Skip to main content

CONCEPTUAL ANALYSIS article

Front. Sociol.

Sec. Sociology of Emotion

Volume 10 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2025.1508740

This article is part of the Research Topic Love: From Emotion to Social Action, Beyond Opposition View all articles

Cooperative behaviour and affect heuristic. When the rationality of love matters

Provisionally accepted
  • Department of Law and Social Sciences, Division of Social Sciences, G. d'Annunzio University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    A central problem of social theory consists in explaining individual cooperative behaviour. One of the main interpretations is rooted in the rational choice theory, born from the homo oeconomicus model, which proposes instrumental rationality, maximization of expected utility and self-interest as unique presuppositions of individual behaviour. These assumptions have been widely criticized, especially concerning their descriptive adequacy in cases of cooperative behaviour. Numerous empirical evidence shows how individual behaviour can be disinterested in these cases, not based on instrumental calculation and, therefore, explainable on the basis of other dimensions in cognitive human system and individual action. Based on the literature developed in the field of cognitive psychology and experimental economics, the article proposes to analyse cooperative behaviours (conceived in a broad sense since not necessarily implying shared goals), considering components of the rationality of a cognitive and emotional nature, using the concept of affect heuristic. It shows how some emotional behavioural responses (e.g. love, fairness moods, etc.) can be crucial in explaining individual selfless behaviours and their role in developing cooperation. Our analysis is developed in the light of a broader cognitive system and a more extended notion of rationality than the strictly economic one.

    Keywords: Rational choice theory, cooperation, Emotions, affective heuristic,, cognitive rationality

    Received: 09 Oct 2024; Accepted: 18 Mar 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Oliverio. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Albertina Oliverio, Department of Law and Social Sciences, Division of Social Sciences, G. d'Annunzio University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more