The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
COMMUNITY CASE STUDY article
Front. Sleep
Sec. Sleep and Breathing
Volume 3 - 2024 |
doi: 10.3389/frsle.2024.1444689
Implementing TeleSleep at Veterans Healthcare Administration: An organizational case study of adaptation and sustainment
Provisionally accepted- 1 Surgery and Health Policy, School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
- 2 San Francisco VA Health Care System, Veterans Health Administration, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, San Francisco, California, United States
- 3 Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
- 4 Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada, United States
- 5 Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
- 6 Department of Anesthesia, School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
Veteran access to sleep medicine is of paramount importance to the Veterans Health Administration (VA). To increase access, VA has created community referral policies and programs, as well as telehealth programs. In 2017, the Office of Rural Health (ORH) funded a TeleSleep initiative focused on reaching rural Veterans with unmet sleep needs. ORH provided 3 to 6 years of funding to help 19 hubs support 98 spoke sites serving rural Veterans. As ORH funding concluded, each hub identified its path to sustainment. This case study follows one TeleSleep hub in VA's western geographic region as it transitioned from ORH funding sustainment as a regional Sleep Clinical Resource Hub. This case study describes the real-world process of adaptation in care delivery strategies. One key area of adaptation revolved around whether to deliver care via the patient's home facility or the provider's home facility. In early 2021, the TeleSleep team implemented an innovative provider transfer model, where temporary reinforcements from the TeleSleep hub increased the workforce capacity of spoke sites, similar to the concept of locum tenens. In this provider transfer model, TeleSleep clinicians scheduled, documented, and billed for each encounter at the Veteran’s home facility. Positioning TeleSleep clinicians as local providers facilitated communication and referrals and promoted continuity and quality of care for Veterans in their home facility. This provider transfer model reduced the administrative burden of providers and schedulers and supported patient-side-only documentation of care. While this mirrors current locum tenens practice, transferring providers did not fit VA’s financial model as implemented by the western region’s Sleep Clinical Resource Hub. Therefore, in December 2021, VA aligned TeleSleep with VA’s preferred practice of patient rather than provider transfers. In the patient transfer model, providers schedule and document in both the provider and patient electronic health records, and bill in the provider’s facility. However, reflecting on this period of innovation, TeleSleep team members concluded that the provider transfer model could improve patient safety and care coordination while reducing the administrative burden of frontline clinicians. Further research and development are needed to align the provider transfer model with VA’s financial model.
Keywords: Sleep medicine, telehealth, implementation, adaptation, Sustainment, program process theory, program planning. (Min.5-Max. 8, case study
Received: 06 Jun 2024; Accepted: 26 Aug 2024.
Copyright: © 2024 Belkora, Reichert, Williams, Whooley, Rezayat, Sorensen, Chilakamarri, Sanders, Maas, Gomez, Kurien, Ashbrook, Thomas and Sarmiento. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Jeffrey Belkora, Surgery and Health Policy, School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
Kathleen Sarmiento, San Francisco VA Health Care System, Veterans Health Administration, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, San Francisco, 94121, California, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.