Skip to main content

REVIEW article

Front. Soc. Psychol.
Sec. Attitudes, Social Justice and Political Psychology
Volume 2 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/frsps.2024.1461701
This article is part of the Research Topic Social and Political Psychological Perspectives on Global Threats to Democracy View all articles

Of course people can reject democracy: Psychological perspectives

Provisionally accepted
  • Syracuse University, Syracuse, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Concerns have been expressed about a worldwide retreat from liberal democracy and a turn towards more authoritarian forms of government. Along with that concern has come surprise: when the cold war ended, it was widely believed that a new historical era was dawning during which alternatives to Western liberalism would wither away. Influential psychological theories also assume that freedom and autonomy are powerful human needs-needs that are thwarted by dictatorships. However, a number of theoretical perspectives and programs of research in psychology lead to the conclusion that in certain circumstances, turns toward authoritarian forms of government and restrictive societies are not only explicable, but also predictable. Fromm's analysis of why people might want to escape from freedom, Baumeister's work on escape-from-self mechanisms, and Schwartz's review of the literature on choice overload all provide ways of understanding why in turbulent times, members of free countries might intentionally seek out--and perhaps even ecstatically embrace--authoritarian forms of government.

    Keywords: Political psychology, Authoritarianism, autonomy, choice - behaviour, Democracy, self

    Received: 08 Jul 2024; Accepted: 23 Jul 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Newman. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Leonard S. Newman, Syracuse University, Syracuse, United States

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.