The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Sleep
Sec. Sleep, Behavior and Mental Health
Volume 4 - 2025 |
doi: 10.3389/frsle.2025.1499802
The use and subjective experience of sleep apps and their relationship with personality characteristics among young adults
Provisionally accepted- 1 Department of Psychosocial Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- 2 Norwegian Competence Center for Sleep Disorders, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Hordaland, Norway
- 3 Department of Health Promotion, Division of Mental and Physical Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH), Bergen, Hordaland, Norway
- 4 Department of Psychosocial Science, Faculty of Psychology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Hordaland, Norway
- 5 Department of Sociology, Central South University, Changsha, China
- 6 Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
Introduction: Sleep app use has become widespread in recent years. Still, understanding of characteristics of users and the impact of sleep app usage remains limited. Methods: A sample of 940 young adults (18-30 years) living in the UK were recruited from Prolific (online research platform offering researchers access to survey panels) and invited to participate in a survey on the use and experience with sleep apps. Both sleep app users and non-users were invited. The survey included questions about demographics, morningness (Horne–Östberg Morningness–Eveningness Questionnaire-reduced scale), insomnia symptoms (Bergen Insomnia Scale), personality (HEXACO: Honesty-Humility, Emotionality, Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, and Openness to Experience), in addition to sleep app usage and how such use is experienced. A logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify characteristics of sleep app users. Factor analysis was used to elucidate dimensions of sleep app use experiences. Scores on the items making up each factor were then regressed on demographic variables, morningness, insomnia symptoms and personality.Results: In all, 36.8% of the participants reported using or having used sleep apps. Use was positively associated with age, insomnia symptoms, and conscientiousness. The factor analysis revealed three factors coined: trust/objectification (trust in sleep app results), negative (e.g., becoming stressed) and positive (e.g., prioritize sleep more) perceived effects. Trust/objectification was positively associated with age and agreeableness, and inversely related to high education and openness to experience. Insomnia symptoms and emotionality were associated with perceived negative effects. Morningness and male gender were associated with perceived positive effects whereas high education had an inverse relationship with perceived positive effects. Discussion: The use of sleep apps was widespread. Different responses to sleep app usage were observed and linked to various individual variables. The findings suggest that perceived effects of sleep apps usage should be considered in light of individual differences. Research on sleep apps is still in its early stages, and several suggestions (recommendations) for future studies are outlined.
Keywords: Sleep, APP, Effects, Users, Survey
Received: 21 Sep 2024; Accepted: 09 Jan 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Pallesen, Vedaa, Sunde, Harris, Waage, Saxvig, Zhang and Bjorvatn. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Ståle Pallesen, Department of Psychosocial Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.