Skip to main content

CONCEPTUAL ANALYSIS article

Front. Sociol.
Sec. Sociology of Emotion
Volume 9 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2024.1448676
This article is part of the Research Topic Affecting, Emoting, and Feeling Disability: Entanglements at the Intersection of Disability Studies and the Sociology of Emotions View all 4 articles

Rethinking Love, Independence, and Speciesism in Assistance Dog Discourse

Provisionally accepted
  • Independent researcher, Berlin, Germany

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    This paper challenges the prevailing belief that assistance dogs inherently love their roles, arguing that the notion of "unconditional love" in discourses on assistance dog perpetuates a human-centric perspective and reinforces speciesism. It emphasizes the importance of recognizing the affective experiences of these working animals and of acknowledging the interdependence between people with disabilities and assistance dogs. The paper has four main objectives: (1) critiquing the concept of unconditional love attributed to assistance dogs, (2) recognizing the physical and affective labor of assistance dogs, (3) highlighting the importance of interdependence over independence, and (4) exploring the intersections of ableism and speciesism in the context of assistance dogs. By examining the role of love as a narrative-framing device, the paper aims to reveal how anthropocentric viewpoints often obscure the exploitation of assistance dogs. Incorporating insights from humananimal studies and disability studies, the paper seeks to enrich sociological research on emotions and power structures, advocating for a shift towards valuing the labor and well-being of assistance dogs. This approach challenges the liberal ideology of independence and promotes a more inclusive understanding of interspecies relationships, ultimately enhancing the sociological study of emotions, and intersections between sociology, disability studies, and human-animal studies.

    Keywords: Assistance dogs, love, Affective labor, independence, Interdependence, speciesism

    Received: 13 Jun 2024; Accepted: 03 Dec 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Taş. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Birkan Taş, Independent researcher, Berlin, Germany

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.