94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Soc. Psychol.
Sec. Attitudes, Social Justice and Political Psychology
Volume 3 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/frsps.2025.1467884
Ideological Constraint and Behavioral Consistency-A Person-Centered Approach to Political Attitudes and Public Goods Games Behavior
Provisionally accepted- 1 Swedish School of Social Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Uusimaa, Finland
- 2 Helsinki Institute for Social Sciences and Humanities, Swedish School of Social Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Uusimaa, Finland
- 3 Faculty of Business Administration, Technische Universität Bergakademie Freiberg, Freiberg, Germany, Freiberg, Germany
- 4 TUM School of Social Sciences and Technology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany, Munich, Germany
A long-standing debate in research on the political attitudes of the mass public concerns the extent to which these attitudes are ideologically constrained. Another, more recent debate, asks whether these attitudes are indicative of more general social behavior. We investigated (1) how ideologically constrained the preferences of the mass public are and (2) whether ideological differences are associated with actual social behavior. To shed new light on these entrenched debates we employed a person-centered approach-latent profile analysis (LPA). A sample of German students (N = 659) responded to a questionnaire assessing attitudes towards currently contested topics (e.g., immigration, environmental policy) and played the Public Goods Game. By means of LPA, we identified four rather distinct groups. The Normative (46.0 %) and the Anti-gay (16.4%) expressed the average opinion on all issues, with the exception that the latter were strongly against gay rights. The Progressive (28.9 %) supported, across all issues, greater equality. This group also gave most in the Public Goods Game. The Right-Wing (7.0 %) had strong views that were exactly the reverse image of those of the Progressive. Women were disproportionately progressive, and men Right-Wing or Anti-gay. Non-native speakers were disproportionately Anti-gay. We suggest that the Progressive and the Right-Wing were ideologically constrained in the customary sense-they were consistent from one issue to the next. We argue that the Normative and Anti-gay were also ideologically constrained-those believing themselves to have stepped out of ideology are in our interpretation the most enslaved by ideology.
Keywords: political ideology, Ideological constraint, Person-centered approach, political attitudes, Public goods game, Experimental Economics Far-right
Received: 21 Jul 2024; Accepted: 03 Mar 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Lönnqvist, Leikas and Walkowitz. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Jan-Erik Lönnqvist, Swedish School of Social Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, 00014 University of Helsinki, Uusimaa, Finland
Gari Walkowitz, Faculty of Business Administration, Technische Universität Bergakademie Freiberg, Freiberg, Germany, Freiberg, Germany
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.