most promising ones for a more effective application of exercise for rehabilitation and health promotion in the general public (3):
Exercise prescription
Submaximal cardiovascular assessment
For long, prescription of exercise intensity was mainly based on expressing exercise intensity relative to maximal values measured either during an incremental test to exhaustion [e.g., % maximal heart rate—HR—or maximal oxygen consumption—VO2max (4)]. The determination of the second ventilatory threshold has later also been shown as important (5). Since the widely dissemination of the polarized training strategy in endurance athletes (6), the determination of the “aerobic” threshold (7) delineating the moderate intensity zone (8) became paramount.
The individualization of cardiovascular training based on intensity zones (e.g., moderate, heavy, severe, supramaximal) is now applied across all fitness levels, as well as being in patients recovering from cancer (9) or with musculoskeletal disorders such as low back pain (10) or osteoarthritis (11). Since there is no need of maximal exercise to determine submaximal thresholds, the accurate prescription of exercise intensity is accessible to a wider range of patients (e.g., heart failure or obese patients) for whom maximal test would be dangerous or squarely impossible (12). Moreover, digital tools are now available and render user-friendly and more accurate the non-invasive thresholds determination (13). Some authors have also suggested alternatives as the use of the walk-to-run transition speed, allowing to consider training in almost all patients, as far as they can walk fast enough to reach their “natural walk-to-run transition speed” as experimented in obese patients (14).
Individualization of exercise intensity
In the supramaximal (i.e., above velocity associated with VO2max) as well as in submaximal intensity zones, exercise intensity may be prescribed based on the different thresholds. As an example, to ensure exercise is performed at low to moderate intensity, the most obvious way is to expressed intensity in %vVT1 (e.g., 90% vVT1, velocity associated with the first ventilatory threshold); or, alternatively, to ensure an exercise at higher intensity (between vVT2 and vVO2max), potentially also expressing the intensity as % within this zone (e.g., Δ50% meaning 50% of the differences between vVT2 and vVO2max). Similarly, supramaximal exercise intensity can be determined as % of anaerobic speed reserve (i.e., difference between the maximal sprint speed and vVO2max) (15). Expressing intensities in % of a given boundary (e.g., VT2) does not take into account that the other boundaries (e.g., vVO2max) may differ between individuals (16).
To our knowledge, exercise intensities remain commonly expressed with absolute values (e.g., km/h or W) or as % of one “marker” (e.g., %vVO2max) but not as % of a given intensity zone. Since patients differ to a large extent in these markers, there is a high risk of error in the prescribed intensity if expressed relative to VO2max, for instance (see below). These commonly used practices of prescribing exercise don't acknowledge the individual variability of these metabolic boundaries (17). This is paramount for moderate intensity that is often recommended for many patients. For instance, 60%–70% of VO2max which is assumed to be a moderate exercise intensity for a fit person may in fact corresponds to supra-VT1, i.e., “heavy” intensity for some individuals. This would induce delayed post-exercise autonomic recovery and increased risk of overreaching or overtraining (18).
Prescribed interval-training based on VO2 kinetics
The “traditional” determination of the exercise intensity zones by the ventilatory or lactic thresholds has been challenged by a relatively recent approach based on the VO2 kinetics (19). That is the profile of VO2 following the onset of constant-load exercise that defines the exercise-intensity domain (e.g., moderate, heavy, severe, supramaximal) (8) in which the exercise is performed. The individualization of training based on these intensity zones is now applied across all fitness levels (19). The analysis of the fast and slow components of the VO2 dynamic response to exercise is paramount in endurance sports (8). Physiological responses to sessions of interval-training (20) or repeated sprints (21) are related to the VO2 kinetics parameters of the individuals. Moreover, the effectiveness of these sessions is increased by adjusting work-interval duration or intensity based on the VO2 kinetics parameters. For example, athletes with a slow VO2 kinetics would benefit to a large extent of increasing the duration of the work-interval (e.g., 30 s to 60 s) (20) or increasing the work-interval intensity (e.g., from 100% to 105% vVO2max) (22). The investigation of VO2 kinetics is performed in several diseases (19) as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (23), type-2 diabetes mellitus (24) or obesity (25). An important consideration is that this method does not require the patient to perform intense exercise to be assessed. It is beyond the scope of this article to describe how VO2 kinetics is altered across these diseases [see (19)] but to our knowledge there is no report yet of exercise prescription taking into account this factor in clinical populations.
Submaximal strength assessment
Determination of the load for strength training is commonly based on a maximal strength test (e.g., expressing the load in % of 1 RM, one repetition maximum (26). Since accurate loads can even be prescribed based on submaximal assessments (e.g., 6–12 RM) (27), strength training is henceforth relying less on % 1-RM. The possibility to estimate 1RM through submaximal tests (e.g., 6RM) to minimize the risk of injury would enable many patients (e.g., with osteoarthritis) (28) to benefit from accurate load prescription from this type of submaximal strength assessment for their muscle strengthening programs, hopefully bringing several supplementary beneficial health effects.
An alternative strength training method consists in velocity-based resistance training now commonly used successfully by strength-power athletes (29). To our knowledge, this innovative method is less frequently used in patients or elderly individuals known to develop their force at a lower rate for eliciting a lower rate of force development (30).
Non-invasive assessment of diffusive and convective components of O2 transport
VO2max is determined by both convective and diffusive limitations, as described by (31). This model requires invasive collection of arterial and muscle venous blood. Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) was recently proposed as a non-invasive approach to investigate these components. NIRS-derived signals of tissue saturation (Tissue Saturation Index, TSI) reflects the balance between O2 delivery and O2 utilization at the microvascular level within working skeletal muscles. This is allowing to non-invasively estimate the convection and diffusion components of VO2max (32). This promising method could optimize the services in clinical populations (33).
Non-invasive assessment of the muscle oxidative capacity
The muscle oxidative capacity is assessed from muscle tissues collected by invasive biopsies (34). This technique enables to investigate the mitochondrial adaptations (respiration, biogenesis …) following a given training intervention (35). NIRS is a method that has been used to determine the changes in semi-superficial muscle oxygenation in athletes (36) following various training intervention as strength (37) or hypoxic training (38). Recently, NIRS has been shown as a valid and non-invasive means of assessing both muscle oxidative and oxygen diffusing capacity in vivo (39). Such monitoring of both cardiovascular fitness and muscle oxidative properties may be valuable in many at-risk individuals; e.g., patients with obesity (40). Moreover, through exercise-induced myokines and muscle-to-brain signaling pathways (41), this non-invasive assessment could be used beyond cardiovascular or metabolic dysfunction; e.g., for patients with neurodegenerative diseases, as Parkinson disease (42).
Non-invasive assessment of the muscle structural properties
The determination of the muscle properties requests invasive biopsies to determine muscle structure, fibres composition as well as adaptation to a given exercise (e.g., muscle damage) (43). Histological analysis enables an accurate determination of the fast- vs. slow- twitch fibres composition (44). Recently a non-invasive alternative based on the muscle carnosine content by Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (45) has been developed with direct application in elite sport (46). Such innovation in the determination of human muscle fibre type composition is promising for many neuromuscular diseases' patients (e.g., myopathy) (47).
Combination of biomechanical, physiological and psychological parameters
Sport scientists and coaches aim to assess or improve the energetics, biomechanics and mental characteristics of their elite athletes. Training in endurance sports consists in increasing the total energy available (i.e., increasing the maximal aerobic power and the anaerobic capacity), decreasing the energy expenditure at a given intensity by improving the locomotion mechanics/technics of the athletes (48). Variables combining energy expenditure and velocity [e.g., energy cost (49)] or power output efficiency (50)) are used to determine the level or training adaptations in athletes. Similarly, multi-criteria psycho-physiological scales (e.g., combining objective training intensity/load and subjective feeling/mood responses) are relevant for monitoring athletes. Despite some limitations, rating of perceived exertion [Borg's scale (51)] is probably one of the most used tool in sport sciences. One of the main application of RPE is to quantify in a very simple way, the training load undergone by athletes to prevent overreaching (52). The integration of multidisciplinary methods has been shown to be highly relevant in elite athletes and to our knowledge is less spread in the clinical setting, certainly warranting more research in the field.
Monitoring of fatigue and adaptations
Specific exercise wearables
Until 20 years ago, sport science was limited to laboratory setting/testing. We needed non-wearable equipment to measure gas exchange, muscle oxygenation or muscle electromyography activity. For long, only HR was measured with HR monitors. Thanks to technological advancement and miniaturization of the devices, it is now possible to measure several time motion and/or physiological responses during exercise in the field [e.g., speed (GPS); power output (powermeter); stride frequency and several running mechanics parameters as contact time (Inertial Measurement Units); forces in the pedals or under the running shoes; heart rate (HR and HR variability); muscle oxygenation (portable Near-infrared spectroscopy); blood pressure; arterial saturation (pulse oximeter); breathing frequency (instrumented shirts); glycaemia by CGM (continuous glucose monitor); central temperature (ingestible pills); galvanic skin response; thoracic impedance (impedance sensors);… ]. Of importance is that many of these exercise wearables are now certified by the medical authorities (e.g., Apple Watch for ECG function approved by the FDA in USA). Sport is an area where there are many technological innovations and where many wearables are used. Not all the devices mentioned above are accessible for a daily use for the active individuals in the community but some have changed the way people train at all levels [e.g., GPS in running (53); powermeter in cycling (50)]. A key issue is about the accuracy and reliability of these wearables that are highly promoted by the industry (54). In fact, due to remaining limitations in data storage and algorithmic computation, very few of these devices are relevant for constant 24 h/24 h ambulatory monitoring of patients. In clinical setting, wearables are mainly used for safety reasons as surveillance and monitoring of the individuals. We claim that many wearables would also be useful to motivate and to monitor changes within the individual progress of the patients, and to provide continuous feedback for a more accurate and efficient exercise prescription (55, 56).
Non-invasive cardiovascular monitoring
Preventing overreaching and overtraining is an important concern for coaches and sport scientists (57). Among various means, resting heart rate variability or photoplethysmography (58) have been used in elite performance area, particularly in endurance sports. Despite that there is no consensus about the optimal procedures or variables to be measured, HRV is recognized as effective and is recorded on a daily basis by numerous elite athletes (59, 60).
HRV is also used extensively in clinical setting with many different types of patients (61, 62). HRV is then seen mainly as a valuable diagnostic metrics of health. However, HRV is rarely used for guiding, monitoring or amending a rehabilitation program as it is performed in sport where training program can be HRV-guided (63). Similarly, the monitoring of HR recovery post-exercise may be a complementary variable for monitoring the progress during rehabilitation, as shown in patients after acute coronary syndrome (64).
Coping strategy coming from extreme sports
Ultramarathons, with specific neuromuscular, renal, inflammatory and cardiovascular alteration/recovery kinetics, have been proposed as a unique experimental model to explore the responses of healthy humans to extreme load, fatigue and stress (65). Among those complications, three “specific” diseases may lead the patient to intensive care units (ICU): malignant hyperthermia, rhabdomyolysis or hyponatremia. However, contrary to many patients admitted in ICUs who are often with comorbidities, ultra-endurance runners are healthy individuals, which often makes the treatment or investigation of the mechanisms associated to such diseases easier than in the clinical population. This may suggest that clinicians would benefit from the reports and observations from ultra-endurance athletes or sport scientists involved in this field. For example, it is possible to investigate regulatory mechanisms or organs interplay as the relationship between acute kidney injury and some adverse cardiac dysfunctions (66). Another example comes from professional cycling: arterial endofibrosis is a common pathology in cyclists (67) and it led to clinical improvement in its diagnosis and treatment (68).
Dose-Response to exercise
Integration of environmental conditions as heat, cold or hypoxia
Altitude/hypoxic training (69) and heat acclimatization (70) are very important components of preparation in elite sport. Recent innovative methods have been developed [e.g., to cite only few: repeated sprint training in hypoxia—RSH—for team sport athletes (71); warm bath (72) for heat acclimatization); full body cryotherapy for improving recovery or rehabilitation (73)…]. Combination of several environmental stressors is also investigated (74). Some mechanisms explored in sport lead to clinical advancements [e.g., RSH-induced compensatory vasodilation that may be of interest in angiology for treatment of patients with endothelial dysfunction (75)]. Intermittent hypoxic conditioning, have been implemented for general health purposes or in clinical populations, for example in patients with diabetes (76) or neurodegenerative diseases (77). The effective “dose” (e.g., hypoxia severity; temperature level, duration and intermittent pattern of exposure) for any of these conditions are likely specific to type of patient and disease (78) and certainly warrants further promising investigations.
Concurrent endurance-strength training
For long, endurance athlete did not perform any strength training believing that this would be counterproductive. Nowadays however, strength and power training is an important component of the endurance athletes preparation (79). A large body of research has been published on the optimal combination of strength and aerobic training (i.e., concurrent training) for endurance and strength enhancement. Overall, it seems that strength-training—particularly if it includes plyometric stimuli—could be beneficial for endurance performance, while hypertrophy may be blunted by large amount of low-intensity training. The intra-session session sequence (i.e., endurance prior strength or vice-versa) is a question of importance in elite sport (80), general population (81) or in rehabilitation (82). For instance, the use of plyometric exercise has been shown to be beneficial for young obese females by reducing the pre-training observed metabolic abnormalities (83).
Similarly, the recommendations for exercise in elderly (i.e., “healthy aging”) are no longer limited to aerobic exercise for cardiovascular maintenance but also integrate exercises dedicated to the neuromuscular function (84); e.g., strength training for counterbalancing muscle force loss and sarcopenia (85); flexibility to maintain join amplitude or proprioception and agility/coordination to counterbalance altered balance and reduce the risks of fall (86). Strength training has indeed been shown to be effective even at very old ages (e.g., nonagenarians) (87).
Weight-reduced modalities (low-G; hypoxia; immersion)
For injured or in-rehabilitation athletes, several methods have been developed to decrease the mechanical load and enable exercise despite biomechanical constraints or pain like: running at relative lower body weight on a Low-Gravity treadmill (88), on a water immersion treadmill (89), uphill (90) or in hypoxia (91). The knowledge acquired on the physiological responses in such conditions may be useful for many clinical populations with locomotion limitation; for example for patients who are subject to excessive body weight (92) and/or elderly patients (93).
Vascular occlusion
Strength training at low load with vascular occlusion (e.g., blood flow restriction; BFR) enables gains in hypertrophy similar to those obtained with high-loads (94). Developed originally for clinical application, BFR is now extensively used by strength/power athletes looking for muscle mass development (95). This created an increased knowledge on the benefits and limitations of this method that is now benefiting the therapeutic applications again (96) in many diseases or pathologies. This has already been used in diabetic patients (97), for muscular rehabilitation (98), or to counterbalance sarcopenia in older individuals (99).
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation
Since early 70 s, neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) has been used for increasing muscle strength in athletes and its use has been soon transferred to clinical patients (100). Recent improvement in methods, devices and impulse characteristics has improved its effectiveness in both athletic (101), sedentary (102) or elderly (103) individuals. There is a large interest for the use of NMES in rehabilitation with many avenues for improving adaptations (104), particularly by implementing algorithm-based NMES therapy and dosing the treatment with tension-controlled NMES (105).
Transcranial direct current stimulation
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is one of the non-invasive brain stimulation techniques aiming at modulating cortical excitability (106). In sport, tDCS has been shown as a potential means of improving performance (107), particularly time to task failure (108). More recent meta-analyses reveal that the ergogenic effect of tDCS is probably small (109). Similarly, its therapeutic effectiveness in many pathologies (e.g., pain, Parkinson's disease, motor stroke, multiple sclerosis, epilepsy, Alzheimer's disease, depression, schizophrenia) is likely moderate (110). However, even if not supported by evidence, the recent interest for such “brain doping” techniques in sport (111, 112) may results in improvements in methods and devices, and presumably in ethical debates in a close future.
Specific responses in women
In both sport and exercise science (113) or medicine (114) areas, there is a lack of studies on the specificities of women, that are underrepresented in science, not only as researchers but also as research participants (115). Moreover, beyond these quantitative considerations, there is a major concern regarding methodological limitations (e.g., consideration of menstrual cycle phase, type of hormonal contraceptives and hormone replacement therapy, stage of menopause) and the low quality of many studies that precludes the generalization of the results to the entire female population (113, 116). There is an increasing body of recent researches in sport sciences about specific characteristics of women; e.g., the effects of menstrual cycle (117), pregnancy (118) or menopause (119) on the responses to exercise. This led to improved management of training load (120) or reduced RED-S (i.e., relative energy deficiency in sport) (121) in elite female athletes. To our knowledge, this body of research on the prescription of exercise for preventive or therapeutic purposes is less developed, warranting promising female-centred research for the future.
Exercise training quantification
Several methods of quantification of the training stimulus (e.g., training loads) are used in sport science. Based on the records of HR (122), training velocities (123) or RPE (124) for every training session, these training load assessment methods aim at quantifying the load either to improve sport performance and/or to prevent overreaching (52), illnesses (125) or injuries (126). Training loads are also the foundation of the different types of periodization in sport; i.e., polarized (6), block (127) or pyramidal (128) training. The translation of these training patterns, based on objective training load measurement, may benefit the long-term exercise-based rehabilitation program (129).
Predictive models of the exercise effects on health
The relationships between training content/load and fluctuation of performance are extensively investigated in elite sport (130). Initiated by Banister (122), several model exist and may help predicting short- or long-term changes in performance (131). In most of these models, performance is calculated as the balance between negative (i.e., fatigue) and positive (i.e., fitness) antagonistic functions. Such models were shown useful in many sports as triathlon (132) or swimming (133). Such predictive models of the relationships between exercise stimulus and the primary health outcomes may also be effective in clinical setting but may require to combine different types of monitored variables beyond training load (e.g., neuromuscular function, HRV, psychological wellbeing, past injury history) similarly to an approach implemented in elite sport (134).
Technological innovations in mobility
Paralympic elite sport is a growing area of innovation in sport sciences. Many paralympic sports require sophisticated technological modifications (e.g., in prosthetic and wheelchair devices) (135). Such technology advancement may be seen as unfair (136) and the potential technological advantage for a Paralympian, when competing against an Olympian, is unclear (137). However, beyond performance, the innovation is also for improving safety (138) with a direct impact for the stability/safety of equipment used daily by disable individuals (139), potentially bringing to the latter a substantial improvement of their quality of life.
Ethical considerations
The increase of data availability has potential associated issues, as data ownership and data transfer could potentially lead to ethical issues in case of breach of confidentiality. In elite sport, a recent gathering of professional football (soccer) players can give glimpse on the potential issues with the ownership and use of the data (https://fifpro.org). The latter group of players and professionals created the Charter of Player Data Rights, aiming at implementing global industry standards in order to protect the players' privacy and allowing them to protect and benefit from personal rights for the access and management of the information relative to their health status and performance scores. We believe that the developers of health care technologies and tools shall continuously check the data protection rules/laws, in order to be proactive in this field hopefully ensuring a healthy use of their products by respecting ethics and data confidentiality (EU's 2016 General Data Protection Regulation GDPR).
Conclusion
In this opinion letter, we listed 22 topics where sport sciences may benefit and be of great value for enhancing public health and rehabilitation. We acknowledge that there may be other points where a better interplay between sport scientists and medical researchers should be valuably considered. To conclude, the main objective of this letter is to claim for a better integration of exercise science—including the ones that has been developed with elite athletes—for a greater use in preventive medicine for a better health in the general population.
Funding
Open access funding was provided by the University of Lausanne.
Author contributions
All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Thornton JS, Patricios J, Kemp J, Engebretsen L, Drezner J. Robin Hood in SEM? What can we take from elite sport to give back to wider public health? Br J Sports Med. (2021) 55(17):949–50. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2021-104266
2. Millet GP, Seiler S, Millet GY. Opportunities and obstacles of translating elite sport research to public health. Br J Sports Med. (2022) 56(2):64–5. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2021-104374
3. Pronk NP, Anderson LH, Crain AL, Martinson BC, O'Connor PJ, Sherwood NE, et al. Meeting recommendations for multiple healthy lifestyle factors. Prevalence, clustering, and predictors among adolescent, adult, and senior health plan members. Am J Prev Med. (2004) 27(2 Suppl):25–33. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.04.022
4. Astrand PO, Saltin B. Maximal oxygen uptake and heart rate in various types of muscular activity. J Appl Physiol. (1961) 16:977–81. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1961.16.6.977
5. Wasserman K, Whipp BJ, Koyal SN, Beaver WL. Anaerobic threshold and respiratory gas exchange during exercise. J Appl Physiol. (1973) 35(2):236–43. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1973.35.2.236
6. Seiler KS, Kjerland GO. Quantifying training intensity distribution in elite endurance athletes: is there evidence for an “optimal” distribution? Scand J Med Sci Sports. (2006) 16(1):49–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2004.00418.x
7. Kindermann W. [Principles of diagnosing aerobic and anaerobic capacity]. Schweiz Z Sportmed. (1984) 32(3):69–74.6494885
8. Burnley M, Jones AM. Oxygen uptake kinetics as a determinant of sports performance. Eur J Sport Sci. (2007) 7(2):63–79. doi: 10.1080/17461390701456148
9. Adamsen L, Quist M, Andersen C, Moller T, Herrstedt J, Kronborg D, et al. Effect of a multimodal high intensity exercise intervention in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: randomised controlled trial. Br Med J. (2009) 339:b3410. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b3410
10. Tsauo JY, Chen WH, Liang HW, Jang Y. The effectiveness of a functional training programme for patients with chronic low back pain--a pilot study. Disabil Rehabil. (2009) 31(13):1100–6. doi: 10.1080/09638280802511047
11. van Doormaal MCM, Meerhoff GA, Vliet Vlieland TPM, Peter WF. A clinical practice guideline for physical therapy in patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis. Musculoskeletal Care. (2020) 18(4):575–95. doi: 10.1002/msc.1492
12. Davies SW, Emery TM, Watling MI, Wannamethee G, Lipkin DP. A critical threshold of exercise capacity in the ventilatory response to exercise in heart failure. Br Heart J. (1991) 65(4):179–83. doi: 10.1136/hrt.65.4.179
13. Keir DA, Iannetta D, Mattioni Maturana F, Kowalchuk JM, Murias JM. Identification of non-invasive exercise thresholds: methods, strategies, and an online app. Sports Med. (2022) 52(2):237–55. doi: 10.1007/s40279-021-01581-z
14. Beltaifa L, Chaouachi A, Zerifi R, Boussaidi L, Bouzrati I, Abid A, et al. Walk-run transition speed training as an efficient exercise adjunct to dietary restriction in the management of obesity: a prospective intervention pilot study. Obes Facts. (2011) 4(1):45–52. doi: 10.1159/000324579
15. Sandford GN, Laursen PB, Buchheit M. Anaerobic speed/power reserve and sport performance: scientific basis, current applications and future directions. Sports Med. (2021) 51(10):2017–28. doi: 10.1007/s40279-021-01523-9
16. Jamnick NA, Pettitt RW, Granata C, Pyne DB, Bishop DJ. An examination and critique of current methods to determine exercise intensity. Sports Med. (2020) 50(10):1729–56. doi: 10.1007/s40279-020-01322-8
17. MacIntosh BR, Murias JM, Keir DA, Weir JM. What is moderate to vigorous exercise intensity? Front Physiol. (2021) 12:682233. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.682233
18. Seiler S, Haugen O, Kuffel E. Autonomic recovery after exercise in trained athletes: intensity and duration effects. Med Sci Sports Exerc. (2007) 39(8):1366–73. doi: 10.1249/mss.0b013e318060f17d
19. Poole DC, Jones AM. Oxygen uptake kinetics. Compr Physiol. (2012) 2(2):933–96. doi: 10.1002/cphy.c100072
20. Millet GP, Candau R, Fattori P, Bignet F, Varray A. VO2 Responses to different intermittent runs at velocity associated with VO2max. Can J Appl Physiol. (2003) 28(3):410–23. doi: 10.1139/h03-030
21. Dupont G, Millet GP, Guinhouya C, Berthoin S. Relationship between oxygen uptake kinetics and performance in repeated running sprints. Eur J Appl Physiol. (2005) 95(1):27–34. doi: 10.1007/s00421-005-1382-8
22. Millet GP, Libicz S, Borrani F, Fattori P, Bignet F, Candau R. Effects of increased intensity of intermittent training in runners with differing VO2 kinetics. Eur J Appl Physiol. (2003) 90(1-2):50–7. doi: 10.1007/s00421-003-0844-0
23. Palange P, Galassetti P, Mannix ET, Farber MO, Manfredi F, Serra P, et al. Oxygen effect on O2 deficit and VO2 kinetics during exercise in obstructive pulmonary disease. J Appl Physiol (1985). (1995) 78(6):2228–34. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1995.78.6.2228
24. Regensteiner JG, Bauer TA, Reusch JE, Brandenburg SL, Sippel JM, Vogelsong AM, et al. Abnormal oxygen uptake kinetic responses in women with type II diabetes mellitus. J Appl Physiol (1985). (1998) 85(1):310–7. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1998.85.1.310
25. Salvadego D, Lazzer S, Busti C, Galli R, Agosti F, Lafortuna C, et al. Gas exchange kinetics in obese adolescents. Inferences on exercise tolerance and prescription. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. (2010) 299(5):R1298–305. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00038.2010
26. Berger RA. Application of research findings in progressive resistance exercise to physical therapy. J Assoc Phys Ment Rehabil. (1965) 19(6):200–3.5838459
27. Kraemer WJ, Adams K, Cafarelli E, Dudley GA, Dooly C, Feigenbaum MS, et al. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Progression models in resistance training for healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. (2002) 34(2):364–80. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200202000-00027
28. McNair PJ, Colvin M, Reid D. Predicting maximal strength of quadriceps from submaximal performance in individuals with knee joint osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). (2011) 63(2):216–22. doi: 10.1002/acr.20368
29. Held S, Speer K, Rappelt L, Wicker P, Donath L. The effectiveness of traditional vs. velocity-based strength training on explosive and maximal strength performance: a network meta-analysis. Front Physiol. (2022) 13:926972. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.926972
30. Correa TGC, Donato SVS, Lima KCA, Pereira RV, Uygur M, de Freitas PB. Age- and sex-related differences in the maximum muscle performance and rate of force development scaling factor of precision grip muscles. Motor Control. (2020) 24(2):274–90. doi: 10.1123/mc.2019-0021
31. Wagner PD. Central and peripheral aspects of oxygen transport and adaptations with exercise. Sports Med. (1991) 11(3):133–42. doi: 10.2165/00007256-199111030-00001
32. Manferdelli G, Narang B, Bourdillon N, Debevec T, Millet GP. Physiological responses to exercise in hypoxia in preterm adults: convective and diffusive limitations in the O2 transport. Med Sci Sports Exerc. (2022). doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000003077
33. Grassi B, Quaresima V. Near-infrared spectroscopy and skeletal muscle oxidative function in vivo in health and disease: a review from an exercise physiology perspective. J Biomed Opt. (2016) 21(9):091313. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.21.9.091313
34. Holloszy JO. Biochemical adaptations in muscle. Effects of exercise on mitochondrial oxygen uptake and respiratory enzyme activity in skeletal muscle. J Biol Chem. (1967) 242(9):2278–82. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)96046-1
35. Roels B, Thomas C, Bentley DJ, Mercier J, Hayot M, Millet G. Effects of intermittent hypoxic training on amino and fatty acid oxidative combustion in human permeabilized muscle fibers. J Appl Physiol. (2007) 102(1):79–86. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01319.2005
36. Brizendine JT, Ryan TE, Larson RD, McCully KK. Skeletal muscle metabolism in endurance athletes with near-infrared spectroscopy. Med Sci Sports Exerc. (2013) 45(5):869–75. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31827e0eb6
37. Salvadego D, Domenis R, Lazzer S, Porcelli S, Rittweger J, Rizzo G, et al. Skeletal muscle oxidative function in vivo and ex vivo in athletes with marked hypertrophy from resistance training. J Appl Physiol (1985). (2013) 114(11):1527–35. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00883.2012
38. Brocherie F, Millet GP, D'Hulst G, Van Thienen R, Deldicque L, Girard O. Repeated maximal-intensity hypoxic exercise superimposed to hypoxic residence boosts skeletal muscle transcriptional responses in elite team-sport athletes. Acta Physiol (Oxf). (2018) 222(1). doi: 10.1111/apha.12851
39. Pilotto AM, Adami A, Mazzolari R, Brocca L, Crea E, Zuccarelli L, et al. Near-infrared spectroscopy estimation of combined skeletal muscle oxidative capacity and O2 diffusion capacity in humans. J Physiol. (2022) 600(18):4153–68. doi: 10.1113/JP283267
40. Boudina S, Sena S, O'Neill BT, Tathireddy P, Young ME, Abel ED. Reduced mitochondrial oxidative capacity and increased mitochondrial uncoupling impair myocardial energetics in obesity. Circulation. (2005) 112(17):2686–95. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.554360
41. Burtscher J, Millet GP, Place N, Kayser B, Zanou N. The muscle-brain axis and neurodegenerative diseases: the key role of mitochondria in exercise-induced neuroprotection. Int J Mol Sci. (2021) 22(12). doi: 10.3390/ijms22126479
42. Harris DM. Using near-infrared spectroscopy to explore cardiovascular function and muscle oxidative properties within people with Parkinson's disease. J Physiol. (2022) 600(22):4807–9. doi: 10.1113/JP283759
43. Roth SM, Martel GF, Rogers MA. Muscle biopsy and muscle fiber hypercontraction: a brief review. Eur J Appl Physiol. (2000) 83(4–5):239–45. doi: 10.1007/s004210000287
44. Edstrom L, Ekblom B. Differences in sizes of red and white muscle fibres in vastus lateralis of musculus quadriceps femoris of normal individuals and athletes. Relation to physical performance. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. (1972) 30(2):175–81. doi: 10.3109/00365517209081108
45. Baguet A, Everaert I, Hespel P, Petrovic M, Achten E, Derave W. A new method for non-invasive estimation of human muscle fiber type composition. PLoS One. (2011) 6(7):e21956. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021956
46. Lievens E, Bellinger P, Van Vossel K, Vancompernolle J, Bex T, Minahan C, et al. Muscle typology of world-class cyclists across various disciplines and events. Med Sci Sports Exerc. (2021) 53(4):816–24. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002518
47. Oki K, Wei B, Feng HZ, Jin JP. The loss of slow skeletal muscle isoform of troponin T in spindle intrafusal fibres explains the pathophysiology of Amish nemaline myopathy. J Physiol. (2019) 597(15):3999–4012. doi: 10.1113/JP278119
48. Anderson T. Biomechanics and running economy. Sports Med. (1996) 22(2):76–89. doi: 10.2165/00007256-199622020-00003
49. Foster C, Lucia A. Running economy: the forgotten factor in elite performance. Sports Med. (2007) 37(4-5):316–9. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200737040-00011
50. Millet GP, Tronche C, Fuster N, Candau R. Level ground and uphill cycling efficiency in seated and standing positions. Med Sci Sports Exercise. (2002) 34(10):1645–52. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200210000-00017
52. Foster C. Monitoring training in athletes with reference to overtraining syndrome. Med Sci Sports Exercise. (1998) 30(7):1164–8. doi: 10.1097/00005768-199807000-00023
53. Davidson P, Virekunnas H, Sharma D, Piche R, Cronin N. Continuous analysis of running mechanics by means of an integrated INS/GPS device. Sensors (Basel). (2019) 19(6). doi: 10.3390/s19061480
54. Sawka MN, Friedl KE. Emerging wearable physiological monitoring technologies and decision aids for health and performance. J Appl Physiol (1985). (2018) 124(2):430–1. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00964.2017
55. Allet L, Knols RH, Shirato K, de Bruin ED. Wearable systems for monitoring mobility-related activities in chronic disease: a systematic review. Sensors (Basel). (2010) 10(10):9026–52. doi: 10.3390/s101009026
56. Trojaniello D, Cereatti A, Pelosin E, Avanzino L, Mirelman A, Hausdorff JM, et al. Estimation of step-by-step spatio-temporal parameters of normal and impaired gait using shank-mounted magneto-inertial sensors: application to elderly, hemiparetic, parkinsonian and choreic gait. J Neuroeng Rehabil. (2014) 11:152. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-11-152
57. Meeusen R, Duclos M, Foster C, Fry A, Gleeson M, Nieman D, et al. Prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of the overtraining syndrome: joint consensus statement of the European College of Sport Science and the American College of Sports Medicine. Med Sci Sports Exerc. (2013) 45(1):186–205. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318279a10a
58. Bourdillon N, Nilchian M, Millet GP. Photoplethysmography detection of overreaching. Med Sci Sports Exerc. (2019) 51(4):701–7. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001836
59. Schmitt L, Bouthiaux S, Millet GP. Eleven years’ monitoring of the world’s most successful Male biathlete of the last decade. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. (2021) 16(6):900–5. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2020-0148
60. Schmitt L, Regnard J, Parmentier AL, Mauny F, Mourot L, Coulmy N, et al. Typology of “fatigue” by heart rate variability analysis in elite nordic-skiers. Int J Sports Med. (2015) 36(12):999–1007. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1548885
61. Wang Z, Jiang F, Xiao J, Chen L, Zhang Y, Li J, et al. Heart rate variability changes in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sleep Res. (2022). doi: 10.1111/jsr.13708
62. Faust O, Hong W, Loh HW, Xu S, Tan RS, Chakraborty S, et al. Heart rate variability for medical decision support systems: a review. Comput Biol Med. (2022) 145:105407. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105407
63. Schmitt L, Willis SJ, Fardel A, Coulmy N, Millet GP. Live high-train low guided by daily heart rate variability in elite Nordic-skiers. Eur J Appl Physiol. (2018) 118(2):419–28. doi: 10.1007/s00421-017-3784-9
64. Astolfi T, Borrani F, Savcic M, Gremeaux V, Millet GP. Heart rate recovery of individuals undergoing cardiac rehabilitation after acute coronary syndrome. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. (2018) 61(2):65–71. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2017.10.005
65. Millet GP, Millet GY. Ultramarathon is an outstanding model for the study of adaptive responses to extreme load and stress. BMC Med. (2012) 10(1):77. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-10-77
66. Burtscher J, Millet GP, Burtscher M. Cardiovascular consequences of acute kidney injury. N Engl J Med. (2020) 383(11):1093. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2023901
67. Veraldi GF, Macri M, Criscenti P, Scorsone L, Zingaretti CC, Gnoni M, et al. Arterial endofibrosis in professional cyclists. G Chir. (2015) 36(6):267–71. doi: 10.11138/gchir/2015.36.6.267
68. Perrier L, Feugier P, Goutain-Majorel C, Girouin N, Boutier R, Papillard M, et al. Arterial endofibrosis in endurance athletes: prospective comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography and computed tomography angiography. Diagn Interv Imaging. (2020) 101(7-8):463–71. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2020.03.003
69. Millet GP, Brocherie F. Hypoxic training is beneficial in elite athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. (2020) 52(2):515–8. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002142
70. Racinais S, Alonso JM, Coutts AJ, Flouris AD, Girard O, Gonzalez-Alonso J, et al. Consensus recommendations on training and competing in the heat. Br J Sports Med. (2015) 49(18):1164–73. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-094915
71. Millet GP, Girard O, Beard A, Brocherie F. Repeated sprint training in hypoxia–an innovative method. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Sportmedizin. (2019) 70:115–22. doi: 10.5960/dzsm.2019.374
72. McIntyre RD, Zurawlew MJ, Mee JA, Walsh NP, Oliver SJ. A comparison of medium-term heat acclimation by post-exercise hot water immersion or exercise in the heat: adaptations, overreaching, and thyroid hormones. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. (2022) 323(5):R601–15. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00315.2021
73. Meeusen R, Lievens P. The use of cryotherapy in sports injuries. Sports Med. (1986) 3(6):398–414. doi: 10.2165/00007256-198603060-00002
74. Dennis MC, Goods PSR, Binnie MJ, Girard O, Wallman KE, Dawson B, et al. Repeated-sprint training in heat and hypoxia: acute responses to manipulating exercise-to-rest ratio. Eur J Sport Sci. (2022):1–11. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2022.2085631
75. Lavier J, Beaumann M, Menetrey S, Bouzourene K, Rosenblatt-Velin N, Pialoux V, et al. High-intensity exercise in hypoxia improves endothelial function via increased nitric oxide bioavailability in C57BL/6 mice. Acta Physiol (Oxf). (2021) 233(2):e13700. doi: 10.1111/apha.13700
76. Duennwald T, Gatterer H, Groop PH, Burtscher M, Bernardi L. Effects of a single bout of interval hypoxia on cardiorespiratory control and blood glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. (2013) 36(8):2183–9. doi: 10.2337/dc12-2113
77. Burtscher J, Mallet RT, Burtscher M, Millet GP. Hypoxia and brain aging: neurodegeneration or neuroprotection? Ageing Res Rev. (2021) 68:101343. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2021.101343
78. Burtscher J, Mallet RT, Pialoux V, Millet GP, Burtscher M. Adaptive responses to hypoxia and/or hyperoxia in humans. Antioxid Redox Signal. (2022) 37(13–15):887–912. doi: 10.1089/ars.2021.0280
79. Baar K. Using molecular biology to maximize concurrent training. Sports Med. (2014) 44(Suppl 2):S117–25. doi: 10.1007/s40279-014-0252-0
80. Chtara M, Chamari K, Chaouachi M, Chaouachi A, Koubaa D, Feki Y, et al. Effects of intra-session concurrent endurance and strength training sequence on aerobic performance and capacity. Br J Sports Med. (2005) 39(8):555–60. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2004.015248
81. Ruiz-Alias SA, Garcia-Pinillos F, Jaen-Carrillo D, Perez-Castilla A. Effect of intra-session exercise sequence of an 8-week concurrent training program on the components of physical fitness in recreationally trained young adults. J Sports Sci. (2022) 40(15):1722–31. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2022.2103615
82. Cadore EL, Izquierdo M, Pinto SS, Alberton CL, Pinto RS, Baroni BM, et al. Neuromuscular adaptations to concurrent training in the elderly: effects of intrasession exercise sequence. Age (Dordr). (2012) 35(3):891–903. doi: 10.1007/s11357-012-9405-y
83. Racil G, Zouhal H, Elmontassar W, Ben Abderrahmane A, De Sousa MV, Chamari K, et al. Plyometric exercise combined with high-intensity interval training improves metabolic abnormalities in young obese females more so than interval training alone. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. (2016) 41(1):103–9. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2015-0384
84. Izquierdo M, Merchant RA, Morley JE, Anker SD, Aprahamian I, Arai H, et al. International exercise recommendations in older adults (ICFSR): expert consensus guidelines. J Nutr Health Aging. (2021) 25(7):824–53. doi: 10.1007/s12603-021-1665-8
85. Rhodes EC, Martin AD, Taunton JE, Donnelly M, Warren J, Elliot J. Effects of one year of resistance training on the relation between muscular strength and bone density in elderly women. Br J Sports Med. (2000) 34(1):18–22. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.34.1.18
86. Gehlsen GM, Whaley MH. Falls in the elderly: part II, balance, strength, and flexibility. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. (1990) 71(10):739–41.2403279
87. Fiatarone MA, Marks EC, Ryan ND, Meredith CN, Lipsitz LA, Evans WJ. High-intensity strength training in nonagenarians. Effects on skeletal muscle. JAMA. (1990) 263(22):3029–34. doi: 10.1001/jama.1990.03440220053029
88. Gojanovic B, Cutti P, Shultz R, Matheson GO. Maximal physiological parameters during partial body-weight support treadmill testing. Med Sci Sports Exerc. (2012) 44(10):1935–41. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31825a5d1f
89. Frangolias DD, Rhodes EC, Taunton JE, Belcastro AN, Coutts KD. Metabolic responses to prolonged work during treadmill and water immersion running. J Sci Med Sport. (2000) 3(4):476–92. doi: 10.1016/S1440-2440(00)80012-2
90. Lemire M, Falbriard M, Aminian K, Pavlik E, Millet GP, Meyer F. Correspondence between values of vertical loading rate and oxygen consumption during inclined running. Sports Med Open. (2022) 8(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s40798-022-00491-2
91. Li SN, Hobbins L, Morin JB, Ryu JH, Gaoua N, Hunter S, et al. Running mechanics adjustments to perceptually-regulated interval runs in hypoxia and normoxia. J Sci Med Sport. (2020) 23(11):1111–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2020.04.001
92. Girard O, Malatesta D, Millet GP. Walking in hypoxia: an efficient treatment to lessen mechanical constraints and improve health in obese individuals? Front Physiol. (2017) 8:73. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00073
93. Fantozzi S, Cortesi M, Giovanardi A, Borra D, Di Michele R, Gatta G. Effect of walking speed during gait in water of healthy elderly. Gait Posture. (2020) 82:6–13. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.08.112
94. Hughes L, Rosenblatt B, Haddad F, Gissane C, McCarthy D, Clarke T, et al. Comparing the effectiveness of blood flow restriction and traditional heavy load resistance training in the post-surgery rehabilitation of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction patients: a UK national health service randomised controlled trial. Sports Med. (2019) 49(11):1787–805. doi: 10.1007/s40279-019-01137-2
95. Bjornsen T, Wernbom M, Kirketeig A, Paulsen G, Samnoy L, Baekken L, et al. Type 1 muscle fiber hypertrophy after blood flow-restricted training in powerlifters. Med Sci Sports Exerc. (2019) 51(2):288–98. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001775
96. Anderson AB, Owens JG, Patterson SD, Dickens JF, LeClere LE. Blood flow restriction therapy: from development to applications. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. (2019) 27(3):119–23. doi: 10.1097/JSA.0000000000000240
97. Saatmann N, Zaharia OP, Loenneke JP, Roden M, Pesta DH. Effects of blood flow restriction exercise and possible applications in type 2 diabetes. Trends Endocrinol Metab. (2021) 32(2):106–17. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2020.11.010
98. Hughes L, Paton B, Rosenblatt B, Gissane C, Patterson SD. Blood flow restriction training in clinical musculoskeletal rehabilitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. (2017) 51(13):1003–11. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-097071
99. Patterson SD, Ferguson RA. Enhancing strength and postocclusive calf blood flow in older people with training with blood-flow restriction. J Aging Phys Act. (2011) 19(3):201–13. doi: 10.1123/japa.19.3.201
100. Hainaut K, Duchateau J. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation and voluntary exercise. Sports Med. (1992) 14(2):100–13. doi: 10.2165/00007256-199214020-00003
101. Lima Y, Ozkaya O, Balci GA, Aydinoglu R, Islegen C. Electromyostimulation application on peroneus longus muscle improves balance and strength in American football players. J Sport Rehabil. (2022) 31(5):599–604. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2021-0264
102. Amaro-Gahete FJ, De-la OA, Jurado-Fasoli L, Dote-Montero M, Gutierrez A, Ruiz JR, et al. Changes in physical fitness after 12 weeks of structured concurrent exercise training, high intensity interval training, or whole-body electromyostimulation training in sedentary middle-aged adults: a randomized controlled trial. Front Physiol. (2019) 10:451. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00451
103. Teschler M, Heimer M, Schmitz B, Kemmler W, Mooren FC. Four weeks of electromyostimulation improves muscle function and strength in sarcopenic patients: a three-arm parallel randomized trial. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. (2021) 12(4):843–54. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12717
104. Blazevich AJ, Collins DF, Millet GY, Vaz MA, Maffiuletti NA. Enhancing adaptations to neuromuscular electrical stimulation training interventions. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. (2021) 49(4):244–52. doi: 10.1249/JES.0000000000000264
105. Maffiuletti NA, Gondin J, Place N, Stevens-Lapsley J, Vivodtzev I, Minetto MA. Clinical use of neuromuscular electrical stimulation for neuromuscular rehabilitation: what are we overlooking? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. (2018) 99(4):806–12. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.10.028
106. Liew SL, Santarnecchi E, Buch ER, Cohen LG. Non-invasive brain stimulation in neurorehabilitation: local and distant effects for motor recovery. Front Hum Neurosci. (2014) 8:378. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00378
107. Cogiamanian F, Marceglia S, Ardolino G, Barbieri S, Priori A. Improved isometric force endurance after transcranial direct current stimulation over the human motor cortical areas. Eur J Neurosci. (2007) 26(1):242–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05633.x
108. Lattari E, de Oliveira BS, Oliveira BRR, de Mello Pedreiro RC, Machado S, Neto GAM. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on time limit and ratings of perceived exertion in physically active women. Neurosci Lett. (2018) 662:12–6. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2017.10.007
109. Holgado D, Vadillo MA, Sanabria D. The effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on objective and subjective indexes of exercise performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain Stimul. (2019) 12(2):242–50. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.12.002
110. Lefaucheur JP, Antal A, Ayache SS, Benninger DH, Brunelin J, Cogiamanian F, et al. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Clin Neurophysiol. (2017) 128(1):56–92. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2016.10.087
111. Holgado D, Vadillo MA, Sanabria D. “Brain-doping,” is it a real threat? Front Physiol. (2019) 10:483. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00483
112. Reardon S. “Brain doping” may improve athletes’ performance. Nature. (2016) 531(7594):283–4. doi: 10.1038/nature.2016.19534
113. Elliott-Sale KJ, Minahan CL, de Jonge X, Ackerman KE, Sipila S, Constantini NW, et al. Methodological considerations for studies in sport and exercise science with women as participants: a working guide for standards of practice for research on women. Sports Med. (2021) 51(5):843–61. doi: 10.1007/s40279-021-01435-8
114. Anonymous. Medical research often ignores differing health outcomes for men and women. Nature. (2018) 553(7686):119.
115. Williams WM. Editorial: underrepresentation of women in science: international and cross-disciplinary evidence and debate. Front Psychol. (2017) 8:2352. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02352
116. Janse DEJX, Thompson B, Han A. Methodological recommendations for menstrual cycle research in sports and exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. (2019) 51(12):2610–7. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002073
117. Meignie A, Duclos M, Carling C, Orhant E, Provost P, Toussaint JF, et al. The effects of menstrual cycle phase on elite athlete performance: a critical and systematic review. Front Physiol. (2021) 12:654585. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.654585
118. Solli GS, Sandbakk O. Training characteristics during pregnancy and postpartum in the world’s most successful cross country skier. Front Physiol. (2018) 9:595. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00595
119. Kiely C, Rocha J, O’Connor E, O’Shea D, Green S, Egana M. Influence of menopause and Type 2 diabetes on pulmonary oxygen uptake kinetics and peak exercise performance during cycling. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. (2015) 309(8):R875–83. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00258.2015
120. Bruinvels G, Hackney AC, Pedlar CR. Menstrual cycle: the importance of both the phases and the transitions between phases on training and performance. Sports Med. (2022) 52(7):1457–60. doi: 10.1007/s40279-022-01691-2
121. Mountjoy M, Sundgot-Borgen J, Burke L, Carter S, Constantini N, Lebrun C, et al. The IOC consensus statement: beyond the female athlete triad--relative energy deficiency in sport (RED-S). Br J Sports Med. (2014) 48(7):491–7. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2014-093502
122. Banister EW, Calvert TW, Savage MV, Bach A. A system model of training for athletic performance. Aust J Sports Med. (1975) 7:170–6.
123. Mujika I, Chatard JC, Busso T, Geyssant A, Barale F, Lacoste L. Effects of training on performance in competitive swimming. Can J Appl Physiol. (1995) 20(4):395–406. doi: 10.1139/h95-031
124. Impellizzeri FM, Rampinini E, Coutts AJ, Sassi A, Marcora SM. Use of RPE-based training load in soccer. Med Sci Sports Exercise. (2004) 36(6):1042–7. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000128199.23901.2F
125. Fricker PA, Pyne DB, Saunders PU, Cox AJ, Gleeson M, Telford RD. Influence of training loads on patterns of illness in elite distance runners. Clin J Sport Med. (2005) 15(4):246–52. doi: 10.1097/01.jsm.0000168075.66874.3e
126. Gabbett TJ, Jenkins DG. Relationship between training load and injury in professional rugby league players. J Sci Med Sport. (2011) 14(3):204–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2010.12.002
127. Issurin V. Block periodization versus traditional training theory: a review. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. (2008) 48(1):65–75.18212712
128. Selles-Perez S, Fernandez-Saez J, Cejuela R. Polarized and pyramidal training intensity distribution: relationship with a half-ironman distance triathlon competition. J Sports Sci Med. (2019) 18(4):708–15.31827355
129. Conlon JA, Newton RU, Tufano JJ, Banyard HG, Hopper AJ, Ridge AJ, et al. Periodization strategies in older adults: impact on physical function and health. Med Sci Sports Exerc. (2016) 48(12):2426–36. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001053
130. Taha T, Thomas SG. Systems modelling of the relationship between training and performance. Sports Med. (2003) 33(14):1061–73. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200333140-00003
131. Busso T, Thomas L. Using mathematical modeling in training planning. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. (2006) 1(4):400–5. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.1.4.400
132. Millet GP, Candau RB, Barbier B, Busso T, Rouillon JD, Chatard JC. Modelling the transfers of training effects on performance in elite triathletes. Int J Sports Med. (2002) 23(1):55–63. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-19276
133. Hellard P, Avalos M, Millet G, Lacoste L, Barale F, Chatard JC. Modeling the residual effects and threshold saturation of training: a case study of Olympic swimmers. J Strength Cond Res. (2005) 19(1):67–75. doi: 10.1519/14853.1
134. Briand J, Deguire S, Gaudet S, Bieuzen F. Monitoring variables influence on random forest models to forecast injuries in short-track speed skating. Front Sports Act Living. (2022) 4:896828. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2022.896828
135. Burkett B. Technology in Paralympic sport: performance enhancement or essential for performance? Br J Sports Med. (2010) 44(3):215–20. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2009.067249
136. McNamee M, Parnell R, Vanlandewijck Y. Fairness, technology and the ethics of Paralympic sport classification. Eur J Sport Sci. (2021) 21(11):1510–7. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2021.1961022
137. Tuakli-Wosornu YA, Li X, Ona Ayala KE, Wu Y, Amick M, Frumberg DB. The impact of blade technology on paralympic sprint performance between 1996 and 2016: bilateral Amputees’ competitive advantage. Adapt Phys Activ Q. (2021) 38(3):494–505. doi: 10.1123/apaq.2020-0064
138. Fukui K, Maeda N, Sasadai J, Shimizu R, Tsutsumi S, Arima S, et al. Analysis of wheelchair falls in team sports at the Paralympic Games: video-based descriptive comparison between the Rio 2016 and Tokyo 2020 games. BMJ open. (2022) 12(8):e060937. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-060937
Keywords: elite sport, exercise, health, physical activity, prevention, sport and exercise medicine, therapeutic strategies.
Citation: Millet GP and Chamari K (2023) Look to the stars—Is there anything that public health and rehabilitation can learn from elite sports?. Front. Sports Act. Living 4:1072154. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2022.1072154
Received: 17 October 2022; Accepted: 1 December 2022;
Published: 23 January 2023.
Edited by:
François Billaut, Université Laval, CanadaReviewed by:
David Fukuda, University of Central Florida, United StatesFrançois Bieuzen, Institut national du sport du québec, Canada
© 2023 Millet and Chamari. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Grégoire P. Millet Z3JlZ29pcmUubWlsbGV0QHVuaWwuY2g=
Specialty Section: This article was submitted to Exercise Physiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Sports and Active Living