The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Soc. Psychol.
Sec. Gender, Sexuality and Relationships
Volume 2 - 2024 |
doi: 10.3389/frsps.2024.1487339
Specific Reasons for Living and Suicide Resilience Mechanisms Negatively Predict Suicide Risk among Sexual Minorities
Provisionally accepted- San Francisco VA Health Care System, Veterans Health Administration, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, San Francisco, United States
Introduction: Sexual minority (SM) adults experience disproportionately high rates of suicide, yet it is not clear what protective factors offset the risk of suicide.A cross-sectional online survey of 564 SM adults assessed associations between suicide outcomes, suicide resilience and reasons for living (RFL).Results: Survival and Coping Beliefs and Moral Objections subscales of the RFL, as well as Suicide Resilience were negatively associated with likelihood of future suicide attempts.Suicide resilience and some RFL subscales are protective against suicide for SM adults, which not only supports the use of RFL and resilience among SM adults, but provides an empirical foundation for developing a culturally-specific RFL measure.
Keywords: Suicidality, Protective factors, suicide resilience, Reasons for living, LGBTQ+ Specific Reasons for Living and Suicide Resilience Mechanisms Negatively Predict Suicide Risk among Sexual Minorities
Received: 27 Aug 2024; Accepted: 04 Nov 2024.
Copyright: © 2024 Van Zyl. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Maryke Van Zyl, San Francisco VA Health Care System, Veterans Health Administration, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, San Francisco, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.