Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Robot. AI, 05 November 2024
Sec. Field Robotics
This article is part of the Research Topic Pipeline Inspection Robots View all 5 articles

Editorial: Pipeline inspection robots

  • 1School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
  • 2Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Ritsumeikan University, Kyoto, Japan
  • 3Robotics and Autonomous Systems Thrust, Systems Hub, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou), Guangzhou, China
  • 4School of Mechanical Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Jongno-gu, Republic of Korea
  • 5Department of Precision Mechanical Engineering, Chuo University, Hachioji, Japan

Editorial on the Research Topic
Pipeline inspection robots

1 Introduction

Recent years have witnessed an incredible progress in Artificial Intelligence (AI), Machine Learning, Robotics and Digital Technologies. The Research Topic: “Pipeline Inspection Robots” demonstrates the power of AI to introduce autonomy is difficult underground environments, not so friendly for human operations.

This Research Topic identifies challenges and proposes potential solutions to autonomous robot tasks in pipe networks. Some of the challenges are due to a number of factors: the infrastructure (e.g., winding pipes, curved or branched), the sensors and intelligent sensing methods, robot resilience to sub-terrain environments and GPS-denied communications. This Research Topic introduces the state-of-the-art research on pipeline inspection robots and contains contribution articles showing the potential of autonomous robots to revolutionise work and empower maintenance teams in their difficult tasks. This Research Topic also brings together papers from very different perspectives: autonomous control of in-pipe inspection robots, robot localization, environmental adaptation mechanisms, and safety in collaborative robotics.

We called for the participation of researchers and engineers working in this field and we collected the contributions on the topics described in the next section. Four papers were accepted as a result of the call for manuscripts.

2 Overview of the contents of the research topic

Article (Nauert and Kampmann) identifies key requirements to autonomous underwater robots and major challenges which need to be addressed in development of new technologies. High level of autonomy constitutes the main challenge. The paper gives an overview of works for inspection, including inspection with visual, acoustic and electromagnetic methods. Different inspection and maintenance tasks performed by industry are discussed in connection with the technology and the current state-of-the-art of underwater robots is presented. This work focuses on maintenance and inspection from the outside of the underwater pipe. The inspection and maintenance tasks, required by the industry and the currently employed tooling, are described and the current state of underwater robots was presented.

In (Kakogawa and Ma) an in-pipe crawler robot is developed. It has a modular structure and can automatically shift its body shape. The robot can shift its body shape to a parallelogram and adapts to obstacles and environmental conditions thanks to the crawlers. The influence of the robot roll angle, torques, parameters and external factors are studied in detail. The impact of the initial robot resistance is also thoroughly studied. The advantages of the designed mechanism are demonstrated over real experiments.

Pipe networks challenge vision-based navigation systems since there are no well pronounced features in images, such as corners, lines and repeated texture. To address this challenge, Edwards et al. develop a method for robot localisation in pipe networks that is able to deal with the sparse image features. The importance of approximate localization methods operating in one degree-of-freedom environment along the pipe length that are robust to environmental changes is discussed with respect to accurate odometry methods, operating in six degrees of freedom, but requiring well visible image features.

Nguyen et al. introduce a miniaturised mobile robot with efficient control for pipe inspection. The aim is to fully automate the inspection of 75-mm-diameter sewers without any visual aid or power-intensive image processing tools. The wheel-legs mechanism allow the robot to move through uneven terrains. The robot implements an interesting idea about a high-level control and low-level control. Low-level control is primarily aimed at achieving stability, moving to and along the center of pipes. High-level control is used to determine the local robot state, and for during decision making.

However, the common points among them are how we develop the high performance robot within the extremely large space limitation and the harsh environment. This requires how to maximize the performance under limited conditions, which is very useful information not only for pipe inspection robots but also for many other robotics research and development efforts in terms of robot size and weight reduction, simplification, cost reduction, etc. We hope that the results of this Research Topic will be helpful to readers in a wide range of fields and lead to further development. Computational aspects and efficiency are essential since these robots operate under constraints, including from energy perspectives.

3 Conclusion

The creation of miniature robots, equipped with computational and communication resources requires further attention. This issue presents current developments from this area.

Author contributions

LM: Conceptualization, Methodology, Resources, Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing. AK: Methodology, Writing–original draft. SM: Writing–review and editing. HC: Writing–review and editing. TN: Writing–review and editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. LM is thankful to the support from the UK’s Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) through the Pervasive Sensing for Buried Pipes (PipeBots) Programme Grant EP/S016813/1.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest and demonstrates their potential.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Keywords: robotics, artificial intelligence simultaneous robot localisation and mapping (SLAM), robot control, pipe networks, inspection, maintenance

Citation: Mihaylova L, Kakogawa A, Ma S, Choi HR and Nakamura T (2024) Editorial: Pipeline inspection robots. Front. Robot. AI 11:1497809. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2024.1497809

Received: 17 September 2024; Accepted: 16 October 2024;
Published: 05 November 2024.

Edited and reviewed by:

Dongbing Gu, University of Essex, United Kingdom

Copyright © 2024 Mihaylova, Kakogawa, Ma, Choi and Nakamura. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Lyudmila Mihaylova, l.s.mihaylova@sheffield.ac.uk

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.