Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Sociol.
Sec. Medical Sociology
Volume 9 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2024.1355215
This article is part of the Research Topic Health and Illness Interactions View all 8 articles

Integrated Care Systems in England: The significance of collaborative community assets in promoting and sustaining health and wellbeing

Provisionally accepted
Oonagh P. Corrigan Oonagh P. Corrigan 1*Pauline Lane Pauline Lane 1Scott Danielsen Scott Danielsen 2Shannon Doherty Shannon Doherty 1
  • 1 Faculty of Medical Science, Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford, United Kingdom
  • 2 Colchester City Council., Colchester, United Kingdom

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Until recently the healthcare system in England was based on a commissioning/provider model. However, this has been replaced with an Integrated Care Systems (ICSs) approach, aimed at improving health and wellbeing and reducing inequalities through local collaborative partnerships with public sector organisations, community groups, social enterprise organisations and other local agencies. Part of this new approach is an emphasis on the role of community assets (i.e., local resources), that are considered integral to promoting positive health and wellbeing outcomes. This paper presents research from a series of three research studies on 'community assets' conducted in the East of England within a newly established ICS. Based on analysis of qualitative data highlighting the lived experience of community asset members, this paper shows the positive wellbeing impact on vulnerable community members that assets provide. Further insight on the local impact and the collaborative nature of the research is provided suggesting that new asset-based approaches recognise the social determinants of health. This presents a shift away from positivistic linear approaches to population health and wellbeing to a new non-linear collaborative approach to addressing health inequalities and promoting wellbeing. The authors suggest that exploring this through a complexity theory lens could illuminate this further.Finally, the authors warn that while community assets have an important role to play in empowering citizens and providing much needed support to vulnerable and disadvantaged communities, they are not a substitute for functioning funded public sector services that are currently being undermined by ongoing local governments funding cuts. As such, while community assets can help ameliorate some of the negative effects people experience due to economic, structural and health disadvantages, only a more fair and more equal distribution of resources can address growing health inequalities.

    Keywords: Integrated care systems, Community assets, complexity theory, Health inequalites, Community

    Received: 13 Dec 2023; Accepted: 05 Jul 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Corrigan, Lane, Danielsen and Doherty. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Oonagh P. Corrigan, Faculty of Medical Science, Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford, United Kingdom

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.